Skip to content

GORE-TEX Stretch Vascular Graft S0607Recalls & reported problems

W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · STRETCH VASCULAR GRAFT SW 6mmX70cm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of GORE-TEX Stretch Vascular Graft (10)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00733132611317), received between Apr 26, 2022 and Oct 1, 2022 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Contamination” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Contamination1
  • Microbial Contamination of Device1

Patient problems

  • Bacterial Infection2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 1, 2022Microbial Contamination of Device; Microbial Contamination of Device

    THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A CRITICAL ISCHEMIA BECAUSE OF STENOSIS (80 %) OF THE LEFT INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY DUE TO CHRONIC ATHEROSCLEROTIC ARTERIAL DISEASE. REPORTEDLY, THE PATIENT HAD NO HISTORY OF SYSTEMIC INFECTION OR PREEXISTING INFECTION IN THE TREATMENT AREA. ON (B)(6) 2021, A GORE-TEX® STRETCH VASCULAR GRAFT WAS IMPLANTED AS A CAROTIDO-CAROTID BYPASS FROM THE RIGHT SIDE TO THE LEFT SIDE TO TREAT THE CRITICAL ISCHEMIA. THE ANASTOMOSES WERE AT THE RIGHT CAROTID BIFURCATION AND AT THE LEFT INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY DISTALLY OF THE LESION. ON (B)(6) 2022, THE GRAFT WAS EXPLANTED DUE TO AN INFECTION. IT REMAINS UNKNOWN WHEN THE INFECTION WAS FIRST IDENTIFIED AND WHICH BACTERIA CONTRIBUTED TO THE INFECTION. IT REMAINS ALSO UNKNOWN WHAT FURTHER TREATMENTS WERE PERFORMED TO RESOLVE THE INFECTION. REPORTEDLY, THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION AS TO WHY THE GRAFT BECAME INFECTED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN HAS NO SUSPICION THAT THE GORE GRAFT OR THE PROCEDURE CONTRIBUTED TO THE INFECTION.

    Patient problems: Bacterial Infection

    MAUDE report 15525966 ↗
  • InjuryApr 26, 2022Contamination; Contamination

    IT WAS REPORTED TO GORE THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGICAL TREATMENT TO CREATE AN ACCESS FOR HEMODIALYSIS WITH A GORE-TEX® STRETCH VASCULAR GRAFT ¿ STANDARD-WALLED. IT WAS STATED THAT THE VASCULAR GRAFT WAS IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2021. IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2021, AFTER ABOUT 4 MONTHS, THE VASCULAR GRAFT WAS EXPLANTED DUE TO INFECTION WITH STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS MÉTI-R. A SEGMENT OF THE GRAFT WAS SENT FOR ANALYSIS.

    Patient problems: Bacterial Infection

    MAUDE report 14201693 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT, OF 6MM AND GREATER DIAMETER devices

All PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT, OF 6MM AND GREATER DIAMETER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page