Skip to content

WallFlex™ M00547550Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Stent System · Class 2 · Implant

All models of WallFlex (4)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00191506044497), received between Dec 9, 2025 and Dec 9, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 3 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520263
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Migration3
  • Use of Device Problem3

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 9, 2025Use of Device Problem; Migration; Use of Device Problem; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A WALLFLEX BILIARY PLUS RX STENT SYSTEM COVERED STENT WAS IMPLANTED IN THE BILE DUCT TO TREAT LIVER TRANSPLANT STRICTURE DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. THE PATIENT, WHO HAD A LIVER TRANSPLANT, PRESENTED FOR FOLLOW-UP DUE TO DISTAL MIGRATION OF THE STENT OUT OF THE DUCT, WHICH WAS CONFIRMED UNDER ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) WITH FLUOROSCOPY. FOLLOW UP PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY IMPLANTING A PLASTIC STENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. NOTE: THE WALLFLEX BILIARY PLUS RX STENT SYSTEM WAS IMPLANTED TO TREAT LIVER TRANSPLANT STRICTURES. HOWEVER, PER THE WALLFLEX BILIARY PLUS RX STENT SYSTEM DIRECTIONS FOR USE (DFU), THE STENT INDICATED FOR USE IN THE PALLIATIVE TREATMENT OF BILIARY STRICTURES PRODUCED BY MALIGNANT NEOPLASMS, RELIEF OF MALIGNANT BILIARY OBSTRUCTION PRIOR TO SURGERY AND FOR TREATMENT OF BENIGN BILIARY STRICTURES. THE DEVICE IS NOT INTENDED TO TREAT LIVER TRANSPLANT STRICTURES.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23760636 ↗
  • InjuryDec 9, 2025Use of Device Problem; Migration; Use of Device Problem; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A WALLFLEX BILIARY PLUS RX STENT SYSTEM COVERED STENT WAS IMPLANTED IN THE BILE DUCT TO TREAT LIVER TRANSPLANT STRICTURE DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. THE PATIENT, WHO HAD A LIVER TRANSPLANT, PRESENTED FOR FOLLOW-UP DUE TO DISTAL MIGRATION OF THE STENT OUT OF THE DUCT, WHICH WAS CONFIRMED UNDER ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) WITH FLUOROSCOPY. FOLLOW UP PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY IMPLANTING A PLASTIC STENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. NOTE: THE WALLFLEX BILIARY PLUS RX STENT SYSTEM WAS IMPLANTED TO TREAT LIVER TRANSPLANT STRICTURES. HOWEVER, PER THE WALLFLEX BILIARY PLUS RX STENT SYSTEM DIRECTIONS FOR USE (DFU), THE STENT INDICATED FOR USE IN THE PALLIATIVE TREATMENT OF BILIARY STRICTURES PRODUCED BY MALIGNANT NEOPLASMS, RELIEF OF MALIGNANT BILIARY OBSTRUCTION PRIOR TO SURGERY AND FOR TREATMENT OF BENIGN BILIARY STRICTURES. THE DEVICE IS NOT INTENDED TO TREAT LIVER TRANSPLANT STRICTURES.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23760504 ↗
  • InjuryDec 9, 2025Use of Device Problem; Migration; Use of Device Problem; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A WALLFLEX BILIARY PLUS RX STENT SYSTEM COVERED STENT WAS IMPLANTED IN THE BILE DUCT TO TREAT LIVER TRANSPLANT STRICTURE DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. THE PATIENT, WHO HAD A LIVER TRANSPLANT, PRESENTED FOR FOLLOW-UP DUE TO DISTAL MIGRATION OF THE STENT OUT OF THE DUCT, WHICH WAS CONFIRMED UNDER ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) WITH FLUOROSCOPY. FOLLOW UP PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY IMPLANTING A PLASTIC STENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. NOTE: THE WALLFLEX BILIARY PLUS RX STENT SYSTEM WAS IMPLANTED TO TREAT LIVER TRANSPLANT STRICTURES. HOWEVER, PER THE WALLFLEX BILIARY PLUS RX STENT SYSTEM DIRECTIONS FOR USE (DFU), THE STENT INDICATED FOR USE IN THE PALLIATIVE TREATMENT OF BILIARY STRICTURES PRODUCED BY MALIGNANT NEOPLASMS, RELIEF OF MALIGNANT BILIARY OBSTRUCTION PRIOR TO SURGERY AND FOR TREATMENT OF BENIGN BILIARY STRICTURES. THE DEVICE IS NOT INTENDED TO TREAT LIVER TRANSPLANT STRICTURES.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23760503 ↗

Other Stents, drains and dilators for the biliary ducts devices

All Stents, drains and dilators for the biliary ducts devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page