ZIO AT Patch A100A100XRecalls & reported problems
Irhythm Technologies, Inc. · ZIO AT ECG Monitoring Service · Class 2
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
Quick summary
This iRhythm Zio AT heart monitor patch appears in 631 adverse event reports, including 79 injuries and 14 deaths. Most reports describe heart events that were never transmitted to the care team. There is 1 open recall, started in September 2022, over delayed alerts before patient registration is complete and a limit on how many readings a patch can send.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 629
- Deaths reported
- 14
- Injuries reported
- 79
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 629 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00869770000210), received between Aug 14, 2018 and Aug 28, 2026 — classified as 14 deaths, 79 injuries, 536 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Transmit Record” (524 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Sep 28, 2022Open, Classified
Ambulatory ECG monitoring system labeling update: 1) Clinically actionable arrhythmia notifications delayed until patient registration is complete; 2) Patches limited to 100 symptomatic and 500 asymptomatic wireless transmissions; once the maximum transmission limit is reached for either type, any further transmissions for that type will cease. Risk of delayed reporting to health providers.
Z-0183-2023 · Root cause: Device Design · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Transmit Record524
- Patient-Device Incompatibility56
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem17
- Use of Device Problem15
- Inaccurate Information11
- Patient Data Problem3
- False Positive Result2
- Insufficient Device Problem Information2
Patient problems
- Unspecified Heart Problem543
- Skin Inflammation/ Irritation38
- Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction16
- Insufficient Information12
- Contact Dermatitis6
- Skin Irritation6
- Skin Infection5
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 629 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 28, 2026Failure to Transmit Record
Patient problems: Unspecified Heart Problem
MAUDE report 50501485 ↗MalfunctionJul 10, 2026Failure to Transmit Record
Patient problems: Unspecified Heart Problem
MAUDE report 25781550 ↗MalfunctionJun 30, 2026Failure to Transmit Record
THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN ARRHYTHMIA THAT MET MEDICAL DOCTOR NOTIFICATION (MDN) REQUIREMENTS THAT WAS NOT TRANSMITTED DURING THE WEAR PERIOD. THE INVESTIGATION CONFIRMED THE ZIO AT REACHED THE ASYMPTOMATIC MAXIMUM TRANSMISSION LIMIT. THE HCP ACCOUNT WAS NOTIFIED THAT THE DEVICE WAS APPROACHING THE ASYMPTOMATIC TRANSMISSION LIMIT PRIOR TO REACHING THE LIMIT, ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD PROCESS, AND A REPLACEMENT DEVICE WAS SHIPPED. NO ADVERSE EVENTS, SUCH AS DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY, ARE KNOWN TO HAVE OCCURRED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Heart Problem
MAUDE report 25667286 ↗MalfunctionJun 26, 2026Failure to Transmit Record
THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN ARRHYTHMIA THAT MET MEDICAL DOCTOR NOTIFICATION (MDN) REQUIREMENTS THAT WAS NOT TRANSMITTED DURING THE WEAR PERIOD. THE INVESTIGATION CONFIRMED THE ZIO AT REACHED THE ASYMPTOMATIC MAXIMUM TRANSMISSION LIMIT. THE HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) ACCOUNT WAS NOTIFIED THAT THE DEVICE WAS APPROACHING THE ASYMPTOMATIC TRANSMISSION LIMIT PRIOR TO REACHING THE LIMIT, ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD PROCESS, AND A REPLACEMENT DEVICE WAS SHIPPED. NO ADVERSE EVENTS, SUCH AS DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY, ARE KNOWN TO HAVE OCCURRED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Heart Problem
MAUDE report 25638965 ↗MalfunctionJun 25, 2026Failure to Transmit Record
THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN ARRHYTHMIA THAT MET MEDICAL DOCTOR NOTIFICATION (MDN) REQUIREMENTS THAT WAS NOT TRANSMITTED DURING THE WEAR PERIOD. THE INVESTIGATION CONFIRMED THE ZIO AT REACHED THE ASYMPTOMATIC MAXIMUM TRANSMISSION LIMIT. THE HCP ACCOUNT WAS NOTIFIED THAT THE DEVICE WAS APPROACHING THE ASYMPTOMATIC TRANSMISSION LIMIT PRIOR TO REACHING THE LIMIT, ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD PROCESS, AND A REPLACEMENT DEVICE WAS SHIPPED. IRHYTHM NOTIFIED THE HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) OF THE PATIENT¿S ARRYTHMIA VIA FINAL REPORT. NO ADVERSE EVENTS, SUCH AS DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY, ARE KNOWN TO HAVE OCCURRED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Heart Problem
MAUDE report 25619211 ↗MalfunctionJun 18, 2026Failure to Transmit Record
THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN ARRHYTHMIA THAT MET MEDICAL DOCTOR NOTIFICATION (MDN) REQUIREMENTS THAT WAS NOT TRANSMITTED DURING THE WEAR PERIOD. THE INVESTIGATION CONCLUDED THAT THE ARRHYTHMIA WAS NOT TRANSMITTED DURING WEAR DUE TO A LOW BATTERY IN THE GATEWAY. IRHYTHM NOTIFIED THE HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) OF THE PATIENT¿S ARRYTHMIA. NO ADVERSE EVENTS, SUCH AS DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY, ARE KNOWN TO HAVE OCCURRED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Heart Problem
MAUDE report 25552617 ↗MalfunctionJun 18, 2026Failure to Transmit Record
THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN ARRHYTHMIA THAT MET MEDICAL DOCTOR NOTIFICATION (MDN) REQUIREMENTS THAT WAS NOT TRANSMITTED DURING THE WEAR PERIOD. THE INVESTIGATION CONFIRMED THE ZIO AT REACHED THE ASYMPTOMATIC MAXIMUM TRANSMISSION LIMIT. THE HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) ACCOUNT WAS NOTIFIED THAT THE DEVICE WAS APPROACHING THE ASYMPTOMATIC TRANSMISSION LIMIT PRIOR TO REACHING THE LIMIT, ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD PROCESS, AND A REPLACEMENT DEVICE WAS SHIPPED. ADDITIONAL FOLLOW-UP WAS PERFORMED WITH THE ACCOUNT TO NOTIFY OF THE PATIENT'S ARRHYTHMIA. THERE WERE NO DELAYS IN TREATMENT, AND NO ADVERSE EVENTS, SUCH AS DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY, ARE KNOWN TO HAVE OCCURRED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Heart Problem
MAUDE report 25548242 ↗InjuryMay 21, 2026Patient-Device Incompatibility
THE PRESENTED TO URGENT CARE WITH SKIN IRRITATION ALLEGEDLY CAUSED BY THE ZIO AT. THE PATIENT REPORTED EXPERIENCING A SPREADING RASH, ITCHING AND HIVES. THE PATIENT STATED THAT THEY REMOVED THE DEVICE AND OBSERVED BLEEDING AT THE APPLICATION SITE. THE PATIENT WAS EVALUATED BY A HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) AT URGENT CARE, WHERE THEY RECEIVED A STEROID INJECTION AND WERE PRESCRIBED TOPICAL CORTISONE CREAM FOR TREATMENT.
Patient problems: Skin Inflammation/ Irritation
MAUDE report 25240504 ↗InjuryMay 21, 2026Patient Data Problem
THE PATIENT PRESENTED TO THEIR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) WITH SKIN IRRITATION ALLEGEDLY CAUSED BY THE ZIO AT. THE PATIENT REPORTED EXPERIENCING A RASH, ITCHING, REDNESS AND A WARM SENSATION AT THE APPLICATION SITE. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED. THE HCP DIAGNOSED AN ALLERGIC REACTION AND PRESCRIBED TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE FOR TREATMENT.
Patient problems: Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction
MAUDE report 25240503 ↗MalfunctionMay 19, 2026Failure to Transmit Record
THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN ARRHYTHMIA THAT MET MEDICAL DOCTOR NOTIFICATION (MDN) REQUIREMENTS THAT WAS NOT TRANSMITTED DURING THE WEAR PERIOD. THE INVESTIGATION CONFIRMED THE ZIO AT REACHED THE ASYMPTOMATIC MAXIMUM TRANSMISSION LIMIT. THE HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) ACCOUNT WAS NOTIFIED THAT THE DEVICE WAS APPROACHING THE ASYMPTOMATIC TRANSMISSION LIMIT PRIOR TO REACHING THE LIMIT, ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD PROCESS, AND A REPLACEMENT DEVICE WAS SHIPPED. ADDITIONAL FOLLOW-UP WAS PERFORMED WITH THE ACCOUNT TO NOTIFY OF THE PATIENT'S ARRHYTHMIA. THERE WERE NO DELAYS IN TREATMENT, AND NO ADVERSE EVENTS, SUCH AS DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY, ARE KNOWN TO HAVE OCCURRED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Heart Problem
MAUDE report 25224885 ↗InjuryMay 8, 2026Patient-Device Incompatibility
THE PATIENT PRESENTED TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM (ER) WITH SKIN IRRITATION ALLEGEDLY CAUSED BY THE ZIO AT. THE PATIENT¿S SON REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT DEVELOPED A RASH AT THE APPLICATION SITE. THE DEVICE WAS SUBSEQUENTLY REMOVED. WHILE IN THE ER, THE PATIENT WAS EVALUATED BY A HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP), WHO DIAGNOSED AN ALLERGIC REACTION AND PRESCRIBED AN UNSPECIFIED TOPICAL CREAM FOR TREATMENT.
Patient problems: Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction
MAUDE report 25128641 ↗InjuryApr 29, 2026Patient-Device Incompatibility
THE PATIENT REPORTED SEEKING EVALUATION FROM A HEALTHCARE PROVIDER FOR ITCHING, REDNESS, PAIN, BURNING SENSATION AND A RASH AT THE ZIO AT DEVICE APPLICATION SITE. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED. ACCORDING TO THE PATIENT, THE HCP PRESCRIBED AN UNSPECIFIED MEDICATION.
Patient problems: Skin Inflammation/ Irritation
MAUDE report 25031921 ↗InjuryApr 29, 2026Patient-Device Incompatibility
THE PATIENT REPORTED SEEKING EVALUATION FROM AN URGENT CARE FACILITY FOR A BURN AND ALLERGIC REACTION ALLEGEDLY CAUSED BY THE ZIO AT DEVICE. THE PATIENT DESCRIBED REDNESS, ITCHING, PAIN AND A BURNING SENSATION AT THE DEVICE APPLICATION SITE, ATTRIBUTING THE BURNING SENSATION TO THE DEVICE BATTERY. ACCORDING TO THE PATIENT, THE HEALTHCARE PROVIDER DIAGNOSED THE CONDITION AS EITHER CONTACT DERMATITIS OR A POSSIBLE BURN. THE PATIENT WAS PRESCRIBED SILVER SULFADIAZINE CREAM TO TREAT THE AFFECTED AREA.
Patient problems: Contact Dermatitis
MAUDE report 25028076 ↗MalfunctionApr 29, 2026Failure to Transmit Record
THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN ARRHYTHMIA THAT MET MEDICAL DOCTOR NOTIFICATION (MDN) REQUIREMENTS THAT WAS NOT TRANSMITTED DURING THE WEAR PERIOD. THE INVESTIGATION CONFIRMED THE ZIO AT REACHED THE ASYMPTOMATIC MAXIMUM TRANSMISSION LIMIT. THE HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) ACCOUNT WAS NOTIFIED THAT THE DEVICE WAS APPROACHING THE ASYMPTOMATIC TRANSMISSION LIMIT PRIOR TO REACHING THE LIMIT, ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD PROCESS, AND A REPLACEMENT DEVICE WAS OFFERED BUT DECLINED. ADDITIONAL FOLLOW-UP WAS PERFORMED WITH THE ACCOUNT TO NOTIFY OF THE PATIENT'S ARRHYTHMIA. THERE WERE NO DELAYS IN TREATMENT, AND NO ADVERSE EVENTS, SUCH AS DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY, ARE KNOWN TO HAVE OCCURRED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Heart Problem
MAUDE report 25027695 ↗MalfunctionApr 24, 2026Failure to Transmit Record
THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN ARRHYTHMIA THAT MET MEDICAL DOCTOR NOTIFICATION (MDN) CRITERIA; HOWEVER, THE EVENT WAS NOT TRANSMITTED DURING THE WEAR PERIOD. THE INVESTIGATION DETERMINED THAT THE GATEWAY PREMATURELY STOPPED TRANSMITTING NEW DATA. THE HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) WAS NOTIFIED OF THE PATIENT¿S ARRHYTHMIA. NO DELAYS IN PATIENT TREATMENT WERE REPORTED, AND NO ADVERSE EVENTS, INCLUDING DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY, ARE KNOWN TO HAVE OCCURRED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Heart Problem
MAUDE report 24980561 ↗InjuryApr 20, 2026Patient-Device Incompatibility
THE PATIENT PRESENTED TO THEIR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) WITH SKIN IRRITATION ALLEGEDLY CAUSED BY THE ZIO AT. THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED ITCHING AT THE APPLICATION SITE. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT¿S LEFT SIDE. DESPITE THE REACTION, THE HCP APPLIED A SECOND ZIO AT ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF PATIENT¿S CHEST AND PRESCRIBED BENADRYL TO TREAT THE REACTION.
Patient problems: Skin Inflammation/ Irritation
MAUDE report 24932718 ↗MalfunctionApr 16, 2026Failure to Transmit Record
THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN ARRHYTHMIA THAT MET MEDICAL DOCTOR NOTIFICATION (MDN) REQUIREMENTS THAT WAS NOT TRANSMITTED DURING THE WEAR PERIOD. THE INVESTIGATION CONFIRMED THE ZIO AT REACHED THE ASYMPTOMATIC MAXIMUM TRANSMISSION LIMIT. THE HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) ACCOUNT WAS NOTIFIED THAT THE DEVICE WAS APPROACHING THE ASYMPTOMATIC TRANSMISSION LIMIT PRIOR TO REACHING THE LIMIT, ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD PROCESS, AND A REPLACEMENT DEVICE WAS SHIPPED. ADDITIONAL FOLLOW-UP WAS PERFORMED WITH THE ACCOUNT TO NOTIFY OF THE PATIENT'S ARRHYTHMIA. THERE WERE NO DELAYS IN TREATMENT, AND NO ADVERSE EVENTS, SUCH AS DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY, ARE KNOWN TO HAVE OCCURRED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Heart Problem
MAUDE report 24895347 ↗MalfunctionApr 13, 2026Patient-Device Incompatibility
THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN ARRHYTHMIA THAT MET MEDICAL DOCTOR NOTIFICATION (MDN) REQUIREMENTS THAT WAS NOT TRANSMITTED DURING THE WEAR PERIOD. THE INVESTIGATION CONFIRMED THE ZIO AT REACHED THE ASYMPTOMATIC MAXIMUM TRANSMISSION LIMIT. THE HCP ACCOUNT WAS NOTIFIED THAT THE DEVICE WAS APPROACHING THE ASYMPTOMATIC TRANSMISSION LIMIT PRIOR TO REACHING THE LIMIT, ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD PROCESS, AND A REPLACEMENT DEVICE WAS SHIPPED. NO ADVERSE EVENTS, SUCH AS DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY, ARE KNOWN TO HAVE OCCURRED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Heart Problem
MAUDE report 24867257 ↗MalfunctionApr 10, 2026Failure to Transmit Record
THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN ARRHYTHMIA THAT MET MEDICAL DOCTOR NOTIFICATION (MDN) REQUIREMENTS THAT WAS NOT TRANSMITTED DURING THE WEAR PERIOD. THE INVESTIGATION CONFIRMED THE ZIO AT REACHED THE ASYMPTOMATIC MAXIMUM TRANSMISSION LIMIT. THE HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) ACCOUNT WAS NOTIFIED THAT THE DEVICE WAS APPROACHING THE ASYMPTOMATIC TRANSMISSION LIMIT PRIOR TO REACHING THE LIMIT, ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD PROCESS, AND A REPLACEMENT DEVICE WAS SHIPPED. ADDITIONAL FOLLOW-UP WAS PERFORMED WITH THE ACCOUNT TO NOTIFY OF THE PATIENT'S ARRHYTHMIA. THERE WERE NO DELAYS IN TREATMENT, AND NO ADVERSE EVENTS, SUCH AS DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY, ARE KNOWN TO HAVE OCCURRED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Heart Problem
MAUDE report 24845052 ↗MalfunctionApr 9, 2026Failure to Transmit Record
THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN ARRHYTHMIA THAT MET MEDICAL DOCTOR NOTIFICATION (MDN) REQUIREMENTS THAT WAS NOT TRANSMITTED DURING THE WEAR PERIOD. THE INVESTIGATION CONFIRMED THE ZIO AT REACHED THE ASYMPTOMATIC MAXIMUM TRANSMISSION LIMIT. THE HCP ACCOUNT WAS NOTIFIED THAT THE DEVICE WAS APPROACHING THE ASYMPTOMATIC TRANSMISSION LIMIT PRIOR TO REACHING THE LIMIT, ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD PROCESS, AND A REPLACEMENT DEVICE WAS SHIPPED. NO ADVERSE EVENTS, SUCH AS DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY, ARE KNOWN TO HAVE OCCURRED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Heart Problem
MAUDE report 24835672 ↗MalfunctionApr 3, 2026Failure to Transmit Record
THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN ARRHYTHMIA THAT MET MEDICAL DOCTOR NOTIFICATION (MDN) REQUIREMENTS THAT WAS NOT TRANSMITTED DURING THE WEAR PERIOD. THE INVESTIGATION CONFIRMED THE ZIO AT REACHED THE ASYMPTOMATIC MAXIMUM TRANSMISSION LIMIT. THE HCP ACCOUNT WAS NOTIFIED THAT THE DEVICE WAS APPROACHING THE ASYMPTOMATIC TRANSMISSION LIMIT PRIOR TO REACHING THE LIMIT, ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD PROCESS, AND A REPLACEMENT DEVICE WAS SHIPPED. NO ADVERSE EVENTS, SUCH AS DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY, ARE KNOWN TO HAVE OCCURRED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Heart Problem
MAUDE report 24781670 ↗MalfunctionApr 3, 2026Failure to Transmit Record
THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN ARRHYTHMIA THAT MET MEDICAL DOCTOR NOTIFICATION (MDN) REQUIREMENTS THAT WAS NOT TRANSMITTED DURING THE WEAR PERIOD. THE INVESTIGATION CONFIRMED THE ZIO AT REACHED THE ASYMPTOMATIC MAXIMUM TRANSMISSION LIMIT. THE HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) ACCOUNT WAS NOTIFIED THAT THE DEVICE WAS APPROACHING THE ASYMPTOMATIC TRANSMISSION LIMIT PRIOR TO REACHING THE LIMIT, ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD PROCESS, AND A REPLACEMENT DEVICE WAS SHIPPED. ADDITIONAL FOLLOW-UP WAS PERFORMED WITH THE ACCOUNT TO NOTIFY OF THE PATIENT'S ARRHYTHMIA. THERE WERE NO DELAYS IN TREATMENT, AND NO ADVERSE EVENTS, SUCH AS DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY, ARE KNOWN TO HAVE OCCURRED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Heart Problem
MAUDE report 24781607 ↗MalfunctionApr 3, 2026Failure to Transmit Record
THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN ARRHYTHMIA THAT MET MEDICAL DOCTOR NOTIFICATION (MDN) REQUIREMENTS THAT WAS NOT TRANSMITTED DURING THE WEAR PERIOD. THE INVESTIGATION CONFIRMED THE ZIO AT REACHED THE ASYMPTOMATIC MAXIMUM TRANSMISSION LIMIT. THE HCP ACCOUNT WAS NOTIFIED THAT THE DEVICE WAS APPROACHING THE ASYMPTOMATIC TRANSMISSION LIMIT PRIOR TO REACHING THE LIMIT, ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD PROCESS, AND A REPLACEMENT DEVICE WAS SHIPPED. NO ADVERSE EVENTS, SUCH AS DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY, ARE KNOWN TO HAVE OCCURRED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Heart Problem
MAUDE report 24776604 ↗InjuryApr 3, 2026Patient-Device Incompatibility
THE PATIENT PRESENTED TO THEIR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER WITH A SKIN IRRITATION ALLEGEDLY CAUSED BY THE ZIO AT. THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A RASH, ITCHING, AND A BURNING SENSATION AT THE APPLICATION SITE. THE DEVICE WAS SUBSEQUENTLY REMOVED. THE PATIENT WAS EVALUATED BY A HEALTHCARE PROVIDER, WHO CONFIRMED THE PRESENCE OF A RASH AND PRESCRIBED TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE CREAM FOR TREATMENT.
Patient problems: Skin Inflammation/ Irritation
MAUDE report 24776603 ↗MalfunctionMar 24, 2026Failure to Transmit Record
THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN ARRHYTHMIA THAT MET MEDICAL DOCTOR NOTIFICATION (MDN) REQUIREMENTS THAT WAS NOT TRANSMITTED DURING THE WEAR PERIOD. THE INVESTIGATION CONFIRMED THE ZIO AT REACHED THE ASYMPTOMATIC MAXIMUM TRANSMISSION LIMIT. THE HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) ACCOUNT WAS NOTIFIED THAT THE DEVICE WAS APPROACHING THE ASYMPTOMATIC TRANSMISSION LIMIT PRIOR TO REACHING THE LIMIT, ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD PROCESS, AND A REPLACEMENT DEVICE WAS OFFERED BUT DECLINED. THE HCP ACCOUNT WAS NOTIFIED OF THE PATIENT'S ARRHYTHMIA VIA FINAL REPORT. THERE WERE NO DELAYS IN TREATMENT, AND NO ADVERSE EVENTS, SUCH AS DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY, ARE KNOWN TO HAVE OCCURRED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Heart Problem
MAUDE report 24676850 ↗
Other Computer, Diagnostic, Programmable devices
- CARTO 3 FG540000Biosense Webster (Israel) Ltd. · Computer, diagnostic, programmable1 death437 reports
- Sensis 10764561Siemens Healthcare GmbH · COMPUTER, DIAGNOSTIC, PROGRAMMABLE5 recalls8 reports
- Sensis Vibe Hemo 11007641Siemens Healthcare GmbH · COMPUTER, DIAGNOSTIC, PROGRAMMABLE4 recalls1 death22 reports
- Sensis Vibe Combo 11007642Siemens Healthcare GmbH · COMPUTER, DIAGNOSTIC, PROGRAMMABLE4 recalls1 death6 reports
- Change Healthcare Cardiology Hemo 15.1Change Healthcare Canada Company · Computer, Diagnostic, Programmable4 recalls1 report
- Change Healthcare Cardiology Hemo 15.0.1Change Healthcare Canada Company · Computer, Diagnostic, Programmable3 recalls1 death1 report
- Change Healthcare Cardiology Hemo 14.3.2Change Healthcare Canada Company · Computer, Diagnostic, Programmable3 recalls0 reports
- CARESCAPE CENTRAL STATION MAI800Ge Medical Systems Information Technologies, Inc. · Computer, Diagnostic, Programmable3 recalls0 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.