Skip to content

Distaflo® Bypass Grafts DFX7006SCRecalls & reported problems

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · Distaflo® Mini-Cuff Bypass Graft With Flex Small Beading, 6 mm x 70 cm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Distaflo Bypass Grafts (15)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741023668), received between Mar 16, 2018 and Nov 25, 2020 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Split, Cut or Torn” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1
  • Obstruction of Flow1
  • Torn Material1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Thrombosis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 25, 2020Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    IT WAS REPORTED DURING SURGICAL GRAFT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE GRAFT ALLEGEDLY TORNED. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT GRAFT ALLEGEDLY TORE IN SEVERAL PLACES WAS THEN SEWN BACK ON THE TORN AREAS DURING THE SURGERY. REPORTEDLY, THE GRAFT WAS LEFT IN THE PATIENT AND THE PROCEDURE COMPLETED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 10902406 ↗
  • InjuryDec 3, 2018Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY ONE MONTH POST BYPASS GRAFT IMPLANTATION IN THE SFA TO THE POPLITEAL ARTERY, THE VASCULAR GRAFT WAS ALLEGEDLY THROMBOSED WITH NO BLOOD FLOW TO THE FOOT. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGERY TO IMPLANT A SECOND BYPASS GRAFT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; Thrombosis

    MAUDE report 8124287 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 16, 2018Torn Material; Torn Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING INTRAOPERATIVE BEADING REMOVAL, HOLES IN THE GRAFT WERE ALLEGEDLY IDENTIFIED AT THE SITE OF THE REMOVED BEADING. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE HEALTH CARE PROVIDER REVISED THE GRAFT AND REMOVED THE AFFECTED SEGMENT. REPORTEDLY, THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7347155 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT, OF 6MM AND GREATER DIAMETER devices

All PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT, OF 6MM AND GREATER DIAMETER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page