EverCross™ AB35W06150135 (UDI 00763000184490)Recalls & reported problems
Ev3, Inc · PTA AB35W06150135 EVERCROSS 035 V09 · Class 2
All models of EverCross (114)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000184490), received between Oct 1, 2019 and Jan 4, 2021 — classified as 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Burst Container or Vessel” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Burst Container or Vessel3
- Leak/Splash1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 4, 2021Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel
PHYSICIAN INTENDED TO USE AN EVERCROSS PTA BALLOON WITH A 5FR/6FR SHEATH AND 2 NON-MEDTRONIC 0.035 GUIDEWIRES DURING TREATMENT OF A 250MM CALCIFIED CTO (CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION-100%) IN THE PATIENT¿S MID LEFT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). SEVERE VESSEL CALCIFICATION AND TORTUOSITY IS REPORTED. ARTERY DIAMETER REPORTED AS 6MM. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO THE PRODUCT PACKAGING PRIOR TO USE. NO ISSUES WERE NOTED WHEN REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE PACKAGING. A NON-MEDTRONIC INFLATION DEVICE WAS USED FOR BALLOON INFLATION. THE DEVICE WAS PASSED THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT AND RESISTANCE WAS NOTED. A CIRCUMFERENTIAL BALLOON BURST IS REPORTED AT NOMINAL PRESSURE (8ATM). NO BALLOON FRAGMENTS REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. A SECOND EVERCROSS PTA BALLOON WAS OPENED AND PREPPED WITHOUT ISSUE. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO THE PRODUCT PACKAGING PRIOR TO USE. NO ISSUES WERE NOTED WHEN REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE PACKAGING. A NON-MEDTRONIC INFLATION DEVICE WAS USED FOR BALLOON INFLATION. THE DEVICE WAS PASSED THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT AND RESISTANCE WAS NOTED. A CIRCUMFERENTIAL BALLOON BURST IS REPORTED AT 10ATM. NO BALLOON FRAGMENTS REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. A NON-M EDTRONIC BALL
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11108062 ↗MalfunctionJan 4, 2021Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel
PHYSICIAN INTENDED TO USE AN EVERCROSS PTA BALLOON WITH A 5FR/6FR SHEATH AND 2 NON-MEDTRONIC 0.035 GUIDEWIRES DURING TREATMENT OF A 250MM CALCIFIED CTO (CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION-100%) IN THE PATIENT¿S MID LEFT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). SEVERE VESSEL CALCIFICATION AND TORTUOSITY IS REPORTED. ARTERY DIAMETER REPORTED AS 6MM. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO THE PRODUCT PACKAGING PRIOR TO USE. NO ISSUES WERE NOTED WHEN REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE PACKAGING. A NON-MEDTRONICINFLATION DEVICE WAS USED FOR BALLOON INFLATION. THE DEVICE WAS PASSED THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT AND RESISTANCE WAS NOTED. A CIRCUMFERENTIAL BALLOON BURST IS REPORTED AT NOMINAL PRESSURE (8ATM). NO BALLOON FRAGMENTS REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. A SECOND EVERCROSS PTA BALLOON WAS OPENED AND PREPPED WITHOUT ISSUE. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO THE PRODUCT PACKAGING PRIOR TO USE. NO ISSUES WERE NOTED WHEN REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE PACKAGING. A NON-MEDTRONIC INFLATION DEVICE WAS USED FOR BALLOON INFLATION. THE DEVICE WAS PASSED THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT AND RESISTANCE WAS NOTED. A CIRCUMFERENTIAL BALLOON BURST IS REPORTED AT 10ATM. NO BALLOON FRAGMENTS REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. A NON-M EDTRONIC BALLO
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11108044 ↗MalfunctionAug 7, 2020Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel
PHYSICIAN WAS ATTEMPTING TO USE AN EVERCROSS PTA BALLOON CATHETER ALONG WITH NON-MEDTRONIC 6FR SHEATH AND 0.035" GUIDE WIRE DURING PROCEDURE TO TREAT A SEVERELY CALCIFIED LESION IN THE LEFT MID SUPERFICIAL ARTERY (SFA) WITH CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION (CTO-100%). THE VESSEL DIAMETER AND LESION LENGTH ARE 6MM AND 150MM RESPECTIVELY. A NON-MEDTRONIC DEVICE WAS USED FOR THE INFLATION OF THE BALLOON. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE TO DEVICE PACKAGING. THERE WAS NO ISSUES NOTED WHEN REMOVING DEVICE FROM HOOP/TRAY. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED PER IFU WITH NO ISSUES IDENTIFIED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON BURST AT 12ATM DURING BALLOON INFLATION. THE BALLOON WAS REMOVED. ATHERECTOMY WAS PERFORMED AND A NEW BALLOON WAS ADVANCED AND INFLATED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10378586 ↗MalfunctionOct 1, 2019Leak/Splash; Leak/Splash
PHYSICIAN WAS ATTEMPTING TO USE AN EVERCROSS PTA BALLOON CATHETER, ALONG WITH NON MEDTRONIC 6FR SHEATH AND .014 GUIDE WIRE TO TREAT A SEVERELY CALCIFIED LESION IN THE LEFT MID TO PROXIMAL SFA. WITH CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION (CTO-100%). THE VESSEL DIAMETER AND LESION LENGTH ARE 7MM AND 200 MM RESPECTIVELY. A NON MEDTRONIC INFLATION DEVICE WAS USED TO INFLATE THE BALLOON. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO PACKAGING OR ISSUES NOTED WHEN REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE HOOP/TRAY. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED AS PER IFU WITH NO ISSUES NOTED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING BALLOON INFLATION A PIN HOLE BALLOON LEAK OCCURRED AT 8ATM. THIS OCCURRED DURING SECOND INFLATION. THE DEVICE PASSED THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. NO RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE DEVICE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A 6 X 120 NANOCROSS BALLOON. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9138825 ↗
Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices
- Coyote™ ES H74939135152010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal879 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135204010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal585 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135202010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal437 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135304010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal384 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135404010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal293 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939134152010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal279 reports
- Coyote™ H74939185202210Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal200 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135254010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal127 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page