Skip to content

NanoCross™ Elite AB14W025040150 (UDI 00763000109608)Recalls & reported problems

Ev3, Inc · PTA AB14W025040150 NANOCROSS 014 V05 · Class 2

All models of NanoCross Elite (63)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000109608), received between Apr 3, 2023 and Nov 14, 2023 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Burst Container or Vessel” (2 reports).

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K141118); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 2 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Burst Container or Vessel2
  • Deflation Problem1
  • Difficult to Remove1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 14, 2023Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    TWO (2) NANOCROSS PTA BALLOONS WERE BEING USED FOR THE TREATMENT OF A CALCIFIED LESION WITH 80% STENOSIS IN THE PROXIMAL/MID REGION OF THE LEFT TIBIAL/POPLITEAL TRUNK (TPT). THE DEVICES WERE PREPPED AS PER THE IFU WITH NO ISSUES IDENTIFIED. AN INFLATION DEVICE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED THE BALLOONS BURST AT 14ATMS. THE BALLOONS HAD NOT PASSED THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. RESISTANCE WAS MET DURING ADVANCEMENT. THE PHYSICIAN TRIED TO REMOVE WITH A SNARE. THEY WERE UNABLE TO REMOVE IN ONE PIECE AND DID NOT WANT TO BLOCK OFF THE AT SO THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO LEAVE THE BALLOON IN THE TPT. THE SAME ISSUE OCCURRED WITH THE SECOND BALLOON NO FURTHER PATIENT INJURY REPORTED FOR THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18129111 ↗
  • InjuryNov 14, 2023Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    TWO (2) NANOCROSS PTA BALLOONS WERE BEING USED FOR THE TREATMENT OF A CALCIFIED LESION WITH 80% STENOSIS IN THE PROXIMAL/MID REGION OF THE LEFT TIBIAL/POPLITEAL TRUNK (TPT). THE DEVICES WERE PREPPED AS PER THE IFU WITH NO ISSUES IDENTIFIED. AN INFLATION DEVICE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED THE BALLOONS BURST AT 14ATMS. THE BALLOONS HAD NOT PASSED THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. RESISTANCE WAS MET DURING ADVANCEMENT. THE PHYSICIAN TRIED TO REMOVE WITH A SNARE. THEY WERE UNABLE TO REMOVE IN ONE PIECE AND DID NOT WANT TO BLOCK OFF THE AT SO THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO LEAVE THE BALLOON IN THE TPT. THE SAME ISSUE OCCURRED WITH THE SECOND BALLOON NO FURTHER PATIENT INJURY REPORTED FOR THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18129097 ↗
  • InjuryApr 3, 2023Deflation Problem; Difficult to Remove; Deflation Problem; Difficult to Remove

    A NANOCROSS PTA BALLOON WAS USED TO TREAT THE BTK (PERONEAL VESSEL). A NON MEDTRONIC INFLATION DEVICE WAS USED. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED AS PER THE IFU WITH NO ISSUES IDENTIFIED. IT WAS REPORTED THE BALLOON WOULD NOT DEFLATE AT LESION SITE, HAD TO BURST THE BALLOON TO TRY AND GET IT TO FULLY DEFLATE. THERE WAS DIFFICULTY ENCOUNTERED WHEN REMOVING THE BALLOON FOLLOWING INFLATION, THE DISTAL PARTOF BALLOON STILL WOULD NOT DEFLATE. TRIED TO REMOVE THE BALLOON THRU A 6FR SHEATH THAT WAS IN PLACE AND IT WOULD NOT PULL THRU THE SHEATH, THE PHYSICIAN HAD TO REMOVE THE ENTIRE SHEATH AND BALLOON AND WAS REPLACED WITH A 7FR SHEATH. THE PHYSICIAN HAD TO DO A SMALL CUT DOWN IN ORDER TO REMOVE THE BALLOON FROM THE PATIENT. THE DEVICE DID NOT PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. PATIENT IS DOING WELL.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16662471 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K141118. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0904-2025 · Dec 10, 2024 · Open, Classified
    Medtronic NanoCross Elite PTA catheter, REF numbers amd sizes: 1) AB14W050020090, Size: 5MM X 20MM X 90CM; 2) AB14W050020150, Size: 5MM X 20MM X 150CM; 3) AB14W050040090,

Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices

All Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page