Hemagard HGKAX100808RS35/20Recalls & reported problems
Intervascular Sas · Hemagard Knitted Axillo-bifemoral Radially Supported Collagen Coated Vascular Graft · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Hemagard (28)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 6
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00384401014461), received between Aug 8, 2019 and Jun 18, 2024 — classified as 6 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (4 reports).
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K964625); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Insufficient Device Problem Information4
- Use of Device Problem4
- Leak/Splash1
- Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem1
- Nonstandard Device1
Patient problems
- Insufficient Information4
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- Blood Loss1
- No Code Available1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 18, 2024Use of Device Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Use of Device Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED TO INTERVASCULAR THAT "A PATIENT HAD BEEN RECEIVED IN EMERGENCY AND HAD ALREADY UNDERGONE EVAR AND FEM FEM CROSSOVER. A FIRST GRAFT WAS TUNNELED, THERE WAS SOME TUGGING/ MANIPULATION TO GET IT IN SITU, BUT THE GRAFT WAS LEAKING HEAVILY AND JUST SEEMED REALLY POROUS WHEN FLUSHED. THE FIRST GRAFT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER PRODUCT FROM THE SAME MODEL. ALTHOUGH THERE WAS NO TUGGING AND VERY CAREFUL PLACEMENT, THE SAME THING HAPPENED, ALTHOUGH NOT AS MUCH AS THE FIRST GRAFT. THE SECOND GRAFT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A STRAIGHT REINFORCED FROM A DIFFERENT MANUFACTURER.¿. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE EVENT INVOLVED TWO DEVICES, THE SECOND GRAFT ALSO BEING THE SUBJECT OF AN INITIAL EMDR. COMPLAINT #(B)(4).
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19564010 ↗InjuryJun 18, 2024Use of Device Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Use of Device Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED TO INTERVASCULAR THAT "A PATIENT HAD BEEN RECEIVED IN EMERGENCY AND HAD ALREADY UNDERGONE EVAR AND FEM CROSSOVER. A FIRST GRAFT WAS TUNNELED, THERE WAS SOME TUGGING/ MANIPULATION TO GET IT IN SITU, BUT THE GRAFT WAS LEAKING HEAVILY AND JUST SEEMED REALLY POROUS WHEN FLUSHED. THE FIRST GRAFT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER PRODUCT FROM THE SAME MODEL. ALTHOUGH THERE WAS NO TUGGING AND VERY CAREFUL PLACEMENT, THE SAME THING HAPPENED, ALTHOUGH NOT AS MUCH AS THE FIRST GRAFT. THE SECOND GRAFT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A STRAIGHT REINFORCED FROM A DIFFERENT MANUFACTURER.¿. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE EVENT INVOLVED TWO DEVICES, THE SECOND GRAFT ALSO BEING THE SUBJECT OF AN INITIAL EMDR. COMPLAINT #(B)(4).
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19563856 ↗InjuryJun 14, 2024Use of Device Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Use of Device Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED TO INTERVASCULAR THAT "A PATIENT HAD BEEN RECEIVED IN EMERGENCY AND HAD ALREADY UNDERGONE EVAR AND FEM FEM CROSSOVER. A FIRST GRAFT WAS TUNNELED, THERE WAS SOME TUGGING/ MANIPULATION TO GET IT IN SITU, BUT THE GRAFT WAS LEAKING HEAVILY AND JUST SEEMED REALLY POROUS WHEN FLUSHED. THE FIRST GRAFT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER PRODUCT FROM THE SAME MODEL. ALTHOUGH THERE WAS NO TUGGING AND VERY CAREFUL PLACEMENT, THE SAME THING HAPPENED, ALTHOUGH NOT AS MUCH AS THE FIRST GRAFT. THE SECOND GRAFT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A STRAIGHT REINFORCED FROM A DIFFERENT MANUFACTURER.¿ IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE EVENT INVOLVED TWO DEVICES, THE SECOND GRAFT ALSO BEING THE SUBJECT OF AN INITIAL EMDR. COMPLAINT #(B)(4).
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19537368 ↗InjuryJun 14, 2024Use of Device Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Use of Device Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information
COMPLAINT #(B)(4).
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19537307 ↗InjuryDec 4, 2019Leak/Splash
WE RECEIVED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM THE MHRA REPORT FILLED BY THE HOSPITAL CONCERNING THE EVENT: THE PATIENT REQUIRED AN EMERGENCY AXILLLO-BIFEMORAL GRAFT. A SMALL SEGMENT OF THE GRAFT WAS VERY POROUS. THE SEGMENT WAS EXCISED AND PRESERVED IN WATER BY THEATRE TEAM. THERE WERE NO SIGNIFICANT EXTRA BLOOD LOSS AND NO IMPACT ON PATIENT OUTCOME. THE INCIDENT OCCURRED ON (B)(6)2019 . THEREFORE THE GRAFT WAS NOT USED AFTER ITS EXPIRY SINCE THE EVENT TOOK PLACE ON JUNE, 29TH, 2019 AND NOT ON (B)(6)2019 AS IT WAS INITIALLY REPORTED. WE ALSO LEARNED LATER THAT THE HOSPITAL DISCARDED THE EXCISED SEGMENT BEFORE WE COULD OBTAIN IT.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 9409460 ↗InjuryAug 8, 2019Nonstandard Device; Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem; Nonstandard Device; Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem
WE RECEIVED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM THE MHRA REPORT FILLED BY THE HOSPITAL CONCERNING THE EVENT: THE PATIENT REQUIRED AN EMERGENCY AXILLLO-BIFEMORAL GRAFT. A SMALL SEGMENT OF THE GRAFT WAS VERY POROUS. THE SEGMENT WAS EXCISED AND PRESERVED IN WATER BY THEATRE TEAM. THERE WERE NO SIGNIFICANT EXTRA BLOOD LOSS AND NO IMPACT ON PATIENT OUTCOME. THE INCIDENT OCCURRED ON (B)(6) 2019. THEREFORE THE GRAFT WAS NOT USED AFTER ITS EXPIRY SINCE THE EVENT TOOK PLACE ON (B)(6)2019 AS IT WAS INITIALLY REPORTED. WE ALSO LEARNED LATER THAT THE HOSPITAL DISCARDED THE EXCISED SEGMENT BEFORE WE COULD OBTAIN IT.
Patient problems: Blood Loss
MAUDE report 8873752 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K964625. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-1427-2010 · Dec 9, 2009 · TerminatedInterGard Knitted Collagen Coated Vascular prostheses, Catalog number: IGK1206. InterVascular SAS, France. Indicated for surgical repair, bypass or replacement of arteries in th
- Z-1439-2010 · Dec 9, 2009 · TerminatedInterGard Knitted Collagen Coated Vascular prostheses marketed under 510(k) # K964625; InterGard Woven Collagen Coated Vascular prostheses marketed under 510(k} #K970843 and K9842
Other Prosthesis, Vascular Graft, Of 6mm And Greater Diameter devices
- Cardioroot HEWROOT0030Intervascular Sas · Prosthesis, Vascular Graft, Of 6mm And Greater Diameter1 recall2 deaths13 reports
- FLIXENE SLIDER GDS 25058Atrium Medical Corporation · PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT, OF 6MM AND GREATER DIAMETER1 recall13 reports
- ADVANTA SLIDER GDS 22114Atrium Medical Corporation · PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT, OF 6MM AND GREATER DIAMETER1 recall11 reports
- Cardioroot HEWROOT0032Intervascular Sas · Prosthesis, Vascular Graft, Of 6mm And Greater Diameter1 recall2 deaths10 reports
- FLIXENE SLIDER GDS 25129Atrium Medical Corporation · PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT, OF 6MM AND GREATER DIAMETER1 recall9 reports
- ADVANTA SLIDER GDS 22222Atrium Medical Corporation · PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT, OF 6MM AND GREATER DIAMETER1 recall8 reports
- FLIXENE SLIDER GDS 25137Atrium Medical Corporation · PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT, OF 6MM AND GREATER DIAMETER1 recall8 reports
- FLIXENE SLIDER GDS 25138Atrium Medical Corporation · PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT, OF 6MM AND GREATER DIAMETER1 recall7 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page