N/A X0411333Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · DRILL BIT X0411333 ADJUSTABLE CANCELLOUS · Class 1
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00643169000896), received between May 3, 2023 and May 3, 2023 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Use of Device Problem” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Use of Device Problem1
Patient problems
- Nerve Damage1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 3, 2023Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
CITATION: SHARON KA PO. TAM, PAOLO A. BOLOGNESE, ROGER W. KULA, ANDREW BRODBELT, MANSOOR FOROUGHI, MARAT AVSHALUMOV, DENMARK MUGUTSO AND ILENE RUHOY. SAFETY ANALYSIS AND COMPLICATIONS OF CONDYLAR SCREWS IN A SINGLE-SURGEON SERIES OF 250 OCCIPITOCERVICAL FUSIONS. A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA (2022). 164:903¿911. DOI.ORG/10.1007/S00701-021-05039-Z.. EVENT SUMMARY: A RETROSPECTIVE SAFETY AND COMPLICATION-BASED ANALYSIS OF OCCIPITOCERVICAL FUSION VIA CONDYLAR SCREWS FIXATION WAS PERFORMED. THIS STUDY AIMS TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY PROFILE AND COMPLICATIONS OF CONDYLAR SCREW FIXATION FOR OCCIPITOCERVICAL FUSION. A TOTAL OF 250 PATIENTS UNDERWENT OCCIPITOCERVICAL FUSIONS USING 500 CONDYLAR SCREWS BETWEEN (B)(6) 2012 AND (B)(6) 2018. TWO HUNDRED SEVENTEEN PATIENTS WERE FEMALES. THE MEAN AGE WAS 36 ± 13.4 SD, RANGING FROM 6 TO 75. 23 PATIENTS WERE BELOW 18 YEARS OF AGE (RANGING 6 TO 17). FORTY-FOUR CASES WERE REVISION SURGERIES FROM A FORMER BARPLATE CONFIGURATION. INDICATIONS FOR REVISION OPERATIONS INCLUDED PAINFUL PROFILE, METAL FATIGUE, OR BAR-PLATE BREAKDOWN, ALONE OR IN COMBINATION. ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY PATIENTS (72%) HAD A FORMAL DIAGNOSIS OR CLINICAL EVIDENCE. OF A CONNEC
Patient problems: Nerve Damage
MAUDE report 16858483 ↗
Other BIT, DRILL devices
- QUICKSET 2274-25-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · BIT, DRILL1,985 reports
- QUICKSET 2274-35-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · BIT, DRILL770 reports
- QUICKSET 2274-30-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · BIT, DRILL761 reports
- NA 03.037.022Synthes GmbH · BIT, DRILL339 reports
- NA 323.062Synthes GmbH · BIT, DRILL309 reports
- QUICKSET 2274-56-000Depuy (Ireland) · BIT, DRILL275 reports
- QUICKSET 2274-45-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · BIT, DRILL211 reports
- LCS 2366-83-000Depuy (Ireland) · BIT, DRILL207 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page