Intergard IGW0010-30Recalls & reported problems
Intervascular Sas · Intergard Woven Straight Collagen Coated Vascular Graft · Class 2 · Implant
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00384401000051), received between Nov 21, 2022 and Dec 5, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Insufficient Device Problem Information2
- Material Frayed1
Patient problems
- Ischemia Stroke2
- Quadriplegia2
- Syncope/Fainting2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 5, 2024Material Frayed; Material Frayed
IT WAS REPORTED TO INTERVASCULAR FROM A FOREIGN AUTHORITY REPORT (NMPA) THAT BOTH ENDS OF THE GRAFT THREAD FRAYED, AND THE GRAFT WAS REPLACED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED INDICATED THAT, ACCORDING TO THE SALES TEAM INVESTIGATION, THIS ISSUE OCCURRED BECAUSE THE SURGEON "TOOK THE WRONG PRODUCT. THIS SURGERY SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE WITH A DIFFERENT BRAND". THE MATERIAL AND THE USAGE OF THE OTHER BRAND'S GRAFT ARE DIFFERENT FROM INTERVASCULAR'S. THEREFORE, WHEN THEY CUT THE GRAFT, THERE WAS SOME LOOSENING AT BOTH ENDS OF THE GRAFT. THE SURGEON REALIZED THAT IT WASN¿T THE GRAFT THEY WANTED TO USE, AND THEN SWITCHED TO ANOTHER BRAND. THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT, AND NO PICTURE OF THE GRAFT WAS PROVIDED. THE PRODUCT WON¿T BE RETURNED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20855539 ↗InjuryNov 22, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS INITIALLY REPORTED TO INTERVASCULAR THAT: "THE CLINIC REPORTED FOUR CASES OF ISCHEMIC STROKE (MULTIPLE EMBOLIZATION) TO THE DISTRIBUTOR OF OUR PRODUCTS AFTER A BRACHIOCEPHALIC ARTERY REPLACEMENT (SUBCLAVIAN ARTERY, LEFT INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY AND BRACHIOCEPHALIC TRUNK) WITH INTERGARD PROSTHESES. THUS, ALL FOUR PATIENTS WERE USED ALL THREE TYPES OF PROSTHESES, 10 CM EACH: REF (B)(4). OPERATIONS WERE PERFORMED UNDER CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS WITH HIGH HEPARINIZATION AND FLOW THROUGH THE PROSTHESIS. ALL PATIENTS ARE ALIVE AND ARE CURRENTLY IN ICU. THEY STARTED WORKING WITH INTERGARD PROSTHESES FROM THE END OF (B)(6) 2022. PREVIOUSLY, VASCUTEC PROSTHESES WERE USED FOR THIS TYPE OF PROSTHETICS (20 PATIENTS, WHILE USING READY-MADE MULTI-BRANCH PROSTHESES), THERE WERE NO COMPLICATIONS. STROKES WERE DIAGNOSED THE NEXT DAY AFTER SURGERY. ALL FOUR CASES IN OCTOBER (AGE, SEX, DATES OF OPERATIONS COULD NOT BE NAMED). OPERATING SURGEONS ARE DIFFERENT. AFTER A SERIES OF COMPLICATIONS, IT WAS DECIDED TO CONDUCT AN EXPERIMENT WITH AN IN-VITRO PROSTHESIS.THEY OPENED A NEW PACKAGE, SOAKED IN A SOLUTION OF RIFAMPICIN, SAW AN UNEVEN COATING OF COLLAGEN, WITH A MAXIMUM ACCUMULATION OF COLLAGEN IN
Patient problems: Ischemia Stroke; Quadriplegia; Syncope/Fainting
MAUDE report 15846811 ↗InjuryNov 21, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS INITIALLY REPORTED TO INTERVASCULAR THAT: "THE CLINIC REPORTED FOUR CASES OF ISCHEMIC STROKE (MULTIPLE EMBOLIZATION) TO THE DISTRIBUTOR OF OUR PRODUCTS AFTER A BRACHIOCEPHALIC ARTERY REPLACEMENT (SUBCLAVIAN ARTERY, LEFT INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY AND BRACHIOCEPHALIC TRUNK) WITH INTERGARD PROSTHESES. THUS, ALL FOUR PATIENTS WERE USED ALL THREE TYPES OF PROSTHESES, 10 CM EACH: REF IGW0012-30, REF IGW0010-30, IGW0008-30. OPERATIONS WERE PERFORMED UNDER CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS WITH HIGH HEPARINIZATION AND FLOW THROUGH THE PROSTHESIS. ALL PATIENTS ARE ALIVE AND ARE CURRENTLY IN ICU. THEY STARTED WORKING WITH INTERGARD PROSTHESES FROM THE END OF ON (B)(6) 2022. PREVIOUSLY, VASCUTEC PROSTHESES WERE USED FOR THIS TYPE OF PROSTHETICS (20 PATIENTS, WHILE USING READY-MADE MULTI-BRANCH PROSTHESES), THERE WERE NO COMPLICATIONS. STROKES WERE DIAGNOSED THE NEXT DAY AFTER SURGERY. ALL FOUR CASES IN OCTOBER (AGE, SEX, DATES OF OPERATIONS COULD NOT BE NAMED). OPERATING SURGEONS ARE DIFFERENT. AFTER A SERIES OF COMPLICATIONS, IT WAS DECIDED TO CONDUCT AN EXPERIMENT WITH AN IN-VITRO PROSTHESIS. THEY OPENED A NEW PACKAGE, SOAKED IN A SOLUTION OF RIFAMPICIN, SAW AN UNEVEN COATING OF COLLAGEN, WITH A
Patient problems: Ischemia Stroke; Quadriplegia; Syncope/Fainting
MAUDE report 15835058 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Vascular Graft, Of 6mm And Greater Diameter devices
- Cardioroot HEWROOT0030Intervascular Sas · Prosthesis, Vascular Graft, Of 6mm And Greater Diameter1 recall2 deaths13 reports
- FLIXENE SLIDER GDS 25058Atrium Medical Corporation · PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT, OF 6MM AND GREATER DIAMETER1 recall13 reports
- ADVANTA SLIDER GDS 22114Atrium Medical Corporation · PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT, OF 6MM AND GREATER DIAMETER1 recall11 reports
- Cardioroot HEWROOT0032Intervascular Sas · Prosthesis, Vascular Graft, Of 6mm And Greater Diameter1 recall2 deaths10 reports
- FLIXENE SLIDER GDS 25129Atrium Medical Corporation · PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT, OF 6MM AND GREATER DIAMETER1 recall9 reports
- FLIXENE SLIDER GDS 25137Atrium Medical Corporation · PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT, OF 6MM AND GREATER DIAMETER1 recall8 reports
- ADVANTA SLIDER GDS 22222Atrium Medical Corporation · PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT, OF 6MM AND GREATER DIAMETER1 recall8 reports
- FLIXENE SLIDER GDS 25138Atrium Medical Corporation · PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT, OF 6MM AND GREATER DIAMETER1 recall7 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.