EverCross™ AB35W07100135 (UDI 00643169974166)Recalls & reported problems
Ev3, Inc · PTA AB35W07100135 EVERCROSS 035 V08 · Class 2
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169974166), received between May 10, 2021 and May 21, 2025 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Burst Container or Vessel” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Burst Container or Vessel2
- Leak/Splash2
- Material Twisted/Bent1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 21, 2025Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY USING THE EVERCROSS 035 BALLOON, THE DEVICE WOULD NOT FULLY INFLATE DUE TO A KINK CAUSING TWISTING IN THE MIDDLE OF THE BALLOON. NO ISSUES WERE NOTED WHEN REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM PACKAGING.THE EVENT OCCURRED AT THE PERIPHERAL ARTERY, SPECIFICALLY THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, WITH MINIMAL TORTUOSITY NOTED. THE LESION WAS A SOFT TISSUE LESION. A DOG-BONE TWIST WAS VISIBLE WITHIN THE BALLOON IN THE VESSEL. IT IS NOT KNOWN IF A RE-WRAP TOOL WAS USED. THE VESSEL WAS POST-DILATED USING THE EVERCROSS PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY DEVICE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW DEVICE, WHICH WAS A MEDTRONIC PRODUCT. THERE WERE NO HEALTH CONSEQUENCES OR IMPACT ON THE PATIENT. .
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22059945 ↗MalfunctionMay 10, 2021Burst Container or Vessel; Leak/Splash; Burst Container or Vessel; Leak/Splash
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PHYSICIAN WAS ATTEMPTING TO USE TWO EVERCROSS PTA BALLOON DEVICE TO TREAT A RIGHT MID/DISTAL SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY POPLITEAL ARTERY LESION IN A PATIENT WITH 85% STENOSIS AND LITTLE TORTUOSITY AND SEVERE CALCIFICATION (CTO). A 0.035NON MEDTRONIC WIRE WAS USED WITH A NON-MEDTRONIC SHEATH AND NON-MEDTRONIC INFLATION DEVICE. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED AS PER IFU. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE FIRST BALLOON BURST OCCURRED DURING INFLATION AT 10ATMS DURING THE 1ST INFLATION. THE SECOND BALLOON BURST OCCURRED DURING INFLATION AT 8ATMS DURING THE 1ST INFLATION. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO PACKAGING (SHELF CARTON, HOOP/TRAY). HEAVILY CALCIFIED SFA LESION, BOTH BALLOONS USED RUPTURED. ALL FRAGMENTS WERE REMOVED WITH NO VESSEL DAMAGE AS PER PHYSICIAN. THERE WERE NO ISSUES NOTED WHEN REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE HOOP/TRAY. THE DEVICE DID NOT PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT, RESISTANCE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE DEVICE, NO EXCESSIVE FORCE WAS USED. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH STENTING NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED FOR THIS EVENT
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11798807 ↗MalfunctionMay 10, 2021Burst Container or Vessel; Leak/Splash; Burst Container or Vessel; Leak/Splash
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PHYSICIAN WAS ATTEMPTING TO USE TWO EVERCROSS PTA BALLOON DEVICE TO TREAT A RIGHT MID/DISTAL SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY POPLITEAL ARTERY LESION IN A PATIENT WITH 85% STENOSIS AND LITTLE TORTUOSITY AND SEVERE CALCIFICATION (CTO). A 0.035NON MEDTRONIC WIRE WAS USED WITH A NON-MEDTRONIC SHEATH AND NON-MEDTRONIC INFLATION DEVICE. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED AS PER IFU. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE FIRST BALLOON BURST OCCURRED DURING INFLATION AT 10ATMS DURING THE 1ST INFLATION. THE SECOND BALLOON BURST OCCURRED DURING INFLATION AT 8ATMS DURING THE 1ST INFLATION. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO PACKAGING (SHELF CARTON, HOOP/TRAY). HEAVILY CALCIFIED SFA LESION, BOTH BALLOONS USED RUPTURED. ALL FRAGMENTS WERE REMOVED WITH NO VESSEL DAMAGE AS PER PHYSICIAN. THERE WERE NO ISSUES NOTED WHEN REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE HOOP/TRAY. THE DEVICE DID NOT PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT, RESISTANCE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE DEVICE, NO EXCESSIVE FORCE WAS USED. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH STENTING NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED FOR THIS EVENT
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11798773 ↗
Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices
- Coyote™ ES H74939135152010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal879 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135204010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal585 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135202010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal437 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135304010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal384 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135404010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal293 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939134152010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal279 reports
- Coyote™ H74939185202210Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal200 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135254010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal127 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.