Skip to content

PRESTIGE® LP Cervical Disc System 6972870Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · PRESTIGE LP DISC 7X18MM · Class 3 · Implant

All models of PRESTIGE LP Cervical Disc System (11)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00613994493620), received between Jun 17, 2019 and Aug 29, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (2 reports).

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P090029); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Migration2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Pain Relief1
  • Neck Pain1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Stenosis1
  • Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 29, 2025Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Migration; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Migration

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES (MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE, HEALTHCARE PROVIDER, CLINICAL STUDY) REGARDING AN EVENT WHICH OCCURRED POST A CLINICAL STUDY (STUDY ID: (B)(4) SPINAL FUSION PROCEDURE IN A PATIENT (PATIENT ID: (B)(6). PATIENT MEDICAL HISTORY: ARTHRITIS, HYPERLIPIDEMIA, HYPERTENSION IT WAS REPORTED THAT, POST CRANIAL SPINE SURGERY C6-C7, AS PER INVESTIGATOR ASSESSMENT IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT IMPLANTED DEVICES DOES NOT APPEAR STABLE AND SECURE. THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED EVIDENCE OF IMPLANT SUBSIDENCE POSTOPERATIVELY. THE EVENT IS SUSPECTED TO BE DEVICE-RELATED DUE TO ANATOMICAL AND BIOMECHANICAL MISMATCH. THE PATIENT IS APPROXIMATELY 7 FEET TALL, AND THE LARGEST AVAILABLE IMPLANT WAS USED; HOWEVER, IT DID NOT PROVIDE FULL ENDPLATE COVERAGE AND RESULTED IN AN ANTERIOR SHIFT OF THE CENTRE OF ROTATION. THIS SUBOPTIMAL IMPLANT POSITIONING AND SIZE MAY HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO INCREASED AXIAL LOAD CONCENTRATION AND INADEQUATE LOAD DISTRIBUTION ACROSS THE ENDPLATE, LEADING TO IMPLANT SETTLING OR SINKING (SUBSIDENCE) INTO THE VERTEBRAL BODY. THE SUBSIDENCE WAS NOT IMMEDIATELY EVIDENT INTRAOPERATIVELY BUT WAS LATER CONFIRMED ON FOLLOW-UP IMAGING OBTAINED AT THE 1-MONTH FOL

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22920420 ↗
  • InjuryJul 6, 2020Migration; Migration

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL VIA MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT WITH AN UNKNOWN INDICATION IN NEED C6-7 ARTHROPLASTY USED IN SPINAL THERAPY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT RECESSED POSTERIOR A LITTLE BIT AFTER SOME TIME. THE PATIENT PRESENTED NEW SYMPTOMS AND THE SURGEON DETERMINED AND EXPLANT THE DEVICE. THE DEVICE WAS REPLACED. THERE WERE NO FRAGMENTS IN THE PATIENT REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: Stenosis; Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected

    MAUDE report 10231334 ↗
  • InjuryJun 17, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    PRE-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS (IMPLANT SURGERY): MYELORADICULOPATHY TREATED LEVEL: C6-C7 REASON FOR EXPLANTATION: PERSISTENT PAIN SURGICAL SITE DESCRIPTION: SCAR TISSUE WAS PRESENT, INTEGRITY OF DEVICE WAS INTACT. IN THE REVISION SURGERY, FUSION WAS PERFORMED WITH PLATE AND INTERBODY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Pain Relief; Neck Pain

    MAUDE report 8703863 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under P090029. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-1641-2018 · Mar 13, 2018 · Terminated
    Medtronic Prestige LP(TM) Cervical Disc System with Streamlined Instruments, DRILL GUIDES: a) REF 6975205, 5mm b) REF 6975206, 6mm c) REF 6975207, 7mm Product Usage: The PRESTIGE

Other PROSTHESIS, INTERVERTEBRAL DISC devices

All PROSTHESIS, INTERVERTEBRAL DISC devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page