Visi-Pro™ PXB35-06-37-080Recalls & reported problems
Covidien LP · PXB35-06-37-080 STENT VISI PRO 035 V01 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Visi-Pro (66)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00643169787704), received between Dec 8, 2020 and Dec 8, 2020 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Deformation Due to Compressive Stress” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Deformation Due to Compressive Stress1
- Difficult to Remove1
- Positioning Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 8, 2020Difficult to Remove; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Positioning Problem; Difficult to Remove; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Positioning Problem
PHYSICIAN INTENDED TO USE A VISIPRO BALLOON EXPANDABLE STENT WITH A NON-MEDTRONIC 6FR SHEATH DURING TREATMENT OF THE PATIENT¿S MID COMMON ILIAC ARTERY. SLIGHT VESSEL TORTUOSITY IS REPORTED. NO DAMAGE WAS NOTED TO THE PRODUCT PACKAGING PRIOR TO USE. NO ISSUES WERE NOTED WHEN REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE PACKAGING. IFU WAS FOLLOWED AND THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED WITHOUT ISSUE. THE DEVICE WAS NOT PASSED THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STET. RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED DURING ADVANCEMENT. IT IS REPORTED STENT DEFORMATION OCCURRED IN VIVO DURING POSITIONING/PLACEMENT. WHILE ADVANCING STENT THROUGH SHEATH OVER THE BIFURCATION IT BECAME STUCK AND APPEARED TO KINK UNDER FLUOROSCOPY. IT IS REPORTED DIFFICULTY WAS ENCOUNTERED REMOVING THE DEVICE PRIOR TO STENT DEPLOYMENT. PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO REMOVE STENT, BUT THE STENT BECAME CAUGHT ON SHEATH WHILE REMOVING. THE DELIVERY CATHETER DID NOT CATCH ON STENT UPON WITHDRAWAL. THE DEVICE WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED. STENT STRUTS' WERE NEVER EXPOSED WITHIN THE PATIENT AS IT NEVER LEFT THE SHEATH. NO INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED FOR DEVICE REMOVAL AS PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO PULL BACK OUT OF THE SHEATH. A REPLACEMENT STENT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO PATI
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10968659 ↗
Other Stents, drains and dilators for the biliary ducts devices
- Hurricane™ RX M00545900Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 death705 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171060470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC384 reports
- CRE™ PRO M00558710Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall284 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545920Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls211 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171070470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC265 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171050470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC212 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545940Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls109 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171100470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC203 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page