ADVIA Centaur® CEA 10309978Recalls & reported problems
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. · CEA - CENTAUR - RGT - 500 tests · Class 2
All models of ADVIA Centaur CEA (2)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 10
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00630414177311), received between Sep 6, 2018 and Nov 28, 2023 — classified as 10 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “High Test Results” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- No Apparent Adverse Event9
- High Test Results1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient9
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionNov 28, 2023High Test Results; High Test Results
THE CUSTOMER OBTAINED DISCORDANT (ELEVATED) RESULTS FOR PATIENT SAMPLES WITH ADVIA CENTAUR XP CEA REAGENT LOT 217 ON THE SAME DAY. THE INITIAL RESULTS WERE NOT REPORTED TO PHYSICIAN(S). SAMPLES WERE RETESTED ON THE SAME INSTRUMENT WITH A NEW PACK OF THE SAME LOT. RETEST RESULTS WERE LOWER, CONSIDERED CORRECT AND WERE REPORTED TO THE PHYSICIAN(S). THERE ARE NO ALLEGATIONS OF PATIENT OR USER INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES DUE TO THE DISCORDANT CEA RESULTS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18217887 ↗MalfunctionMay 18, 2020No Apparent Adverse Event; No Apparent Adverse Event
FALSELY LOW ADVIA CENTAUR XP CEA RESULTS WERE OBTAINED FOR A PATIENT SAMPLE WITH REAGENT LOT 189. THE PATIENT SAMPLE WAS TESTED ON TWO ALTERNATE METHODS AND THE RESULTS WERE HIGHER. A SECOND SAMPLE WAS TESTED ON THE ADVIA CENTAUR XP AND THE CEA RESULTS WERE LOW WITH REAGENT LOT 189. THE SECOND SAMPLE WAS ALSO TESTED ON THE TWO ALTERNATE METHODS AND THE RESULTS WERE HIGHER. THE SECOND PATIENT SAMPLE WAS REPEATED ON REAGENT LOT 193 ON THE ADVIA CENTAUR XP. THE RESULT OBTAINED WAS SIMILAR TO THE RESULT FROM LOT 189. THE DISCORDANT RESULTS WERE REPORTED AND QUESTIONED BY THE PHYSICIAN. A CORRECTED REPORT WAS ISSUED. PATIENT TREATMENT WAS NOT ALTERED OR PRESCRIBED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF ADVERSE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES DUE TO THE DISCORDANT ADVIA CENTAUR XP CEA RESULTS.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10067922 ↗MalfunctionMay 18, 2020No Apparent Adverse Event; No Apparent Adverse Event
FALSELY LOW ADVIA CENTAUR XP CEA RESULTS WERE OBTAINED FOR A PATIENT SAMPLE WITH REAGENT LOT 189. THE PATIENT SAMPLE WAS TESTED ON TWO ALTERNATE METHODS AND THE RESULTS WERE HIGHER. A SECOND SAMPLE WAS TESTED ON THE ADVIA CENTAUR XP AND THE CEA RESULTS WERE LOW WITH REAGENT LOT 189. THE SECOND SAMPLE WAS ALSO TESTED ON THE TWO ALTERNATE METHODS AND THE RESULTS WERE HIGHER. THE SECOND PATIENT SAMPLE WAS REPEATED ON REAGENT LOT 193 ON THE ADVIA CENTAUR XP. THE RESULT OBTAINED WAS SIMILAR TO THE RESULT FROM LOT 189. THE DISCORDANT RESULTS WERE REPORTED AND QUESTIONED BY THE PHYSICIAN. A CORRECTED REPORT WAS ISSUED. PATIENT TREATMENT WAS NOT ALTERED OR PRESCRIBED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF ADVERSE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES DUE TO THE DISCORDANT ADVIA CENTAUR XP CEA RESULTS.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10067921 ↗MalfunctionMay 18, 2020No Apparent Adverse Event; No Apparent Adverse Event
FALSELY LOW ADVIA CENTAUR XP CEA RESULTS WERE OBTAINED FOR A PATIENT SAMPLE WITH REAGENT LOT 189. THE PATIENT SAMPLE WAS TESTED ON TWO ALTERNATE METHODS AND THE RESULTS WERE HIGHER. A SECOND SAMPLE WAS TESTED ON THE ADVIA CENTAUR XP AND THE CEA RESULTS WERE LOW WITH REAGENT LOT 189. THE SECOND SAMPLE WAS ALSO TESTED ON THE TWO ALTERNATE METHODS AND THE RESULTS WERE HIGHER. THE SECOND PATIENT SAMPLE WAS REPEATED ON REAGENT LOT 193 ON THE ADVIA CENTAUR XP. THE RESULT OBTAINED WAS SIMILAR TO THE RESULT FROM LOT 189. THE DISCORDANT RESULTS WERE REPORTED AND QUESTIONED BY THE PHYSICIAN. A CORRECTED REPORT WAS ISSUED. PATIENT TREATMENT WAS NOT ALTERED OR PRESCRIBED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF ADVERSE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES DUE TO THE DISCORDANT ADVIA CENTAUR XP CEA RESULTS.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10067918 ↗MalfunctionMay 18, 2020No Apparent Adverse Event; No Apparent Adverse Event
FALSELY LOW ADVIA CENTAUR XP CEA RESULTS WERE OBTAINED FOR A PATIENT SAMPLE WITH REAGENT LOT 189. THE PATIENT SAMPLE WAS TESTED ON TWO ALTERNATE METHODS AND THE RESULTS WERE HIGHER. A SECOND SAMPLE WAS TESTED ON THE ADVIA CENTAUR XP AND THE CEA RESULTS WERE LOW WITH REAGENT LOT 189. THE SECOND SAMPLE WAS ALSO TESTED ON THE TWO ALTERNATE METHODS AND THE RESULTS WERE HIGHER. THE SECOND PATIENT SAMPLE WAS REPEATED ON REAGENT LOT 193 ON THE ADVIA CENTAUR XP. THE RESULT OBTAINED WAS SIMILAR TO THE RESULT FROM LOT 189. THE DISCORDANT RESULTS WERE REPORTED AND QUESTIONED BY THE PHYSICIAN. A CORRECTED REPORT WAS ISSUED. PATIENT TREATMENT WAS NOT ALTERED OR PRESCRIBED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF ADVERSE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES DUE TO THE DISCORDANT ADVIA CENTAUR XP CEA RESULTS.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10067916 ↗MalfunctionSep 6, 2018No Apparent Adverse Event; No Apparent Adverse Event
DISCORDANT NEGATIVE ADVIA CENTAUR XP CEA RESULTS WERE OBTAINED ON A PATIENT SAMPLE DURING PHYSICAL EXAMINATION. THE PATIENT SAMPLE WAS TESTED ON TWO ALTERNATE METHODS AND THE RESULTS WERE POSITIVE. THERE IS NO INDICATION OF A CANCER DIAGNOSIS WITH THIS PATIENT AND THE INITIAL NEGATIVE RESULT WAS REPORTED TO THE PHYSICIAN. THE PATIENT WAS TESTED ON THE ALTERNATE METHODS BECAUSE TWO WEEKS AGO THE PATIENT WAS TESTED IN ANOTHER HOSPITAL ON THE TWO ALTERNATE METHODS AND THE RESULTS WERE POSITIVE FOR CEA. BEFORE MEASURING CEA ON THE ADVIA CENTAUR XP, THIS PATIENT TOLD THE PHYSICIAN THE PREVIOUS CEA RESULTS WERE POSITIVE. PATIENT TREATMENT WAS NOT ALTERED OR PRESCRIBED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF ADVERSE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES DUE TO THE DISCORDANT ADVIA CENTAUR XP CEA RESULTS.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7852163 ↗MalfunctionSep 6, 2018No Apparent Adverse Event; No Apparent Adverse Event
DISCORDANT NEGATIVE ADVIA CENTAUR XP CEA RESULTS WERE OBTAINED ON A PATIENT SAMPLE DURING PHYSICAL EXAMINATION. THE PATIENT SAMPLE WAS TESTED ON TWO ALTERNATE METHODS AND THE RESULTS WERE POSITIVE. THERE IS NO INDICATION OF A CANCER DIAGNOSIS WITH THIS PATIENT AND THE INITIAL NEGATIVE RESULT WAS REPORTED TO THE PHYSICIAN. THE PATIENT WAS TESTED ON THE ALTERNATE METHODS BECAUSE TWO WEEKS AGO THE PATIENT WAS TESTED IN ANOTHER HOSPITAL ON THE TWO ALTERNATE METHODS AND THE RESULTS WERE POSITIVE FOR CEA. BEFORE MEASURING CEA ON THE ADVIA CENTAUR XP, THIS PATIENT TOLD THE PHYSICIAN THE PREVIOUS CEA RESULTS WERE POSITIVE. PATIENT TREATMENT WAS NOT ALTERED OR PRESCRIBED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF ADVERSE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES DUE TO THE DISCORDANT ADVIA CENTAUR XP CEA RESULTS.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7852123 ↗MalfunctionSep 6, 2018No Apparent Adverse Event; No Apparent Adverse Event
DISCORDANT NEGATIVE ADVIA CENTAUR XP CEA RESULTS WERE OBTAINED ON A PATIENT SAMPLE. THE PATIENT SAMPLE WAS TESTED ON TWO ALTERNATE METHODS AND THE RESULTS WERE POSITIVE. THE POSITIVE RESULT WAS REPORTED TO THE PHYSICIAN. PATIENT TREATMENT WAS NOT ALTERED OR PRESCRIBED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF ADVERSE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES DUE TO THE DISCORDANT ADVIA CENTAUR XP CEA RESULTS.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7851417 ↗MalfunctionSep 6, 2018No Apparent Adverse Event; No Apparent Adverse Event
DISCORDANT NEGATIVE ADVIA CENTAUR XP CEA RESULTS WERE OBTAINED ON A PATIENT SAMPLE. THE PATIENT SAMPLE WAS TESTED ON TWO ALTERNATE METHODS AND THE RESULTS WERE POSITIVE. THE POSITIVE RESULT WAS REPORTED TO THE PHYSICIAN. PATIENT TREATMENT WAS NOT ALTERED OR PRESCRIBED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF ADVERSE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES DUE TO THE DISCORDANT ADVIA CENTAUR XP CEA RESULTS.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7851416 ↗MalfunctionSep 6, 2018No Apparent Adverse Event; No Apparent Adverse Event
DISCORDANT NEGATIVE ADVIA CENTAUR XP CEA RESULTS WERE OBTAINED ON A PATIENT SAMPLE. THE PATIENT SAMPLE WAS TESTED ON TWO ALTERNATE METHODS AND THE RESULTS WERE POSITIVE. THE POSITIVE RESULT WAS REPORTED TO THE PHYSICIAN. PATIENT TREATMENT WAS NOT ALTERED OR PRESCRIBED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF ADVERSE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES DUE TO THE DISCORDANT ADVIA CENTAUR XP CEA RESULTS.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7851409 ↗
Other SYSTEM, TEST, CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN devices
- ADVIA Centaur® CEA 10309977Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. · SYSTEM, TEST, CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN14 reports
- ARCHITECT 07K68-27Abbott Ireland Diagnostics · SYSTEM, TEST, CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN13 reports
- Elecsys CEA 07027079190Roche Diagnostics GmbH · SYSTEM, TEST, CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN13 reports
- Atellica IM CEA 10995523Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. · SYSTEM, TEST, CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN11 reports
- IMMULITE® 2000 Systems CEA 10380995Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products Ltd · SYSTEM, TEST, CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN9 reports
- Elecsys Anti-CCP 07251670190Roche Diagnostics GmbH · SYSTEM, TEST, CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN8 reports
- ARCHITECT 07K68-35Abbott Ireland Diagnostics · SYSTEM, TEST, CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN8 reports
- Alinity 07P6220Abbott Ireland Diagnostics · SYSTEM, TEST, CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN5 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page