Paradigm® REAL-Time Revel™ MMT-723NAH (UDI 00613994743909)Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic Minimed, Inc. · PUMP MMT-723NAH PRDGM INS V2.3 PK EN · Class 3
All models of Paradigm REAL-Time Revel (180)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This is a Medtronic MiniMed Paradigm Revel insulin pump. The 42 reports mostly describe the pump showing error messages, failing to cycle or prime, blank screens, and parts loosening or sticking out; some mention insulin not being delivered, which led to high blood sugar and, in a few cases, hospitalizations for diabetic ketoacidosis. There are 13 reports of injury and no deaths. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 42
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 13
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 42 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00613994743909), received between Jun 29, 2017 and Jul 10, 2020 — classified as 13 injuries, 29 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Displays Incorrect Message” (14 reports).
14 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P980022); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Displays Incorrect Message14
- Failure to Cycle6
- Mechanical Problem5
- No Display/Image5
- Detachment of Device or Device Component4
- Material Protrusion/Extrusion4
- Patient Device Interaction Problem4
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available3
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient26
- Hyperglycemia13
- Hypoglycemia2
- Blood Loss1
- Dyspnea1
- Elevated Ketones/ Diabetic Ketoacidosis1
- No Code Available1
- Vomiting1
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 42 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 10, 2020Insufficient Flow or Under Infusion; Insufficient Flow or Under Infusion
INFORMATION RECEIVED BY MEDTRONIC INDICATED THAT THE INSULIN PUMP SOMETIMES DID NOT DELIVER INSULIN. NO HARM REQUIRING MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED. THE INSULIN PUMP AND RESERVOIR WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10256184 ↗InjuryMay 27, 2020Mechanical Problem; Detachment of Device or Device Component; No Apparent Adverse Event; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Mechanical Problem; Detachment of Device or Device Component; No Apparent Adverse Event; Patient Device Interaction Problem
CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THEY WERE HOSPITALIZED ON MAY 18 DUE TO HYPERGLYCEMIA AND DIABETIC KETOACIDOSIS. CUSTOMERS BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS 580 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF HOSPITALIZATION. CUSTOMER HAS BEEN USING INSULIN PUMP SYSTEM WITHIN 48 HOURS OF REPORTED HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL. CUSTOMER DECLINED TROUBLESHOOTING. CUSTOMER EXPERIENCED SYMPTOMS SUCH AS SHORT OF BREATH AND VOMITING. CUSTOMER WAS TREATED WITH INTRAVENOUS FLUID AND INSULIN DRIP. CUSTOMER DECLINED TO PERFORM A CARELINK UPLOAD. CUSTOMER STATED THAT DRIVE SUPPORT WAS FLUSH. CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT INSULIN PUMP HAD MOTOR ERROR AND TRIED REWINDING BUT DID NOT WORK. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS WHILE THE RESERVOIR WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Dyspnea; Elevated Ketones/ Diabetic Ketoacidosis; Hyperglycemia; Vomiting
MAUDE report 10091095 ↗MalfunctionMay 5, 2020Use of Device Problem; Power Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Priming Problem; Use of Device Problem; Power Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Priming Problem
INFORMATION RECEIVED BY MEDTRONIC INDICATED THAT THE INSULIN PUMP HAD DIMINISHED BATTERY LIFE, LOST INSULIN PUMP SETTING, DATE AND TIME DURING BATTERY WAS CHANGE, CRACK ON TOP CORNER OF INSULIN PUMP SCREEN, MULTIPLE PRIMING NEEDED TO GET TUBING TO FILL. NO HARM REQUIRING MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10023025 ↗MalfunctionApr 29, 2020Failure to Cycle; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Failure to Cycle; Detachment of Device or Device Component
INFORMATION RECEIVED BY MEDTRONIC INDICATED THAT THE INSULIN PUMP HAD A COMPROMISED FORCE SENSOR SYSTEM ALARM AND DRIVE SUPPORT CAP WAS STICKING OUT. NO HARM REQUIRING MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10008424 ↗MalfunctionFeb 25, 2020Failure to Cycle; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Failure to Cycle; Detachment of Device or Device Component
INFORMATION RECEIVED BY MEDTRONIC INDICATED THAT THE INSULIN PUMP HAD COMPROMISED FORCE SENSOR SYSTEM ERROR DURING PRIMING. CUSTOMER STATED THAT THE INSULIN WAS SQUIRTING OUT. CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE DRIVE SUPPORT CAP WAS STICKING OUT. NO HARM REQUIRING MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED. THE DEVICE WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9749608 ↗MalfunctionDec 26, 2019Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE INSULIN PUMP HAD MOTOR ERROR ALARMS AND REWIND WAS LOUDER AND SLOWER. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS UNKNOWN. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9518176 ↗InjuryDec 18, 2019Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
CUSTOMER'S HUSBAND REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT INSULIN PUMP HAD MOTOR ERROR ALARM. CUSTOMER ALSO REPORTED THAT HIS WIFE EXPERIENCED HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL OF 485 MG/DL. CUSTOMER HAD NOT BEEN USING INSULIN PUMP SYSTEM WITHIN 48 HOURS OF REPORTED HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE EVENT. THE CUSTOMER ASKED ABOUT ASSISTANCE ON HOW TO ADMINISTER BOLUS. THE INSULIN PUMP WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Hyperglycemia
MAUDE report 9485997 ↗MalfunctionDec 16, 2019Mechanical Problem; Obstruction of Flow; Mechanical Problem; Obstruction of Flow
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE INSULIN PUMP HAD MOTOR ERROR. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS UNKNOWN AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT. THE CUSTOMER DECLINED TROUBLESHOOTING FOR MOTOR ERROR. INSULIN PUMP HAD TO CONSTANTLY REWIND OR RE PRIME MULTIPLE TIMES, HAD NO DELIVERY ALARM. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9471961 ↗InjuryNov 25, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
CUSTOMER¿S HUSBAND REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE CUSTOMER EXPERIENCED A HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE. CUSTOMER¿S HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE VALUE WAS OVER 600 MG/DL. CUSTOMER WAS ADVISE TO MONITOR THE BLOOD GLUCOSE AND IF AFTER 30 TO 45 MINUTES IF IT¿S STILL OVER 600 MG/DL THEN CALL HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL FOR SUGGESTION HOW MUCH MANUAL INJECTION TO TAKE. CUSTOMER DECLINE TROUBLESHOOTING FOR HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE. THE DEVICE WILL NOT RETURN FOR THE ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Hyperglycemia
MAUDE report 9368152 ↗MalfunctionSep 18, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE FOLLOWING DEVICE WERE OR MAY BE THE SUBJECT OF LITIGATION. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS UNKNOWN. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE UNDER THIS LEGAL HOLD MAY NOT BE DESTRUCTIVELY ANALYZED WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE CORPORATE LITIGATION DEPARTMENT. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9080133 ↗MalfunctionAug 13, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Patient Device Interaction Problem
CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE DRIVE SUPPORT CAP POPS OUT DURING REWIND AND BUTTONS COVER WAS BROKEN. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS UNKNOWN. CUSTOMER STATED INSULIN PUMP WAS DAMAGE AND HELD TOGETHER BY TAPE. CUSTOMER STATED THAT NO PHYSICAL DAMAGED TO THE RESERVOIR LIP RING. THE DEVICE WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8887182 ↗InjuryJun 14, 2019Device Difficult to Program or Calibrate; No Apparent Adverse Event; Device Difficult to Program or Calibrate; No Apparent Adverse Event
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THEY EXPERIENCED HYPERGLYCEMIA AND THE ACT BUTTON WAS NOT RESPONDING. THE CUSTOMER'S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS 555 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT AND WAS TREATED WITH MANUAL INJECTIONS. THE CUSTOMER DECLINED TROUBLESHOOTING FOR HIGH GLUCOSE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CUSTOMER REWOUND THE INSULIN PUMP, BUT AFTER THE INSULIN PUMP REWOUND THE INSULIN PUMP WAS NOT RESPONDING TO THE ACT BUTTON TO PRIME. THE CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED TO DISCONTINUE USE OF THE INSULIN PUMP AND TO REVERT TO THE BACK-UP PLAN. THE DEVICE WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Hyperglycemia
MAUDE report 8698938 ↗InjuryJun 4, 2019Failure to Cycle; No Apparent Adverse Event; Failure to Cycle; No Apparent Adverse Event
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THEY EXPERIENCED THE HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE. THE CUSTOMER BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS 400 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF INCIDENT. THE CUSTOMER STATED THAT THE INSULIN PUMP HAD COMPROMISED FORCE SENSOR SYSTEM ALARM. THE CUSTOMER STATES THAT THE DRIVE SUPPORT CAP APPEARS NORMAL. THE CUSTOMER DECLINED THE TROUBLESHOOTING FOR HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE. THE CUSTOMER DID NOT PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION REGARDING SYMPTOMS AND TREATMENT FOR THEIR HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE. THE CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED TO DISCONTINUE USE OF THE INSULIN PUMP AND TO REVERT TO THE BACK-UP PLAN. THE CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED THE PUMP WILL BE REPLACED AS PER TROUBLESHOOT. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Hyperglycemia
MAUDE report 8665287 ↗MalfunctionMay 1, 2019Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
THE CUSTOMER'S MOTHER REPORTED VIA PHONE THAT THE INSULIN PUMP HAD MOTOR ERROR ALARM. CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS UNKNOWN AT THE TIME OF INCIDENT. CUSTOMER WAS ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY CLEAR THE ALARM ALSO ABLE TO COMPLETE PUMP REWIND. CUSTOMER STATED THE DRIVE SUPPORT CAP APPEARS NORMAL. CUSTOMER STATED IN THE ALARM HISTORY INSULIN PUMP HAD MOTOR POSITION ENCODER ERROR ALARM ALSO MORE THAN ONE MOTOR ERROR ALARM WITHIN A 30-DAY PERIOD. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8567719 ↗MalfunctionFeb 18, 2019Connection Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Connection Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE RESERVOIR WAS NOT ABLE TO LOCK IN PLACE WHEN INSERTED INTO INSULIN PUMP. CUSTOMER'S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS 164 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT. THE CUSTOMER WAS ASSISTED WITH TROUBLESHOOTING. THE CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED TO DISCONTINUE USE OF THE INSULIN PUMP AND TO REVERT TO THE BACK-UP PLAN. THE DEVICE WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8346931 ↗MalfunctionFeb 5, 2019Failure to Cycle; Failure to Cycle
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE INSULIN PUMP ALARMED COMPROMISED FORCE SENSOR SYSTEM. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS 155 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT. THE CUSTOMER STATED THAT THE DRIVE SUPPORT CAP WAS APPEARS NORMAL. THE CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED THAT THE INSULIN PUMP NEEDED TO BE REPLACED AND WAS ADVISED TO DISCONTINUE USE OF THE INSULIN PUMP AND TO REVERT TO THE BACKUP PLAN. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8307242 ↗MalfunctionNov 8, 2018Failure to Cycle; Failure to Cycle
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE INSULIN PUMP HAD RECEIVED NOT STOP SQUIRTING INSULIN OUT OF THE TUBING DURING PRIMING. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS UNKNOWN. CUSTOMER STATED THAT THE INSULIN PUMP HAD TO TAKE OUT THE BATTERY OF THE INSULIN PUMP TO GET IT TO STOP AND SHE WAS TRIED TO START THE INSULIN PUMP AGAIN THREE TIMES BUT SAME THING HAPPENED AGAIN. CUSTOMER ALSO STATED THAT THE INSULIN PUMP WAS OFF. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8050120 ↗MalfunctionSep 21, 2018Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE DRIVE SUPPORT CAP WAS DAMAGED. THE CUSTOMER'S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS 244 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF INCIDENT. CUSTOMER STATES THAT MOTOR HAD BEEN POPPING OUT OF THE PUMP TROUBLESHOOTING WAS PERFORMED. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7897441 ↗MalfunctionAug 27, 2018Failure to Cycle; Failure to Cycle
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE INSULIN PUMP ALARMED COMPROMISED FORCE SENSOR SYSTEM. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS UNKNOWN AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT. THE CUSTOMER ALSO REPORTED THAT THE INSULIN WAS SQUIRTING DURING MANUAL PRIME PROCESS. THE CUSTOMER STATED THAT THE DRIVE SUPPORT CAP WAS NORMAL. THE CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED THAT THE INSULIN PUMP NEEDED TO BE REPLACED AND WAS ADVISED TO DISCONTINUE USE OF THE INSULIN PUMP AND TO REVERT TO THE BACKUP PLAN. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7815802 ↗MalfunctionJul 19, 2018Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT INSULIN PUMP HAD NO DELIVERY ALARM. THE BLOOD GLUCOSE AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT WAS 376 MG/DL. THE DEVICE WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Hyperglycemia
MAUDE report 7705266 ↗MalfunctionJun 22, 2018Crack; Application Interface Becomes Non-Functional Or Program Exits Abnormally; Fluid/Blood Leak; Device Displays Incorrect Message; Battery Problem
CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE INSULIN PUMP HAD SEVERAL ISSUES. CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS UNKNOWN AT THE TIME OF INCIDENT. CUSTOMER REPORTED CRACKS AND CHIPPING IN THE INSULIN PUMP CASING AND RESERVOIR COMPARTMENT, INSULIN SQUIRTS OUT, DURING PRIMING, HAD A FAILED BATTERY TEST ALARM AND THE BUTTONS WERE LESS RESPONSIVE. NO TROUBLESHOOTING WAS PERFORMED. INSULIN PUMP IS NOT EXPECTED TO RETURN FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7628908 ↗InjuryJun 5, 2018Fluid/Blood Leak; Device Displays Incorrect Message; Material Protrusion/Extrusion
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE INSULIN PUMP ALARMED COMPROMISED FORCE SENSOR SYSTEM. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS 334 MG/DL. THE CUSTOMER ALSO REPORTED THAT THE INSULIN WAS SQUIRTING DURING MANUAL PRIME PROCESS. TROUBLESHOOTING WAS PERFORMED FOR PRIME REWIND. THE DRIVE SUPPORT CAP WAS PROTRUDED. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Hyperglycemia
MAUDE report 7568320 ↗MalfunctionFeb 6, 2018Sticking
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE INSULIN PUMP ALARMED COMPROMISED FORCE SENSOR SYSTEM. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS 194 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT. THE CUSTOMER STATED THAT THE DRIVE SUPPORT CAP WAS STICKING OUT. THE CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED THAT THE INSULIN PUMP NEEDED TO BE REPLACED AND WAS ADVISED TO DISCONTINUE USE OF THE INSULIN PUMP AND TO REVERT TO THE BACKUP PLAN. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7246484 ↗MalfunctionFeb 6, 2018Device Displays Incorrect Message
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE INSULIN PUMP WAS DIED WITHOUT WARNING. THE CUSTOMER'S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS UNKNOWN. THE CUSTOMER WAS NOT ABLE TO DO ANY TROUBLESHOOTING. INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7245043 ↗InjuryFeb 2, 2018Device Displays Incorrect Message
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THEY GOT ERROR ALARMS ON INSULIN PUMP. THE CUSTOMER'S BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS 468 MG/DL. CUSTOMER STATED THE ALARM DID NOT OCCUR RIGHT AFTER A BATTERY CHANGE. THE CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED TO DISCONTINUE USE OF THE INSULIN PUMP AND TO REVERT TO THE BACK-UP PLAN. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Hyperglycemia
MAUDE report 7235348 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under P980022. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-1749-2026 · Feb 13, 2026 · Open, ClassifiedParadigm REAL-Time Insulin Pump (MMT-522, MMT-722)
- Z-1750-2026 · Feb 13, 2026 · Open, ClassifiedParadigm REAL-Time Revel Insulin Pump (MMT-523, MMT-723)
- Z-1256-2025 · Jan 31, 2025 · Open, ClassifiedParadigm insulin pump, REF: MMT-522, MMT-523, MMT-551, MMT-722, MMT-723, MMT-751
- Z-1589-2020 · Jun 27, 2019 · Open, ClassifiedMedtronic MiniMed Paradigm Insulin pump, model number MMT-522K
- Z-1592-2020 · Jun 27, 2019 · Open, ClassifiedMedtronic MiniMed Paradigm Insulin pump, model number MMT-523K
- Z-1587-2020 · Jun 27, 2019 · Open, ClassifiedMedtronic MiniMed Paradigm Insulin pump, model number MMT-522
- Z-1593-2020 · Jun 27, 2019 · Open, ClassifiedMedtronic MiniMed Paradigm Insulin pump, model number MMT-723K
- Z-1594-2020 · Jun 27, 2019 · Open, ClassifiedMedtronic MiniMed Paradigm Insulin pump, model number MMT-723
- Z-1590-2020 · Jun 27, 2019 · Open, ClassifiedMedtronic MiniMed Paradigm Insulin pump, model number MMT-722K
- Z-1591-2020 · Jun 27, 2019 · Open, ClassifiedMedtronic MiniMed Paradigm Insulin pump, model number MMT-523
- Z-1588-2020 · Jun 27, 2019 · Open, ClassifiedMedtronic MiniMed Paradigm Insulin pump, model number MMT-722
- Z-2442-2015 · Jul 22, 2015 · TerminatedGuardian Real-Time Monitor, Model No. CSS7100. Indicated for continuous or periodic monitoring of glucose levels in the fluid under the skin, in adults (18 years and older) with d
- Z-2179-2014 · Jul 21, 2014 · TerminatedMedtronic MiniMed Guardian Monitor, Model No. CSS7100, CSS7100K Product Usage: The Medtronic MiniMed model CSS7100 and CSS7100K Guardian REAL-Time monitors are used in combinatio
- Z-2544-2014 · Mar 13, 2014 · TerminatedMedtronic MiniMed Paradigm Insulin Infusion Pumps, Paradigm models: MMT-511, MMT-512, MMT-712, MMT-712E, MMT-515, MMT-715, MMT-522, MMT-522K, MMT-722, MMT-722K, MMT-523, MMT-523K
Other Sensor, glucose, invasive devices
- Dexcom G4 Platinum Sensor 9500-27Dexcom, Inc. · Sensor, Glucose, Invasive2 recalls2 deaths99,426 reports
- Dexcom G5 Transmitter Kit STT-GF-001Dexcom, Inc. · Sensor, Glucose, Invasive1 death58,932 reports
- Dexcom G5 Mobile IOS App SW10611Dexcom, Inc. · Sensor, Glucose, Invasive54,544 reports
- Dexcom G5 Transmitter 9438-06Dexcom, Inc. · Sensor, Glucose, Invasive15,360 reports
- Dexcom G5 Mobile Receiver MT22719Dexcom, Inc. · Sensor, Glucose, Invasive1 death12,594 reports
- Dexcom G4 SBT Transmitter 9438-05Dexcom, Inc. · Sensor, Glucose, Invasive1 death9,041 reports
- Dexcom G5 Mobile Receiver MT22719-BLUDexcom, Inc. · Sensor, Glucose, Invasive7,685 reports
- Dexcom G5 Mobile Receiver Kit STK-GF-001Dexcom, Inc. · Sensor, Glucose, Invasive1 recall6,345 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page