Skip to content

VersaCross Connect Access Solution for FARADRIVE VXAK0043Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · 1 x VersaCross Connect Transseptal Dilator; 1 x VersaCross RF Wire (including 1 x Connector Cable (Single Use)) · Class 2

All models of VersaCross Connect Access Solution for FARADRIVE (4)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00685447019053), received between Oct 31, 2024 and Oct 31, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Human-Device Interface Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Human-Device Interface Problem1

Patient problems

  • Heart Block1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 31, 2024Human-Device Interface Problem; Human-Device Interface Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WENT INTO AV BLOCK. DURING A PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION PROCEDURE, A VERSACROSS CONNECT FOR FARADRIVE KIT WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING PLACEMENT OF THE FARADRIVE AND CONNECT ON THE FOSSA OVALIS, THE SHEATH SLIPPED ANTERIOR. THE PHYSICIAN CLICKED THE SHEATH AND DILATOR BACK TO THE SEPTUM AND THE PATIENT WENT INTO EXTENDED AV BLOCK. THEN, THE CORONARY SINUS CATHETER WAS MOVED TO THE VENTRICLE TO PACE DURING PROCEDURE. THE PACING RATE SLOWLY REDUCED UNTIL INTRINSIC RHYTHM CAME BACK. DURING THE SECOND ATTEMPT TO PLACE THE SHEATH AND DILATOR, THE PATIENT WENT INTO AV BLOCK AGAIN. THE PHYSICIAN BELIEVES, THIS IS IS DUE TO THE SHEATH BEING SO LARGE THAT IT WANTS TO FALL ANTERIOR AND THE DILATOR SO STIFF THAT IT IS TRAUMATIC. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY GO TRANSEPTAL USING THIS PRODUCT. THE PATIENT WAS IN 2:1 BLOCK FOR THE MAJORITY OF THE PROCEDURE, BUT THEIR AV NODE RECOVERED BY THE CASE END. THE PATIENT MIGHT BE KEPT OVERNIGHT FOR OBSERVATION. THE PATIENT MIGHT BE REFERRED FOR A PACEMAKER. THE DEVICE IS NOT EXPECTED TO BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS (DISPOSED). IN THE PHYSICIAN'S OPINION, THE SIZE AND FORM OF THE VERSACROSS CONNECT FITTED INTO THE FARA

    Patient problems: Heart Block

    MAUDE report 20578098 ↗

Other Percutaneous Atrial Catheter Kit devices

All Percutaneous Atrial Catheter Kit devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page