Guardian ™ Sensor (3) MMT-7020B (UDI 00643169704060)Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic Minimed, Inc. · SENSOR MMT-7020B ENLITE3 2L US · Class 3
All models of Guardian Sensor (3) (11)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Guardian Sensor (3) glucose sensor works with a Medtronic insulin pump. The 26 reports mostly describe readings that didn't match actual blood sugar, sometimes triggering low-sugar alarms or pump suspensions, plus a bent part and a broken needle. There are no deaths and 9 injuries, and no recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 26
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 9
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 26 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169704060), received between Aug 9, 2017 and Sep 19, 2018 — classified as 9 injuries, 17 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings” (8 reports).
14 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P160017); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings8
- Device Displays Incorrect Message7
- Device Operates Differently Than Expected3
- Bent2
- Calibration Problem2
- Communication or Transmission Problem2
- Incorrect Or Inadequate Test Results2
- Insufficient Device Problem Information2
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient11
- Hyperglycemia8
- Hypoglycemia8
- Blood Loss1
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 26 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 19, 2018Fracture; Fracture
CUSTOMER WAS REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT NEEDLE BROKE. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS UNKNOWN. THE SENSOR WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7891780 ↗MalfunctionAug 27, 2018Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings
CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THE SENSOR HAD INACCURATE READINGS THAT TRIGGERED THE THRESHOLD SUSPEND ALARM. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS 85 MG/DL AND THE SENSOR GLUCOSE WAS 40 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT. CUSTOMER WAS INFORMED THAT THEIR BLOOD GLUCOSE AND SENSOR GLUCOSE LEVELS WERE NOT IN ACCEPTABLE RANGE. THE SENSOR WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Hypoglycemia
MAUDE report 7817037 ↗MalfunctionAug 27, 2018Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THEY EXPERIENCED INACCURATE READINGS AND TRIGGERED THRESHOLD SUSPEND. THE CUSTOMER'S BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS 169 MG/DL AND SENSOR GLUCOSE WAS 47 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF INCIDENT WHEN IT TRIGGERED THRESHOLD SUSPEND. THE SENSOR WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7816040 ↗MalfunctionAug 13, 2018Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT HER SENSOR WAS INDICATING SHE WAS 47 MG/DL, BUT HER BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS 134 MG/DL. CUSTOMER STATED THE INSULIN PUMP SUSPENDED ON LOW BECAUSE OF THE LOW SENSOR GLUCOSE READING. THE CALIBRATION WAS NOT ACCEPTED. THE SENSORS WILL NOT BE RETURNED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7778193 ↗MalfunctionAug 6, 2018Calibration Problem; Calibration Problem
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THEY EXPERIENCED INACCURATE READINGS AND TRIGGERED THRESHOLD SUSPEND. THE CUSTOMER'S BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS 77 MG/DL AND SENSOR GLUCOSE WAS 47 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF INCIDENT WHEN IT TRIGGERED THRESHOLD SUSPEND. THE CUSTOMER STATED THAT THEY DID NOT HAVE A BENT CANNULA ON THE SENSOR. THE SENSOR WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7755373 ↗InjuryJun 28, 2018False Reading From Device Non-Compliance
CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THEY EXPERIENCED LOW BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL OF OVER 45 MG/DL. THE CUSTOMER TREATED THROUGH GLUCOSE CARB INTAKE. THE CUSTOMER ALSO REPORTED GETTING INACCURATE READINGS WITH THE SENSOR. CUSTOMER'S CURRENT BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL IS 137 MG/DL. CUSTOMER DECLINED TROUBLESHOOTING FOR LOW BLOOD GLUCOSE. THE SENSOR WAS NOT RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Hypoglycemia; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7649054 ↗InjuryJun 21, 2018Device Displays Incorrect Message; Calibration Problem
CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THEY EXPERIENCED HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL OF 400MG/DL. CUSTOMER EXPERIENCED DIFFERENT BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS 254, 389, MG/DL .CUSTOMER DID NOT WANT TROUBLESHOOTING FOR HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL. CUSTOMER RECEIVED A CHANGE SENSOR ALERT AFTER A CALIBRATION NOT ACCEPTED. THE PRODUCT WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Hyperglycemia
MAUDE report 7627468 ↗InjuryJun 19, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THEY HAD A LOW BLOOD GLUCOSE VALUE OF 48, 63 AND 40 MG/DL. CUSTOMER DECLINED TO TROUBLESHOOT FOR THEIR BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVELS. SENSOR UPDATING AND CHANGE SENSOR WERE ALSO REPORTED. THE CUSTOMER WAS TREATED WITH CARBOHYDRATE. THE INSULIN PUMP IS NOT EXPECTED TO BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Hypoglycemia
MAUDE report 7612705 ↗InjuryJun 13, 2018Bent; Device Displays Incorrect Message; Device Operates Differently Than Expected
IT WAS REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THEY EXPERIENCED HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE OF OVER 400 MG/DL AND ALSO EXPERIENCED LOW BLOOD GLUCOSE. CUSTOMER TREATED HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE WITH 2 BOLUSES. BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS 92 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF THE CALL. CUSTOMER ALSO REPORTED SENSOR ISSUES SUCH AS: CHANGE SENSOR ALARM AND A BENT CANNULA. THE SENSOR WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia
MAUDE report 7597443 ↗MalfunctionJun 12, 2018Device Operates Differently Than Expected
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THE SENSOR HAD INACCURATE READINGS THAT TRIGGERED THRESHOLD SUSPEND ALARM. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS 179 MG/DL AND THE SENSOR GLUCOSE WAS 48 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT. THE CUSTOMER WAS INFORMED THAT THEIR BLOOD GLUCOSE AND SENSOR GLUCOSE LEVELS WERE NOT IN ACCEPTABLE RANGE. CUSTOMER COMPLETED TROUBLESHOOTING BUT DECLINED TO REVIEW SENSOR BEST PRACTICES (SITE SELECTION, TAPING, CALIBRATION PROTOCOL). THE SENSOR WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Hyperglycemia
MAUDE report 7594330 ↗MalfunctionJun 11, 2018Incorrect Or Inadequate Test Results
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THE SENSOR HAD INACCURATE READINGS THAT TRIGGERED THRESHOLD SUSPEND ALARM. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS 340 MG/DL, 190 MG/DL, 224 MG/DL SENSOR VALUE THAT TRIGGERED THE SUSPEND EVENT WAS 110 MG/DL. INSULIN DELIVERY WAS SUSPENDED DUE TO SENSOR VALUES. THE CUSTOMER WAS INFORMED THAT THEIR BLOOD GLUCOSE AND SENSOR GLUCOSE LEVELS WERE NOT IN ACCEPTABLE RANGE. THE SENSOR WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7588752 ↗InjuryJun 8, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information
CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THEY EXPERIENCED HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL. CUSTOMER'S BLOOD GLUCOSE VALUE WAS 500 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF INCIDENT. THE CUSTOMER WAS ASSISTED WITH TROUBLESHOOTING AND DECLINED FOR HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE. CUSTOMER WILL NOT BE RETURNED DEVICE FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Hyperglycemia
MAUDE report 7581378 ↗InjuryJun 4, 2018Low Test Results
THE CUSTOMER WAS REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT, THE CUSTOMER WAS HOSPITALIZED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE WITH LOW BLOOD GLUCOSE OF 11 MG/DL AND CURRENT BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS 223 MG/DL. CUSTOMER STATED THAT, THIS OCCURRED SATURDAY NIGHT, HE MUST OF FELL, THEN CUSTOMER ENDED UP IN HOSPITAL AND THEN WAS SENT TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM. CUSTOMER WAS WEARING THE PUMP AT TIME OF HOSPITALIZATION. CUSTOMER WAS UNABLE TO COMPLETE CARE-LINK UPLOAD. BASED ON CUSTOMER REPORT CUSTOMER DOES NOT ALLEGE PUMP WAS OVER DELIVERING. THE SENSOR AND INSULIN PUMP WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Hypoglycemia
MAUDE report 7564568 ↗InjuryJun 2, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THEY EXPERIENCED LOW BLOOD GLUCOSE. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS 44 MG/DL. THE CUSTOMER DECLINED TROUBLESHOOT FOR LOW BLOOD GLUCOSE. THE SENSOR WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Hypoglycemia
MAUDE report 7563883 ↗InjuryMay 15, 2018Communication or Transmission Problem
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THEY WERE EXPERIENCING LOW BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL AND SENSOR ISSUES. BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT WAS 51 MG/DL WHICH WAS TREATED WITH FOOD. CUSTOMER ALSO STATED THAT THEY NEED TO ESTABLISH COMMUNICATION WITH THE SENSOR AND TRANSMITTER. NO PRODUCT WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Hypoglycemia
MAUDE report 7517163 ↗MalfunctionMay 15, 2018Device Displays Incorrect Message
CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THEY EXPERIENCED LOW BLOOD GLUCOSE. THE BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS 35 MG/DL AND THEN IT WAS BETWEEN 44 MG/DL AND 52 MG/DL. CUSTOMER STATED THAT THEY HAD BLOOD GLUCOSE RANGING FROM 110 MG/DL TO 115 MG/DL. AFTER FEW DAYS THE BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS 134 MG/DL, 148 MG/DL AND 187 MG/DL. CUSTOMER TREATED WITH JUICE AND SOMETIMES SUGAR FOR LOW BLOOD GLUCOSE. CUSTOMER ALSO REPORTED GETTING ALERT FOR CANNOT FIND SENSOR SIGNAL AND SENSOR UPDATING. TROUBLESHOOTING WAS DECLINED FOR LOW BLOOD GLUCOSE. NO PRODUCT WILL RETURN FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Hypoglycemia
MAUDE report 7517073 ↗MalfunctionApr 30, 2018Device Displays Incorrect Message; Communication or Transmission Problem
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THEY EXPERIENCED HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE OF 429 MG/DL WHICH WAS TREATED WITH MANUAL INJECTION. BLOOD GLUCOSE AT THE TIME OF THE CALL WAS 398 MG/DL. THE CUSTOMER STATED THAT THE INSULIN PUMP ALARMED INSULIN FLOW BLOCKED. TROUBLESHOOTING WAS PERFORMED. THE CUSTOMER CONFIRMED INSULIN EXITED THE TUBING AFTER DISCONNECTING AT THE QUICK RELEASE. THE CANULA WAS REMOVED AND WAS NOT BENT. IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT THE ALARM MAY BE DUE TO A POSSIBLE SITE RELATED ISSUE AND ADVISED TO CHANGE THE ENTIRE INFUSION SET SYSTEM. THE CUSTOMER ALSO REPORTED THAT THERE WAS NO COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE TRANSMITTER AND SENSOR. TROUBLESHOOTING WAS PERFORMED. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS. THE SENSOR WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Hyperglycemia
MAUDE report 7474088 ↗MalfunctionMar 30, 2018Component Missing
CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL FOR SENSOR CANNULA MISSING. BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS UNKNOWN. CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT TRANSMITTER DID NOT BLINK WHEN IT WAS CONNECTED TO SENSOR. CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT WHILE REMOVED SENSOR SHE STATED THAT THE CANNULA WAS NOT ON THE SENSOR. CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT SENSOR CANNULA MIGHT HAVE STAYED IN BODY. THE SENSOR WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7385745 ↗MalfunctionMar 9, 2018Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Device Operates Differently Than Expected
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THE SENSOR HAD INACCURATE READINGS THAT TRIGGERED THRESHOLD SUSPEND ALARM. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS 92 MG/DL AND THE SENSOR GLUCOSE WAS 61 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT. THE CUSTOMER'S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS 95 MG/DL. THE CUSTOMER WAS INFORMED THAT THEIR BLOOD GLUCOSE AND SENSOR GLUCOSE LEVELS WERE NOT IN ACCEPTABLE RANGE. THE SENSOR WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7327602 ↗MalfunctionFeb 28, 2018Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Device Displays Incorrect Message
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THE SENSOR HAD INACCURATE READINGS THAT TRIGGERED THRESHOLD SUSPEND ALARM. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS 115 MG/DL, 100 MG/DL AND THE SENSOR GLUCOSE WAS 40 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS 200 MG/DL AND 260 MG/DL. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THEY HAD HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE. THE SENSOR GLUCOSE VALUE THAT TRIGGERED THE SUSPEND EVENT WAS 40 MG/DL AND SUSPEND ON LOW LIMIT IN SENSOR SETTINGS WAS 70 MG/DL. THE SENSOR WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Hyperglycemia
MAUDE report 7305146 ↗InjuryFeb 15, 2018Bent
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THEY HAD EXPERIENCED HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE. THE CUSTOMER'S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS RISING TO 460 MG/DL. THE CUSTOMER TREATED WITH THE INSULIN PUMP. IT WAS ALSO STATED THAT THE CANNULA WAS BENT. THE CUSTOMER DECLINED TROUBLESHOOT. IT WAS ALSO STATED THAT THE CANNULA WAS BENT. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR THE ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Hyperglycemia
MAUDE report 7273299 ↗MalfunctionJan 24, 2018Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Failure to Deliver
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THE SENSOR HAD INACCURATE READINGS THAT TRIGGERED THRESHOLD SUSPEND ALARM. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS 95 MG/DL AND THE SENSOR GLUCOSE WAS 40 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT. CUSTOMER¿S CURRENT BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS 205 MG/DL AND CURRENT SENSOR GLUCOSE VALUE WAS 162 MG/DL. CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT SENSOR GLUCOSE AND BLOOD GLUCOSE DIFFERENCE IS NOT WITHIN ACCEPTABLE RANGE. THE CUSTOMER WAS INFORMED THAT THEIR BLOOD GLUCOSE AND SENSOR GLUCOSE LEVELS WERE NOT IN ACCEPTABLE RANGE. CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT INSULIN DELIVERY WAS SUSPENDED DUE TO SENSOR GLUCOSE VALUES. SENSOR GLUCOSE VALUE THAT TRIGGERED THE SUSPEND EVENT: 70 MG/DL. THRESHOLD/LOW SUSPEND LIMIT IN SENSOR SETTINGS: 70 MG/DL. THE SENSOR WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7215894 ↗MalfunctionJan 2, 2018Incorrect Or Inadequate Test Results; Device Displays Incorrect Message
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THE SENSOR HAD INACCURATE READINGS THAT TRIGGERED THRESHOLD SUSPEND ALARM. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS 263 MG/DL AND THE SENSOR GLUCOSE WAS 193 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT. CURRENT BLOOD GLUCOSE VALUE IS 231MG/DL. SENSOR GLUCOSE VALUE THAT TRIGGERED THE SUSPEND EVENT WAS 60MG/DL. SUSPEND ON LOW LIMIT IN SENSOR SETTINGS WAS 70MG/DL. THE CUSTOMER WAS INFORMED THAT THEIR BLOOD GLUCOSE AND SENSOR GLUCOSE LEVELS WERE NOT IN ACCEPTABLE RANGE. THE SENSOR WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Hyperglycemia
MAUDE report 7157450 ↗MalfunctionDec 29, 2017Break
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE SENSOR CANNULA WAS BROKEN. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS UNKNOWN AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT. THE CUSTOMER STATES THE SENSOR CANNULA WAS BROKEN OFF IN TWO PIECES. THE SENSOR WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Blood Loss
MAUDE report 7155121 ↗MalfunctionDec 8, 2017Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Device Displays Incorrect Message
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE INSULIN PUMP HAD A STUCK BUTTON ALARM DUE TO BUTTONS PRESSED FOR MORE THAN 3 MINUTES. CUSTOMER WAS ABLE TO CLEAR THE ALARM AND THE BUTTONS ARE WORKING/RESPONDING CURRENTLY. CUSTOMER ALSO REPORTED THEIR SENSOR HAD INACCURATE READINGS THAT TRIGGERED THRESHOLD SUSPEND ALARM. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS 130 MG/DL AND THE SENSOR GLUCOSE WAS 60-70 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT. BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS 174 MG/DL WHEN SENSOR ALERTED FOR LOW OF 68 MG/DL. THE CUSTOMER WAS INFORMED THAT THEIR BLOOD GLUCOSE AND SENSOR GLUCOSE LEVELS WERE NOT IN ACCEPTABLE RANGE. THE SENSOR WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS. THE SENSOR WILL BE REPLACED AND CUSTOMER AGREED TO RETURN THE SENSOR FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7101956 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under P160017. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2981-2026 · Jul 13, 2026 · Open, ClassifiedMiniMed 670G Insulin Pump, Model: MMT-1781, MMT-1782;
- Z-1739-2026 · Feb 13, 2026 · Open, ClassifiedMiniMed 670G Insulin Pump (MMT-1760, MMT-1761, MMT-1762, MMT-1780, MMT-1781, MMT-1782)
- Z-1742-2026 · Feb 13, 2026 · Open, ClassifiedMiniMed 770G Insulin Pump (MMT-1880, MMT-1881, MMT-1882, MMT-1890, MMT-1891, MMT-1892)
- Z-1261-2025 · Jan 31, 2025 · Open, ClassifiedMiniMed insulin pump, REF: 670G (MMT-1760, MMT-1761, MMT-1762, MMT-1780, MMT-1781, MMT-1782)
- Z-1265-2025 · Jan 31, 2025 · Open, ClassifiedMiniMed insulin pump, REF: 770G (MMT-1880, MMT-1881, MMT-1882, MMT-1890, MMT-1891, MMT-1892)
- Z-1266-2025 · Jan 31, 2025 · Open, ClassifiedMiniMed insulin pump, REF: 780G (MMT-1884, MMT-1885, MMT-1886, MMT-1894, MMT-1895, MMT-1896)
- Z-0003-2025 · Jul 31, 2024 · Open, ClassifiedMiniMed Insulin Pump Device. MiniMed 670G, REF: MMT-1580, MMT-1581, MMT-1582, MMT-1780, MMT-1781, MMT-1782, MMT-1740, MMT-1741, MMT-1742, MMT-1760, MMT-1761, MMT-1762; MiniMed 770G
- Z-0193-2023 · Sep 20, 2022 · Open, ClassifiedInsulin Pump/Model: MiniMed 630G/ MMT-1715, MMT-1755, MMT-1754; MiniMed 670G/ MMT-1780, MMT-1781, MMT-1782, MMT-1760, MMT-1761, MMT-1762, MMT-1740, MMT-1741, MMT-1742
- Z-0855-2022 · Jan 27, 2022 · Open, ClassifiedMiniMed 630G: MMT-1715, MMT-1754, MMT-1755; MiniMed 670G: MMT-1740, MMT-1741, MMT-1742, MMT-1760, MMT-1761, MMT-1762, MMT-1780, MMT-1781, MMT-1782; MiniMed 770G: MMT-1880, MMT-18
- Z-1771-2021 · Mar 15, 2021 · Open, ClassifiedMiniMed 780G Insulin Pump: Models: PUMP MMT-1885 MM780G 6.5V BLE MMOL; PUMP MMT-1886 MM780G 6.5W BLE MG; KIT MMT-1895WW MM780G 6.5V BLE SF MMOL; KIT MMT-1896WW MM780G 6.5W BLE
- Z-0516-2021 · Apr 30, 2020 · Open, ClassifiedMiniMed 670G, insulin pump, Ref/Model # MMT-1760KPK, MMT-1762KCN, MMT-1762WWK - Product Usage: indicated for continuous or periodic monitoring of glucose levels in the fluid under
- Z-0956-2020 · Nov 21, 2019 · Open, ClassifiedMedtronic MiniMed 670G System with SmartGuard, Ref #s/Model Number(s) - MMT-1741, MMT-1742, MMT-1760, MMT-1761, MMT-1762, MMT-1580, MMT-1581, MMT-1582, MMT-1780, MMT-1781, and MM
- Z-2605-2017 · May 8, 2017 · TerminatedMiniMed 670G Insulin Infusion Pump, Catalog No. MMT-1580, MMT-1780, MMT-1782, MMT-1760.
- Z-2604-2017 · May 8, 2017 · TerminatedMiniMed 640G Insulin Infusion Pump, Catalog No. MMT-1511, MMT-1711, MMT-1512, MMT-1712, MMT-1551, MMT-1751, MMT-1552, MMT-1752.
Other Artificial pancreas device system, single hormonal control devices
- MiniMed® 670G MMT-1780KPKMedtronic Minimed, Inc. · Artificial pancreas device system, single hormonal control3 recalls78 deaths55,723 reports
- MiniMed® 670G MMT-1780KPKMedtronic Minimed, Inc. · Automated insulin dosing device system, single hormonal control2 recalls51 deaths33,713 reports
- MiniMed®670G MMT-1780KPKMedtronic Minimed, Inc. · Artificial pancreas device system, single hormonal control3 recalls39 deaths28,789 reports
- MiniMed® 670G MMT-1780KLMedtronic Minimed, Inc. · Automated insulin dosing device system, single hormonal control3 recalls8 deaths8,353 reports
- MiniMed® 670G MMT-1780KMedtronic Minimed, Inc. · Artificial pancreas device system, single hormonal control3 recalls7 deaths6,776 reports
- MiniMed® 670G MMT-1780KPKMedtronic Minimed, Inc. · Automated insulin dosing device system, single hormonal control3 recalls10 deaths4,325 reports
- MiniMed™ Reservoir MMT-332AMedtronic Minimed, Inc. · Automated insulin dosing device system, single hormonal control2 deaths3,013 reports
- Guardian™ Sensor (3) MMT-7020AMedtronic Minimed, Inc. · Automated insulin dosing device system, single hormonal control1,304 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page