Skip to content

Chocolate™ CB1413535040OTWRecalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · PTA CB1413535040 CHOCOLATE 014 V05 · Class 2

All models of Chocolate (17)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00763000500061), received between Sep 29, 2026 and Sep 29, 2026 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Insert” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Insert1
  • Difficult to Remove1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 29, 2026Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Remove

    It was reported that during treatment of a 90% stenotic, 30 mm plaque lesion in the mid right tibial/popliteal trunk peripheral artery, with minimal tortuosity and a 4 mm vessel diameter, a 3.5 x 40 Chocolate .014 percutaneous transluminal angioplasty balloon catheter was used through a 6F Destination sheath. The vessel was pre-dilated with a 3 x 80 Nanocross percutaneous transluminal angioplasty balloon catheter, and the lesion remained visible on fluoroscopy. After the Chocolate balloon catheter was opened, inspected, and flushed, resistance was felt when backloading a .014 Command guidewire through the catheter. The guidewire was removed, a new .014 Command ES guidewire was opened, and the Chocolate catheter was re-flushed and backloaded without issue. The Chocolate catheter was tracked through the lesion and inflated without issue using 50/50 contrast. The catheter was removed for follow-up DSA imaging, and the lesion remained visible. Extreme resistance was encountered when reloading the Chocolate catheter over the .014 Command guidewire. Difficulty removing the Chocolate catheter and flushing the balloon catheter lumen were reported. The Chocolate catheter and gui dewire were

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50929054 ↗

Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices

All Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page