Skip to content

FLIXENE SLIDER GDS 25061Recalls & reported problems

Atrium Medical Corporation · 6MMX40CM FLIXENE GRAFT, GW, W/GDS · Class 2 · Implant

All models of FLIXENE SLIDER GDS (17)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00650862250619), received between Jul 15, 2019 and Nov 15, 2022 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Remove” (1 report).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Recalls naming this device

  1. May 3, 2024Open, Classified

    Complaints of reported separation of the Slider GDS Swivel Rod from the Swivel Core and of a notable gap between the two pieces.

    Z-2004-2024 · Root cause: Equipment maintenance · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Remove1
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • Obstruction/Occlusion1
  • Thrombosis/Thrombus1
  • Vascular Dissection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 15, 2022Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    ON (B)(6) 2022, USE FLIXENE 6MM40CM AND EMBED ABOUT 20CM LIKE THE ATTACHED FILE SCHEMA. ON (B)(6) OCCLUSION AND ORGANIC THROMBUS WERE OBSERVED IN THE ELBOW JOINT, AND BLOOD FLOW RESUMED WITH SHUNT MASSAGE. ON (B)(6), AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO REMOVE THE REMAINING THROMBUS BY DIRECT SURGERY, AND WHEN A LATERAL INCISION WAS MADE AFTER EXPOSING ABOUT 2 CM OF THE ARTIFICIAL BLOOD VESSEL AT THE ELBOW, THE THREE-LAYER STRUCTURE WAS DISSOCIATED. SINCE THIS PART HAS NEVER BEEN PUNCTURED IN THE PAST, IT IS UNLIKELY THAT THE THREE-LAYER STRUCTURE WILL DISSOCIATE. THE PART THAT CAUSED THE DISSECTION IS THE ELBOW JOINT, WHICH IS NORMAL AND CAN BE FLEXED AND STRETCHED.

    Patient problems: Obstruction/Occlusion; Thrombosis/Thrombus; Vascular Dissection

    MAUDE report 15798596 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 15, 2019Difficult to Remove

    RECEIVED REPORT THAT AFTER VEIN ANASTOMOSIS, WHEN THE SURGEON TRIED TO REMOVE THE VINYL BEFORE ARTERIAL ANASTOMOSIS, IT COULD NOT BE REMOVED WELL AND THE ANASTOMOSIS PART WAS REMOVED. THE SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED USING ANOTHER COMPANY'S GRAFT. NO HEALTH DAMAGE TO PATIENTS.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8791284 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT, OF 6MM AND GREATER DIAMETER devices

All PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT, OF 6MM AND GREATER DIAMETER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page