Skip to content

N/A X0411333Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · DRILL BIT X0411333 ADJUSTABLE CANCELLOUS · Class 1

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00643169000896), received between May 3, 2023 and May 3, 2023 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Use of Device Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • Nerve Damage1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 3, 2023Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    CITATION: SHARON KA PO. TAM, PAOLO A. BOLOGNESE, ROGER W. KULA, ANDREW BRODBELT, MANSOOR FOROUGHI, MARAT AVSHALUMOV, DENMARK MUGUTSO AND ILENE RUHOY. SAFETY ANALYSIS AND COMPLICATIONS OF CONDYLAR SCREWS IN A SINGLE-SURGEON SERIES OF 250 OCCIPITOCERVICAL FUSIONS. A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA (2022). 164:903¿911. DOI.ORG/10.1007/S00701-021-05039-Z.. EVENT SUMMARY: A RETROSPECTIVE SAFETY AND COMPLICATION-BASED ANALYSIS OF OCCIPITOCERVICAL FUSION VIA CONDYLAR SCREWS FIXATION WAS PERFORMED. THIS STUDY AIMS TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY PROFILE AND COMPLICATIONS OF CONDYLAR SCREW FIXATION FOR OCCIPITOCERVICAL FUSION. A TOTAL OF 250 PATIENTS UNDERWENT OCCIPITOCERVICAL FUSIONS USING 500 CONDYLAR SCREWS BETWEEN (B)(6) 2012 AND (B)(6) 2018. TWO HUNDRED SEVENTEEN PATIENTS WERE FEMALES. THE MEAN AGE WAS 36 ± 13.4 SD, RANGING FROM 6 TO 75. 23 PATIENTS WERE BELOW 18 YEARS OF AGE (RANGING 6 TO 17). FORTY-FOUR CASES WERE REVISION SURGERIES FROM A FORMER BARPLATE CONFIGURATION. INDICATIONS FOR REVISION OPERATIONS INCLUDED PAINFUL PROFILE, METAL FATIGUE, OR BAR-PLATE BREAKDOWN, ALONE OR IN COMBINATION. ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY PATIENTS (72%) HAD A FORMAL DIAGNOSIS OR CLINICAL EVIDENCE. OF A CONNEC

    Patient problems: Nerve Damage

    MAUDE report 16858483 ↗

Other BIT, DRILL devices

All BIT, DRILL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page