Bardex® I.C. Complete Care® Foley Catheter Tray and Urine Meter 303316ARecalls & reported problems
C. R. Bard, Inc. · Bardex® I.C. Complete Care® Foley Catheter Tray and Urine Meter · Class 2
All models of Bardex I.C. Complete Care Foley Catheter Tray and Urine Meter (3)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741024269), received between Oct 23, 2017 and Mar 25, 2025 — classified as 9 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Burst Container or Vessel” (1 report).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Jun 25, 2026Class IIOpen, Classified
Due to complaints received indicating presence of contamination on the surface of pericare wipes provided with various Foley and Intermittent Catheter Trays.
Z-3116-2026 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Burst Container or Vessel1
- Component Missing1
- Contamination /Decontamination Problem1
- Decrease in Pressure1
- Deflation Problem1
- Device Operates Differently Than Expected1
- Device Slipped1
- Inadequate or Insufficient Training1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient3
- No Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 25, 2025Inadequate or Insufficient Training; Wrong Label; Inadequate or Insufficient Training; Wrong Label
IT WAS REPORTED THAT CUSTOMER SAID PACKAGING STATED LATEX FREE, BUT THERE WAS LATEX IN THE PACKAGE. NO ADVERSE EVENT OR PATIENT IMPACT. NURSES WERE CATCHING THIS PRIOR TO USE. PER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 01APR2025, IT WAS REPORTED THAT CUSTOMER WHO INFORMED THAT IT WAS NOT THAT THE PACKAGING STATED LATEX FREE, BUT THERE WAS LATEX IN THE PACKAGE BUT THAT THEY WERE NOT INFORMED THAT BD WAS CHANGING FROM NO LATEX TO USING LATEX IN THE FOLEY TRAY. CUSTOMER STATED THAT HAD GOTTEN THE BIOHAZARD BOX BUT WAS NOT GOING TO SEND ANYTHING BACK, THE COMPLAINT WAS SUBMITTED BASED ON THE LACK OF NOTIFICATION THAT WAS PROVIDED TO THE FACILITY PRIOR TO THE CHANGE. CUSTOMER INFORMED THEY HAD BEEN USING THE PRODUCT FOR YEARS AND IT WAS NEVER LATEX AND PRIOR TO A PROCEDURE IT WAS NOTICED BY THE NURSE. THEY HAD OLD TRAYS THAT HAVE A BLUE DOT INDICATING ITEMS WERE NOT MADE WITH LATEX. THEY HAVE CREATED AN EDUCATION PLAN TO INFORM NURSES OF THE CHANGE AS THIS COULD BE A SAFETY CONCERN.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21688456 ↗MalfunctionOct 12, 2021Component Missing; Component Missing
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THREE ANTISEPTIC SWAB STICKS WERE NOT IN THE FOLEY KIT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12615372 ↗MalfunctionSep 29, 2021Nonstandard Device; Nonstandard Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT CUSTOMER NOTICED THREE OF THE ANTISEPTIC SWAB STICKS IN THE FOLEY TRAY WERE VERY STICKY AND ALSO IT DID NOT HAVE A LOT OF BETADINE ON THEM. HENCE IT WAS VERY DIFFICULT OR ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO PREPARE THE PATIENT¿S GENITALIA WITH THE PREPARATION STICKS AS DIRECTED BY THE MANUFACTURER¿S INSTRUCTIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12547010 ↗MalfunctionSep 29, 2021Short Fill; Short Fill
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CUSTOMER NOTICED THREE OF THE ANTISEPTIC SWAB STICKS IN THE FOLEY TRAY WERE VERY STICKY, AND ALSO IT DID NOT HAVE A LOT OF BETADINE ON THEM. HENCE, IT WAS VERY DIFFICULT OR ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO PREPARE THE PATIENT¿S GENITALIA WITH THE PREPARATION STICKS AS DIRECTED BY THE MANUFACTURER¿S INSTRUCTIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12546178 ↗MalfunctionSep 16, 2020Decrease in Pressure; Device Slipped; Contamination /Decontamination Problem; Decrease in Pressure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TRAY WAS CONTAMINATED. PER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM FOLLOW UP 2 VIA MAIL ON 28AUG2020, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BULB WAS INFLATED AFTER INSERTION OF FOLEY AND FOLEY FELL OUT WHICH OCCURRED ON TWO SEPARATE PATIENTS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10542098 ↗MalfunctionOct 23, 2019Misassembled; Misassembled
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE FOLEY PORT WAS MANUFACTURED BACKWARDS. THE NURSE HAD TO USE A PORT TYPICALLY USED TO PULL TO DEFLATE THE BALLOON VS THE NORMAL PORT TO DEFLATE THE BALLOON. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9226932 ↗MalfunctionJul 17, 2019Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel; Deflation Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A CATHETER PREMATURELY DEFLATED AND A TEAR WAS NOTED IN THE BALLOON, APPROXIMATELY TWO HOURS AFTER INSERTION. THE CATHETER WAS INSERTED ON 6/26/19 AT 0700 IN THE OPERATING ROOM, IN A 47 YEAR OLD FEMALE UNDERGOING A TOTAL LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY. THE CATHETER WAS PLACED WITHOUT RESISTANCE, INFLATED WITH 10ML, AND PLACEMENT WAS CONFIRMED WITH URINE RETURN.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8798819 ↗MalfunctionOct 24, 2017Device Operates Differently Than Expected
IT WAS REPORTED THAT URINE WOULD NOT DRAIN FROM THE CATHETER.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 6971043 ↗MalfunctionOct 23, 2017No Device Output
IT WAS REPORTED THAT URINE WOULD NOT DRAIN FROM THE CATHETER.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6970043 ↗
Other CATHETER, UROLOGICAL (ANTIMICROBIAL) AND ACCESSORIES devices
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® I.C. Temperature-Sensing All-Silicone Foley Catheter 119314C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, UROLOGICAL (ANTIMICROBIAL) AND ACCESSORIES1 recall3,889 reports
- Bardex® I.C. Foley Catheter 0165SI14C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, UROLOGICAL (ANTIMICROBIAL) AND ACCESSORIES1,994 reports
- Bardex® I.C. Foley Catheter 0165SI16C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, UROLOGICAL (ANTIMICROBIAL) AND ACCESSORIES1,052 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® I.C. All-Silicone Foley Catheter 1758SI14C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, UROLOGICAL (ANTIMICROBIAL) AND ACCESSORIES778 reports
- Bardex® I.C. Temperature Sensing Foley Catheter 129414MC. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, UROLOGICAL (ANTIMICROBIAL) AND ACCESSORIES436 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® I.C. All-Silicone Temp Sensing Foley Catheter 119316MC. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, UROLOGICAL (ANTIMICROBIAL) AND ACCESSORIES231 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® I.C. Temperature-Sensing All-Silicone Foley Catheter 119316C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, UROLOGICAL (ANTIMICROBIAL) AND ACCESSORIES198 reports
- Bardex® I.C. Foley Catheter 0165SI18C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, UROLOGICAL (ANTIMICROBIAL) AND ACCESSORIES181 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page