Volar Bearing PlatesRecalls & reported problems across all models
Trimed, INC. · 16 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names at least one Volar Bearing Plates model. Check whether yours is affected in the recall details, and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 15
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 9
- Recalls
- 1
We found 16 models of Volar Bearing Plates by Trimed, INC. in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 15 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Nov 28, 2023 and Sep 29, 2026 — classified as 9 injuries, 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Unintended Movement” (8 reports).
1 FDA recall record name at least one of these models by its device identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
Volar Bearing Plates recalls
FDA recall records that name at least one of these models by its device identifier, newest first. Each recall usually covers specific models or lots, so check the details.
- Nov 28, 2023Open, Classified
Plates, part of a wrist fixation system, are affixed during surgery with bearings that may pop out from distal peg holes.
Z-0932-2024 · Root cause: Labeling design · names 14 of these models · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported Volar Bearing Plates problems
Device problems
- Unintended Movement8
- Device Fell7
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Break1
- Deformation Due to Compressive Stress1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions12
- Failure of Implant2
- Fall1
- Implant Pain1
- Malunion of Bone1
Volar Bearing Plates models
16 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- Volar Bearing Plates VBEAL-3-7SPlate, fixation, bone1 recall6 reports
- Volar Bearing Plates VBEAR-3-7SPlate, fixation, bone1 recall3 reports
- Volar Bearing Plates VBEAR-5-7SPlate, fixation, bone1 recall2 reports
- Volar Bearing Plates VBEAL-3-7NPlate, fixation, bone1 recall1 report
- Volar Bearing Plates VBEAL-3-7WPlate, fixation, bone1 recall1 report
- Volar Bearing Plates VBEAL-5-7NPlate, fixation, bone1 recall0 reports
- Volar Bearing Plates VBEAL-5-7SPlate, fixation, bone1 recall0 reports
- Volar Bearing Plates VBEAL-7-7SPlate, fixation, bone1 recall0 reports
- Volar Bearing Plates VBEAL-5-7WPlate, fixation, bone1 recall0 reports
- Volar Bearing Plates VBEAR-3-7NPlate, fixation, bone1 recall0 reports
- Volar Bearing Plates VBEAR-5-7NPlate, fixation, bone1 recall0 reports
- Volar Bearing Plates VBEAR-7-7SPlate, fixation, bone1 recall0 reports
- Volar Bearing Plates VBEAR-3-7WPlate, fixation, bone1 recall0 reports
- Volar Bearing Plates VBEAR-5-7WPlate, fixation, bone1 recall0 reports
- Volar Bearing Plates VLBPL-7-7Plate, fixation, bone1 report
- Volar Bearing Plates VBEAR-11-7SPlate, fixation, bone1 report
Recent Volar Bearing Plates adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 29, 2026Unintended Movement; Device Fell
Distributor reported on (b)(6) 2026 that a surgeon was placing a competitor's dorsal plate due to previous TriMed wrist construct failing, this construct included VBEAR-3-7S with 2.4TPEG and 3.2mm cortical and locking screws. The original TriMed wrist construct was implanted on (b)(6) 2026 and removed on (b)(6) 2026. The surgeon was concerned how the distal screws migrated proximally and one of the bearers came out of the plate. The orthopaedic surgeons advised the patient didn't fall prior to the plate removal and no other incidents were reported by the surgeons. It was reported that the patient was was a 67 yr female, it is unknown if the patient has poor bone quality and it is believed she would have comorbidities however unaware of what they are. The revision surgery was successful with no delay in surgery and no additional reported adverse event.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50934716 ↗InjurySep 9, 2026Insufficient Device Problem Information
Sales Rep reported on (b)(6) 2026 that a when a surgeon was implanting a VBEAL-3-7, a TPEG2.4 screw passed through the plate. The surgeon had to remove the already implanted screws and plate to switch to a new VBEAL-3-7S to complete the surgery which took approx. 30 minutes. The second plate was implanted successfully with no further issues. The rep was not present during the case but after they spoke to the R4, he believed the bearing was disrupted when they drilled using the single sided tissue protector. After TriMed Product Management spoked with the rep, the rep is unsure if the bearing popped out and did not know which screw hole was affected. Another sales rep stated on (b)(6) 2026 that the surgeon did not use the term that the bearing popped out but when they advanced the screw the screw basically broke through the bearing using the TPEG 2.4.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50696722 ↗InjurySep 8, 2026Unintended Movement; Device Fell
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50677715 ↗MalfunctionAug 29, 2025Unintended Movement; Device Fell; Unintended Movement; Device Fell
SALES REP REPORTED ON 03AUG2025 THAT THE DISTAL SCREWS COLLAPSED IN A VBEAL-3-7S. ORIGINAL IMPLANT DATE IS UNKNOWN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED ON 12AUG2025 WHERE THE REP STATED NO DEVICES BROKE, THIS WAS NOT A REMOVAL SURGERY, THE DEVICE REMAINS IMPLANTED AND THERE WAS NO REPORTED ADVERSE EVENT. A SECOND FOLLOW-UP ON (B)(6) 2025 INDICATED THAT THERE IS NO REVISION SURGERY PLANNED, THERE IS NO PATIENT DISCOMFORT AND THE SURGEON BELIEVES THE PATIENT WILL HEAL PROPERLY WHILE LEAVING THE PLATE INSITU. TRIMED FOLLOWED UP AGAIN ON (B)(6) 2025 TO GATHER ADDITIONAL X-RAYS AND MORE INSIGHT ON HOW THIS ISSUE WAS DISCOVERED BY THE SURGEON. AN X-RAY WAS PROVIDED ON (B)(6) 2025, WHICH SHOWS THE PLATE IS PARTIALLY FIXED TO THE BONE WITH NO DETAILS ON THE DATE AND TIME OF THE X-RAY. PLATE STILL REMAINS IMPLANTED AND WILL NOT BE RETURNED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22925953 ↗InjuryAug 1, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A SALES REP REPORTED ON 09JUL2025 THAT WHEN THE SURGEON WAS REMOVING A VBEAL-3-7S, THE DISTAL SCREWS IN THE PLATE WOULD NOT DISENGAGE FROM THE BEARINGS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THIS CAUSED A SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE CASE (OVER 20 MINS). THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO EVENTUALLY REMOVE THE PLATE EVEN THOUGH ALL SCREWS WERE NOT ABLE TO DISENGAGE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 22JUL2025 WHICH THE REP STATED THE SURGEON SUSPECTS THE PATIENT DID FALL POST-OP. HE DIRECTED THIS INQUIRY TO THE PATIENT, HOWEVER, THE PATIENT DENIED THIS OCCURRED. THE SURGEON ALSO NOTICED THE PATIENT WAS NO LONGER WEARING HIS SPLINT WHEN HE ARRIVED FOR A POST-OP VISIT WHICH THE SURGEON THOUGHT WAS SUSPICIOUS. THE SURGEON REVEALED HE GAVE THE PATIENT SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS TO NOT REMOVE THE SPLINT. FINALLY, IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THERE WAS CAUSE FOR REMOVAL OF THE PLATE. X- RAYS AND CLINIC NOTES FROM PHYSICAL EXAM ON (B)(6) 2025 IDENTIFIED LOSS OF FIXATION AS WELL AS PROMINENCE ON THE DISTAL END OF THE VOLAR BEARING PLATE. THE FRACTURE HAD HEALED IN A POOR POSITION BECAUSE OF HARDWARE FAILURE WHICH CAUSED PATIENT DISCOMFORT. ALSO, THE SURGEON REPORTED DURING REMOVAL THE DISTAL ROW OF SCREWS APPEARED MISALIGNED FR
Patient problems: Malunion of Bone
MAUDE report 22688403 ↗InjuryJul 8, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A SALES REP REPORTED ON 10JUN2025 THAT A SURGEON HAD TWO WS3 VOLAR BEARING PLATE FAILURES WHERE HE INDICATED HE THOUGHT THE BEARING WASN'T LOCKING INTO THE PLATE PROPERLY. A SALES REP PROVIDED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON 25JUN2025 WITH X-RAYS FOR BOTH CASES AND THE DEVICES WERE IDENTIFIED AS THE VBEAR-3-7S AND VBEAR-5-7S. THE SURGEON REPORTED THAT THERE WERE NO POST-OP INJURIES AND NO ASSOCIATED CO-MORBIDITIES. REVISION SURGERY WAS AFTER 3 MONTHS FOR THE 1ST PATIENT, VBEAR-3-7S (EXACT IMPLANT DATE AND REMOVAL DATE UNK) AND 4 MONTHS AFTER FOR THE SECOND PATIENT VBEAR-5-7S (EXACT IMPLANT DATE AND REMOVAL DATE UNK). IT WAS OBSERVED THROUGH X-RAY PHOTOS PROVIDED THAT THE PROXIMAL ROW OF THE PLATE DID NOT HAVE ANY SCREWS IMPLANTED. THE SURGEON STATED THAT DURING THE INITIAL SURGERY THE BEARINGS WERE LOCKED AT THE END OF BOTH CASES. FINALLY, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE 1ST PATIENT HAD ADDITIONAL SURGERY TO REMOVE THE PLATE AND THE 2ND PATIENT RUPTURED HER FPL TENDON WHICH WILL REQUIRE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE TENDON.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22438760 ↗InjuryJul 8, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A SALES REP REPORTED ON 10JUN2025 THAT A SURGEON HAD TWO WS3 VOLAR BEARING PLATE FAILURES WHERE HE INDICATED HE THOUGHT THE BEARING WASN'T LOCKING INTO THE PLATE PROPERLY. A SALES REP PROVIDED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON 25JUN2025 WITH X-RAYS FOR BOTH CASES AND THE DEVICES WERE IDENTIFIED AS THE VBEAR-3-7S AND VBEAR-5-7S. THE SURGEON REPORTED THAT THERE WERE NO POST-OP INJURIES AND NO ASSOCIATED CO-MORBIDITIES. REVISION SURGERY WAS AFTER 3 MONTHS FOR THE 1ST PATIENT, VBEAR-3-7S (EXACT IMPLANT DATE AND REMOVAL DATE UNK) AND 4 MONTHS AFTER FOR THE SECOND PATIENT VBEAR-5-7S (EXACT IMPLANT DATE AND REMOVAL DATE UNK). IT WAS OBSERVED THROUGH X-RAY PHOTOS PROVIDED THAT THE PROXIMAL ROW OF THE PLATE DID NOT HAVE ANY SCREWS IMPLANTED. THE SURGEON STATED THAT DURING THE INITIAL SURGERY THE BEARINGS WERE LOCKED AT THE END OF BOTH CASES. FINALLY, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE 1ST PATIENT HAD ADDITIONAL SURGERY TO REMOVE THE PLATE AND THE 2ND PATIENT RUPTURED HER FPL TENDON WHICH WILL REQUIRE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE TENDON.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22438757 ↗MalfunctionMay 23, 2025Unintended Movement; Device Fell; Unintended Movement; Device Fell
A SALES REP REPORTED ON 29APR2025, THAT WHILE REVIEWING POST-OP X-RAYS ON (B)(6) 2025 THE SURGEON NOTICED THE BEARINGS ON THE VBEAL-3-7S HAD COLLAPSED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INTRA-OP X-RAYS TAKEN ON (B)(6) 2025 LOOKED GOOD FOR THE PLATE AND REVISION SURGERY DATE HAS NOT BEEN CONFIRMED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ORIGINAL SURGERY WAS PERFORMED BY A FELLOW WITH AN EXPERIENCED REP IN THE ROOM, THE PROXIMAL SCREWS WERE NOT IMPLANTED SINCE THE FELLOW FELT THE DISTAL ROW FIXATION WAS ADEQUATE AND BELIEVED ALL BEARINGS WERE LOCKED. IT WAS STATED THAT THE PATIENT WAS COMPLIANT WITH POST-OP INSTRUCTIONS. INTRA-OP AND POST-OP X-RAYS WERE PROVIDED BUT PRE-OP X-RAYS COULD NOT BE OBTAINED AND THE DEVICE REMAINS IMPLANTED UNTIL THE REVISION SURGERY IS SCHEDULED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22079965 ↗MalfunctionMay 23, 2025Unintended Movement; Device Fell; Unintended Movement; Device Fell
A SALES REP REPORTED ON 29APR2025 THAT WHILE REVIEWING POST-OP X-RAYS ON (B)(6) 2025 THE SURGEON NOTICED THE BEARINGS ON THE VBEAL-3-7S HAD COLLAPSED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INTRA-OP X-RAYS TAKEN ON (B)(6) 2025 LOOK GOOD FOR THE PLATE AND REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2025. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ORIGINAL SURGERY WAS PERFORMED BY A FELLOW WITH AN EXPERIENCED REP IN THE ROOM, THE PROXIMAL SCREWS WERE NOT IMPLANTED SINCE THE FELLOW FELT THE DISTAL ROW FIXATION WAS ADEQUATE AND BELIEVED ALL BEARINGS WERE LOCKED. IT WAS STATED THAT THE PATIENT WAS COMPLIANT WITH POST-OP INSTRUCTIONS. INTRA-OP AND POST-OP X-RAYS WERE PROVIDED BUT PRE-OP X-RAYS COULD NOT BE OBTAINED AND THE DEVICE HAS BEEN DISCARDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22079961 ↗MalfunctionMay 23, 2025Unintended Movement; Device Fell; Unintended Movement; Device Fell
A SALES REP REPORTED ON 29APR2025 THAT WHILE REVIEWING THE POST-OP X-RAYS ON (B)(6) 2025 THE SURGEON NOTICED THE ULNA CORNER BEARING HAD COLLAPSED ON THE VBEAR-11-7S. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INTRA-OP X-RAYS TAKEN ON (B)(6) 2024 LOOK REASONABLE FOR THE 11-HOLE BEARING PLATE AND REVISION SURGERY HAS NOT YET BEEN CONFIRMED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURGERY WAS PERFORMED BY A FELLOW WITH AN EXPERIENCED REP IN THE ROOM, THE PROXIMAL SCREWS WERE NOT IMPLANTED SINCE THE FELLOW FELT THE DISTAL ROW FIXATION WAS ADEQUATE AND BELIEVED ALL BEARINGS WERE LOCKED. IT WAS STATED THAT THE PATIENT WAS COMPLIANT WITH POST-OP INSTRUCTIONS. INTRA-OP AND POST-OP X-RAYS WERE PROVIDED BUT PRE-OP X-RAYS COULD NOT BE OBTAINED AND THE DEVICE REMAINS IMPLANTED UNTIL THE REVISION SURGERY IS SCHEDULED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22079957 ↗MalfunctionMay 23, 2025Unintended Movement; Device Fell; Unintended Movement; Device Fell
A SALES REP REPORTED ON 29APR2025 THAT WHILE REVIEWING POST-OP X-RAYS, THE SURGEON NOTICED THE BEARINGS ON THE VBEAR-3-7S HAD COLLAPSED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INTRA-OP X-RAYS TAKEN ON (B)(6) 2025 LOOKED GOOD FOR THE PLATE AND REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED ON (B)(6) 2025. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ORIGINAL SURGERY WAS PERFORMED BY A FELLOW WITH AN EXPERIENCED REP IN THE ROOM, THE PROXIMAL SCREWS WERE NOT IMPLANTED SINCE THE FELLOW FELT THE DISTAL ROW FIXATION WAS ADEQUATE AND BELIEVED ALL BEARINGS WERE LOCKED. IT WAS STATED THAT THE PATIENT WAS COMPLIANT WITH POST-OP INSTRUCTIONS. INTRA-OP AND POST-OP X-RAYS WERE PROVIDED BUT PRE-OP X-RAYS COULD NOT BE OBTAINED AND THE DEVICE WILL BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22079951 ↗InjuryOct 24, 2024Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress
A REGIONAL SALES MANAGER REPORTED ON 25SEP2024 THAT A REP REPORTED THAT A SURGEON IMPLANTED A TRIMED PLATE (DATE UNKNOWN) AND AFTER THE PATIENT FELL, THEIR RADIUS BROKE PROXIMAL TO THE PLATE. THIS LED TO A REVISION SURGERY (DATE UNKNOWN) AND LARGER PLATE, VLBPL-7-7 WAS IMPLANTED. IT WAS STATED THAT AFTER THE REVISION SURGERY, THE PATIENT FELL AGAIN AND BENT PLATE. ON (B)(6) 2024 THE PLATE WAS REMOVED AND DISCOLORATION OF BONE AND TISSUE WAS EVIDENT. THE SURGEON STATED THAT IT HAD SIMILAR APPEARANCE TO METALOSIS. THE SURGEON ULTIMATELY CHOSE TO IMPLANT ANOTHER PLATE FROM A COMPETITOR. PICTURES WERE PROVIDED, X-RAYS WERE REQUESTED BUT NOT PROVIDED AND THE DEVICE WAS DISCARDED BY THE FACILITY. AS OF 24OCT2024 TRIMED CONTINUES TO REQUEST INFORMATION FROM THE REP TO CLARIFY TIMELINES AND INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE REGIONAL SALES MANAGER AND THE SALES REP.
Patient problems: Fall
MAUDE report 20528418 ↗InjuryOct 10, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Unintended Movement; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Migration; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Unintended Movement; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Migration
SALES REP REPORTED ON 11SEP2024 THAT AFTER AN ORIGINAL CORRECTIVE DISTAL RADIUS OSTEOTOMY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024 THE PATIENT PRESENTED POST OP REQUIRING REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2024. IT WAS STATED THAT THE OSTEOTOMY PERFORMED AND VBEAR-5-7S WAS IMPLANTED AS PER SURGICAL TECHNIQUE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT UPON REVIEW, IT APPEARS THE DISTAL SCREW FIXATION (SCREWS LOCKED INTO THE BEARING) HAVE MOVED INTO FLEXION. THIS MOVEMENT SUBSEQUENTLY MEANT THE BEARING AND SCREW INTERFACE SHIFTED NOT ALLOWING EASY SCREWDRIVER INTERFACE WITH THE SCREW HEAD. THE SCREWS WERE IMPEDED BY THE PLATE ITSELF MAKING EXTRACTION DIFFICULT. ON EXAMINATION THE SCREWS PRESENTED TIGHT AND LOCKED IN THE BEARING. THIS AFFECTED THE 4 DISTAL SCREWS. THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO REMOVE SCREWS AND SUPPLEMENT WITH ADDITIONAL FIXATION. HE ELECTED TO KEEP THE EXISTING VOLAR BEARING PLATE INSITU AND INSERT NEW SCREWS IN THE DISTAL ROW. PROSTHESIS CHOICE, FINAL TECHNIQUE AND FIXATION MADE AT SURGEONS' DISCRETION. THE SURGEON REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH PAIN AND DISCOMFORT POST OP WHICH LED TO FURTHER EXAMINATION/IMAGING AND THUS THE REVISION OPERATION. THE SURGEON WAS UNSURE AT THE TIME OF THE REVISION SURGERY IF
Patient problems: Implant Pain
MAUDE report 20417758 ↗InjurySep 30, 2024Break; Break
SALES REP REPORTED ON 28AUG2024 THAT A SURGEON EXPERIENCED A BEARING POPPED OUT OF A VBEAL-3-7W. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON CHOSE TO LEAVE THE DEVICE IMPLANTED WITHOUT THE BEARING AND THE REP DOES NOT BELIEVE THIS WILL CAUSE THE PATIENT ADDITIONAL HARM. THE REP REPORTED THAT THERE WAS ABOUT A 45-MINUTE DELAY IN SURGERY DUE TO HAVING TO REMOVE THE LOOSE BEARING FROM BEHIND THE PLATE. THE REP ALSO REPORTED THAT THERE IS CURRENTLY NO REPORTED ADVERSE EVENT. NO DEVICE IS AVAILABLE TO BE RETURNED BUT X-RAYS AND A PICTURE WERE PROVIDED. WHEN INITIALLY REVIEWING THE COMPLAINT, WE SAW THAT IT SAID THE SURGEON INDICATED NO ADDITIONAL HARM; HOWEVER, THE DELAY IN SURGERY WAS OVERLOOKED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20340762 ↗MalfunctionNov 28, 2023Off-Label Use; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Off-Label Use; Detachment of Device or Device Component
TRIMED'S MEDICAL ADVISOR REPORTED ON 05NOV2023 THAT A SURGEON INFORMED HIM THAT ON ONE CASE, HE WAS USING A WRIST FIXATION SYSTEM 3 VOLAR BEARING PLATE AND USED A STANDARD BONE SCREW TO PULL THE PLATE UP TO THE BONE. THIS IS NOT ON THE TRIMED SURGICAL TECHNIQUE MANUAL, THEREFORE THIS WAS OFF LABEL USE. WHEN THE SURGEON WENT TO PUT THE PEG IN, HE THINKS THAT THE BEARING MAY HAVE COME OUT OF THE BOTTOM OF THE PLATE, BUT FELT THAT FIXATION WAS EXCELLENT, WAS PLEASED WITH THE RESULT, AND DIDN'T FEEL REMOVAL WAS NEEDED OR NECESSARY. IT HAS BEEN REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAS DONE GREAT AND THIS DID NOT CAUSE ADDITIONAL HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18223020 ↗
Other Trimed, INC. products
All Trimed, INC. devices →Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page