Skip to content

VitaWave VWCA2Recalls & reported problems

Edwards Lifesciences LLC · VitaWave Plus Finger Cuff · Class 2

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00690103219609), received between Nov 26, 2025 and Dec 24, 2025 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings” (4 reports).

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K243781); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 2 reportsDec 2025: 2 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings4

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 24, 2025Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING USE, A VITAWAVE CUFF WITH A PC1Q WAS NOT CORRELATING WITH THE BLOOD PRESSURE CUFF. THE FINGER CUFF AND CABLE SET DISPLAYED LOWER THAN NORMAL DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURES. BOTH DEVICES WERE CONNECTED TO A HEMOSPHERE STEAM. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE CUFF OR CABLE CAUSED THE ISSUE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23891147 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 24, 2025Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING USE, A VITAWAVE CUFF HAD INACCURATE READINGS WHILE CONNECTED TO A VITA MONITOR AND PC1Q CABLE IN A EP PFA CASE. THE VITAWAVE PLUS CUFF WAS PLACED ON THE PATIENT'S MIDDLE RIGHT FINGER. THE NON INVASIVE BLOOD PRESSURE CUFF (NIBP) WAS READING SYSTOLIC/DIASTOLIC IN THE 180/110 WHILE THE FINGER CUFF WAS READING LOWER, PARTICULARLY THE DIASTOLIC PRODUCING A MAP THAT WAS 30 MMHG LOWER THAN THE NIPB. THERE WERE MODERATE VASOCONSTRICTION WARNINGS. THE CUFF WAS THEN PLACED ON THE RING FINGER AND RESTARTED. THE PHYSICAL REACHED 60-70 HOWEVER THE SQI WAS 1 BAR FOR SOME TIME. TOWARDS THE END OF THE CASE, THE FINGER CUFF EVENTUALLY CORRELATED BETTER TO THE SYSTOLIC BUT THE DIASTOLIC WAS STILL LOWER WITH THE MAP OFF BY 10-15MMHG. FINGER CUFF WAS NOT PLACED ON THE SAME ARM AS THE NIBP. NIBP CUFF WAS SET TO DO READINGS EVERY 5 THEN 3 DUE TO DISCREPANCY. CLINICIANS TREATED TO THE BRACHIAL ARM CUFF. IT IS UNKNOWN WHETHER ISSUE WAS CAUSED BY THE FINGER CUFF OR PC1Q CABLE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23891135 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 26, 2025Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING INDUCTION, A VITAWAVE PLUS CUFF SHOWED DIFFERENT VALUES COMPARED TO AN ARM CUFF. FINGER CUFF VALUES WERE 146/63 (93) WHILE THE ARM CUFF READ 165/70 (106). AFTER A FEW ARM ADJUSTMENTS WERE MADE AND RECLIPPING THE PC1Q, THE FINGER CUFF VALUES WERE UPDATED TO 118/52 (75) AND THE ARM CUFF VALUES WERE 130/55 (80). PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A SPINE PROCEDURE. BOTH CUFFS WERE NOT PLACED ON THE SAME ARM. IT IS UNKNOWN WHETHER THE INACCURATE VALUES WERE CAUSED BY THE VITAWAVE PLUS CUFF OR THE PC1Q. THERE WERE NO PATIENT INJURIES.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23659709 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 26, 2025Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING INDUCTION AND AFTER STAIRSTEPS, A VITAWAVE PLUS CUFF HAD NO WAVEFORM AND DIFFERENT PRESSURE VALUES COMPARED TO AN A-LINE. READINGS FROM THE VITAWAVE CUFF WAS 188/62 WHILE THE A-LINE READ 144/93. PHYSICIAN SWITCHED FINGERS BUT STILL STRUGGLED TO GET A WAVEFORM. AFTER REINITIALIZING THE PUMP A COUPLE OF TIMES, ISSUE WAS RESOLVED. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE ISSUE WAS WITH THE FINGER CUFF OR MONITOR. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURIES REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23659487 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K243781. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-3250-2026 · Aug 11, 2026 · Open, Classified
    ForeSight Elite Tissue Oximetry Cable REF HEMFSM10 UDI-DI code: 00690103210927 The non-invasive ForeSight oximeter cable is intended for use as an adjunct monitor of absolute regi

Other Computer, Diagnostic, Programmable devices

All Computer, Diagnostic, Programmable devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page