Paradigm® REAL-Time Revel™ MMT-723NAP (UDI 00613994904348)Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 22 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00613994904348), received between Jun 26, 2017 and May 7, 2020 — classified as 5 injuries, 17 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Cycle” (6 reports).

14 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P980022); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 22 most recent of 22 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• MalfunctionMay 7, 2020Failure to Cycle; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Failure to Cycle; Detachment of Device or Device Component

  INFORMATION RECEIVED BY MEDTRONIC INDICATED THAT INSULIN PUMP HAD COMPROMISED FORCE SENSOR SYSTEM. NO HARM REQUIRING MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED. THE CUSTOMER WAS ASSISTED WITH TROUBLESHOOTING. THE CUSTOMER ALSO REPORTED THAT THE INSULIN WAS SQUIRTING DURING MANUAL PRIME PROCESS. CUSTOMER STATED THEY ARE UNABLE TO EXIT THE PREPARING TO PRIME LOOP. THE INSULIN WAS NOT DROPPED OR BUMPED. THE CUSTOMER STATED THAT THE DRIVE SUPPORT CAP WAS PROTRUDED. THE DEVICE WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.

  Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

  MAUDE report 10031751 ↗
• InjuryJan 29, 2020Failure to Cycle; Detachment of Device or Device Component; No Apparent Adverse Event; Failure to Cycle; Detachment of Device or Device Component; No Apparent Adverse Event

  THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THEY WERE EXPERIENCING HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE AND COMPROMISED FORCE SENSOR SYSTEM ALARM. BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT WAS 400 MG/DL. CUSTOMER STATED THAT THE DRIVE SUPPORT CAP WAS STICKING OUT. CUSTOMER STATED THAT THEY WERE NOT WEARING THE INSULIN PUMP DURING PRIMING. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE REPLACED, AND CUSTOMER AGREED TO RETURN THE PRODUCT FOR ANALYSIS.

  Patient problems: Hyperglycemia

  MAUDE report 9640993 ↗
• MalfunctionDec 10, 2019Mechanical Problem; Date/Time-Related Software Problem; Mechanical Problem; Date/Time-Related Software Problem

  THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE TIME ON CLOCK OF THE INSULIN PUMP WAS CHANGED UNEXPECTEDLY AND HAD TO REWIND MULTIPLE TIMES TO CHANGE INFUSION SITE. CUSTOMER'S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS UNKNOWN. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.

  Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

  MAUDE report 9443196 ↗
• MalfunctionJun 26, 2019Failure to Cycle; Priming Problem; Failure to Cycle; Priming Problem

  THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE INSULIN PUMP ALARMED COMPROMISED FORCE SENSOR SYSTEM AND INSULIN PUMP HAD PRIME REWIND ANOMALY. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS 146 MG/DL. THE TROUBLESHOOTING WAS PERFORMED FOR PRIME REWIND. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE DRIVE SUPPORT CAP WAS STICKING OUT. THE CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED THAT THE INSULIN PUMP NEEDED TO BE REPLACED AND WAS ADVISED TO DISCONTINUE USE OF THE INSULIN PUMP AND TO REVERT TO THE BACKUP PLAN. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.

  Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

  MAUDE report 8733659 ↗
• MalfunctionJun 3, 2019Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INSULIN PUMP HAD RECEIVED MOTOR ERROR ALARM. CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS 125 MG/DL. CUSTOMER STATED THAT THE ALARM WAS PREVIOUSLY CLEARED. CUSTOMER WAS ABLE TO COMPLETE INSULIN PUMP REWIND. CUSTOMER ALSO REPORTED THAT THE INSULIN PUMP RECEIVED ANOTHER MOTOR ERROR ALARM. TROUBLESHOOTING WAS PERFORMED. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.

  Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

  MAUDE report 8662198 ↗
• MalfunctionApr 4, 2019Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

  THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE INSULIN PUMP ALARMED MOTOR ERROR DURING THE REWIND PROCESS. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS 187 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT. THE CUSTOMER DID NOT PROVIDE INFORMATION ON EVENTS LEADING UP TO THE INCIDENT. TROUBLESHOOTING WAS PERFORMED AND DID NOT RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THE CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED TO DISCONTINUE USE OF THE INSULIN PUMP AND TO REVERT TO THE BACK-UP PLAN. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.

  Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

  MAUDE report 8483012 ↗
• MalfunctionApr 1, 2019Mechanical Problem; Device Difficult to Program or Calibrate; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Mechanical Problem; Device Difficult to Program or Calibrate; Patient Device Interaction Problem

  THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE INSULIN PUMP HAD KEYPAD ANOMALY AND MOTOR ERROR. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS UNKNOWN. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE MOTOR ERROR AND BUTTONS WERE LESS RESPONSIVE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THEY HAD SCRATCHES ON THE INSULIN PUMP. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.

  Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

  MAUDE report 8468418 ↗
• InjuryMar 30, 2019Mechanical Problem; Obstruction of Flow; No Apparent Adverse Event; Mechanical Problem; Obstruction of Flow; No Apparent Adverse Event

  THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THEY EXPERIENCED HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE AND INSULIN PUMP HAD MOTOR ERROR AND NO DELIVERY ALARM. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS 487 MG/DL. THE CUSTOMER¿S CURRENT BLOOD GLUCOSE VALUE WAS 160 MG/DL. CUSTOMER REPORTED THE DRIVE SUPPORT CAP APPEARS NORMAL. CUSTOMER DID NOT REPORT AN MOTOR POSITION ENCODER ERROR ALARM. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.

  Patient problems: Hyperglycemia

  MAUDE report 8467637 ↗
• MalfunctionFeb 6, 2019Premature Discharge of Battery; Premature Discharge of Battery

  THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE INSULIN PUMP HAD RECEIVED UNEXPECTED RESTART AND A COLD RESET WAS PERFORMED ALARM. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS UNKNOWN. CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THEY WERE ABLE TO CLEAR THE ALARM. CUSTOMER ALSO REPORTED THAT THE INSULIN PUMP DID REQUIRE REWIND. CUSTOMER WAS ABLE TO COMPLETE REWIND. CUSTOMER STATED THAT THE CALLING BACK AFTER COMPLETING INSULIN PUMP ERROR ALARM TROUBLESHOOTING AND RECEIVING ANOTHER UNEXPECTED RESTART AND A COLD RESET WAS PERFORMED INSULIN PUMP ERROR ALARM AFTER A BATTERY CHANGE. TROUBLESHOOTING WAS PERFORMED FOR INSULIN PUMP ERROR. CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED TO MONITOR THE INSULIN PUMP AND THAT PATIENT MAY CONTINUE TO WEAR THE INSULIN PUMP UNTIL REPLACEMENT ARRIVES. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.

  Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

  MAUDE report 8309346 ↗
• InjuryJan 24, 2019Failure to Cycle; No Apparent Adverse Event; Failure to Cycle; No Apparent Adverse Event

  THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THEY EXPERIENCED HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE AND INSULIN PUMP ALARMED COMPROMISED FORCE SENSOR SYSTEM. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS 528 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT. THE CUSTOMER DID NOT PROVIDE DETAILS REGARDING SYMPTOMS AND TREATMENT OF HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE. THE CUSTOMER ALSO REPORTED THAT THE INSULIN WAS SQUIRTING DURING MANUAL PRIME PROCESS. THE CUSTOMER STATED THAT THE DRIVE SUPPORT CAP WAS NORMAL. THE CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED THAT THE INSULIN PUMP NEEDED TO BE REPLACED AND WAS ADVISED TO DISCONTINUE USE OF THE INSULIN PUMP AND TO REVERT TO THE BACKUP PLAN. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.

  Patient problems: Hyperglycemia

  MAUDE report 8273397 ↗
• MalfunctionJan 6, 2019Failure to Cycle; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Failure to Cycle; Detachment of Device or Device Component

  THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE INSULIN PUMP ALARMED COMPROMISED FORCE SENSOR SYSTEM. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS 131 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT. THE CUSTOMER STATED THAT THE DRIVE SUPPORT CAP WAS PROTRUDED. THE CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED THAT THE INSULIN PUMP NEEDED TO BE REPLACED AND WAS ADVISED TO DISCONTINUE USE OF THE INSULIN PUMP AND TO REVERT TO THE BACKUP PLAN. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.

  Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

  MAUDE report 8220910 ↗
• MalfunctionNov 1, 2018Display or Visual Feedback Problem; Display or Visual Feedback Problem

  THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE INSULIN PUMP HAD KEYPAD ANOMALY, DISPLAY ANOMALY AND MOTOR ERROR. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS UNKNOWN. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE BUTTONS WERE NOT WORKING PROPERLY. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THEY RECEIVED A MOTOR ERROR ALARM. CUSTOMER WAS ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY CLEAR THE ALARM. CUSTOMER WAS ABLE TO COMPLETE PUMP REWIND. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE DRIVE SUPPORT CAP WAS NORMAL. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCREEN WAS SCRATCHED AND FORCED TO ANGLE PUMP TO SEE DISPLAY AND RESERVOIR COMPARTMENT OPENING WAS CHIPPED. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE TIME CLOCK WAS ADVANCING. THE CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED TO DISCONTINUE USE OF THE PUMP AND REVERT TO BACKUP PLAN PER HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL INSTRUCTIONS. THE CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED THE PUMP WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.

  Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

  MAUDE report 8030036 ↗
• MalfunctionAug 8, 2018Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

  CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE INSULIN PUMP ALARMED COMPROMISED FORCE SENSOR SYSTEM. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS UNKNOWN. CUSTOMER ADVISED THE DRIVE SUPPORT CAP WAS STICKING OUT. CUSTOMER ADVISED DURING THE SEATING OF THE FORCE THE SENSOR DID NOT DETECT THE RESERVOIR. THE CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED THAT THE INSULIN PUMP NEEDED TO BE REPLACED AND WAS ADVISED TO DISCONTINUE USE OF THE INSULIN PUMP AND TO REVERT TO THE BACKUP PLAN. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.

  Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

  MAUDE report 7760687 ↗
• MalfunctionJul 31, 2018Failure to Cycle; Failure to Cycle

  THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE INSULIN PUMP ALARMED COMPROMISED FORCED SENSOR SYSTEM. THE CUSTOMER'S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS 250 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT. THE CUSTOMER ALSO STATED THAT THE DRIVE SUPPORT CAP WAS STICKING OUT. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR THE ANALYSIS.

  Patient problems: Hyperglycemia

  MAUDE report 7734428 ↗
• MalfunctionJul 27, 2018Unexpected Shutdown; Unexpected Shutdown

  THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE INSULIN PUMP HAD MULTIPLE PUMP ERROR ALARM. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS 101 MG/DL. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THEY HAD PERFORMED THAT TROUBLESHOOTING FOR PUMP ERROR. ALARM OCCURRED SHORTLY AFTER INSERTING A NEW BATTERY. THE CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED THE INSULIN PUMP EXPERIENCED AN UNEXPECTED RESTART. THE CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED TO MONITOR THE PUMP. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.

  Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

  MAUDE report 7728018 ↗
• MalfunctionJun 26, 2018Device Displays Incorrect Message; Moisture or Humidity Problem

  THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THE INSULIN PUMP ALARMED BUTTON ERROR. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS 158 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT. THE CUSTOMER STATED THAT THE INSULIN PUMP WAS EXPOSED TO MOISTURE. THE CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED TO DISCONTINUE USE OF THE INSULIN PUMP AND TO REVERT TO THE BACK-UP PLAN. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.

  Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

  MAUDE report 7636704 ↗
• MalfunctionFeb 22, 2018Sticking

  CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL FOR COSMETIC DAMAGE. BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS UNKNOWN. CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT BATTERY CAP IS STUCK. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.

  Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

  MAUDE report 7289558 ↗
• MalfunctionDec 21, 2017Device Displays Incorrect Message; Material Protrusion/Extrusion

  THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE INSULIN PUMP ALARMED COMPROMISED FORCE SENSOR SYSTEM. THE PATIENT¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS UNKNOWN AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT. THE CUSTOMER STATED THAT THE DRIVE SUPPORT CAP WAS PROTRUDED. THE CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED THAT THE INSULIN PUMP NEEDED TO BE REPLACED AND WAS ADVISED TO DISCONTINUE USE OF THE INSULIN PUMP AND TO REVERT TO THE BACKUP PLAN. THE DEVICE IS NOT EXPECTED TO BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.

  Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

  MAUDE report 7140772 ↗
• InjuryNov 30, 2017Break; Inaccurate Delivery

  THE CUSTOMER¿S HUSBAND WAS REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE INSULIN PUMP WAS UNDER DELIVERING INSULIN AND THE BLOOD GLUCOSE IS HIGH AS 439 MG/DL. THE CURRENT BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS ALSO SAME. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS. CUSTOMER ALSO REPORTED THAT, THE SERTER WAS BROKEN AND NOT RELEASING SET WHEN SERTER IS LOADED AND BUTTONS ARE PRESSED. CUSTOMER TREATED WITH GETTING INSULIN THROUGH THE PUMP. BASED ON CUSTOMER REPORT CUSTOMER DOES NOT ALLEGE PUMP WAS UNDER DELIVERING. THE DRIVE SUPPORT CAP APPEARS NORMAL. CUSTOMER DECLINED TO CONTINUE TO TROUBLESHOOT FOR HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE BECAUSE HE HAD TO GO HE STATED HE WILL CALL US BACK TO CONTINUE. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.

  Patient problems: Hyperglycemia

  MAUDE report 7071261 ↗
• MalfunctionSep 12, 2017Device Displays Incorrect Message; Material Protrusion/Extrusion

  IT WAS REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE INSULIN PUMP ALARMED COMPROMISED FORCE SENSOR SYSTEM. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT WAS 250 MG/DL. THE DRIVE SUPPORT CAP WAS STICKING OUT. IT WAS ADVISED TO DISCONTINUE THE USE OF THE DEVICE AND TO REVERT TO THE BACK-UP PLAN. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL NOT BE RETURNING FOR ANALYSIS. CUSTOMER WILL NOT BE SENT A REPLACEMENT PUMP.

  Patient problems: Hyperglycemia

  MAUDE report 6858548 ↗
• InjuryJul 8, 2017Device Displays Incorrect Message; Device Operates Differently Than Expected

  THE CUSTOMER'S PARENT REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE INSULIN PUMP WAS NOT FUNCTIONING PROPERLY. THEY WERE CHANGING THE INFUSION SET WHEN THE INSULIN PUMP ALARMED A MOTOR ERROR AND ALL OF THE SETTINGS WERE ERASED. THE CUSTOMER'S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS 536 MG/DL. THE ALARM HISTORY WAS REVIEWED AND THEY FOUND MULTIPLE NO DELIVERY ALARMS, MULTIPLE MOTOR ERROR ALARMS, AND ONE MOTOR POSITION ENCODER ERROR ALARM. THE CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED TO DISCONTINUE USE OF THE DEVICE AND REVERT TO A BACK-UP PLAN. THE INSULIN PUMP WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.

  Patient problems: Hyperglycemia

  MAUDE report 6696123 ↗
• MalfunctionJun 26, 2017Device Displays Incorrect Message

  CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL TO HAVE RECEIVED A COMPROMISED FORCED SENSOR ALARM DURING PRIMING. CUSTOMER STATES THAT INSULIN PUMP WAS NOT DROPPED OR BUMPED. CUSTOMER STATES INSULIN ¿SQUIRT¿ OUT WHEN ATTEMPTED TO PRIME. CUSTOMER STATES DRIVE SUPPORT CAP APPEARED NORMAL. CUSTOMER'S BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS 145 MG/DL. AFTER TROUBLESHOOTING, CUSTOMER WAS NOT ABLE TO CLEAR ALARM. CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED THAT INSULIN PUMP WOULD NEED TO BE REPLACED.

  Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

  MAUDE report 6667551 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under P980022. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

• Z-1749-2026 · Feb 13, 2026 · Open, Classified
  Paradigm REAL-Time Insulin Pump (MMT-522, MMT-722)
• Z-1750-2026 · Feb 13, 2026 · Open, Classified
  Paradigm REAL-Time Revel Insulin Pump (MMT-523, MMT-723)
• Z-1256-2025 · Jan 31, 2025 · Open, Classified
  Paradigm insulin pump, REF: MMT-522, MMT-523, MMT-551, MMT-722, MMT-723, MMT-751
• Z-1593-2020 · Jun 27, 2019 · Open, Classified
  Medtronic MiniMed Paradigm Insulin pump, model number MMT-723K
• Z-1592-2020 · Jun 27, 2019 · Open, Classified
  Medtronic MiniMed Paradigm Insulin pump, model number MMT-523K
• Z-1587-2020 · Jun 27, 2019 · Open, Classified
  Medtronic MiniMed Paradigm Insulin pump, model number MMT-522
• Z-1591-2020 · Jun 27, 2019 · Open, Classified
  Medtronic MiniMed Paradigm Insulin pump, model number MMT-523
• Z-1594-2020 · Jun 27, 2019 · Open, Classified
  Medtronic MiniMed Paradigm Insulin pump, model number MMT-723
• Z-1589-2020 · Jun 27, 2019 · Open, Classified
  Medtronic MiniMed Paradigm Insulin pump, model number MMT-522K
• Z-1588-2020 · Jun 27, 2019 · Open, Classified
  Medtronic MiniMed Paradigm Insulin pump, model number MMT-722
• Z-1590-2020 · Jun 27, 2019 · Open, Classified
  Medtronic MiniMed Paradigm Insulin pump, model number MMT-722K
• Z-2442-2015 · Jul 22, 2015 · Terminated
  Guardian Real-Time Monitor, Model No. CSS7100. Indicated for continuous or periodic monitoring of glucose levels in the fluid under the skin, in adults (18 years and older) with d
• Z-2179-2014 · Jul 21, 2014 · Terminated
  Medtronic MiniMed Guardian Monitor, Model No. CSS7100, CSS7100K Product Usage: The Medtronic MiniMed model CSS7100 and CSS7100K Guardian REAL-Time monitors are used in combinatio
• Z-2544-2014 · Mar 13, 2014 · Terminated
  Medtronic MiniMed Paradigm Insulin Infusion Pumps, Paradigm models: MMT-511, MMT-512, MMT-712, MMT-712E, MMT-515, MMT-715, MMT-522, MMT-522K, MMT-722, MMT-722K, MMT-523, MMT-523K