Skip to content

Dorado® DR8044Recalls & reported problems

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · Dorado® PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter 4 mm x 40 mm, 80 cm Catheter · Class 2

All models of Dorado (49)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741058301), received between Jun 20, 2017 and Jun 21, 2024 — classified as 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Leak/Splash3
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Material Rupture1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 21, 2024Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE PTA BALLOON WAS ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED AT FIRST EXTENSION AT 11 ATM. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19584124 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 15, 2022Leak/Splash; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Leak/Splash; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE CONNECTION PART NEAR THE HUB WAS NOT CONNECTED COMPLETELY. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE PRESSURE LEAKAGE WAS CONFIRMED FROM SAME PART. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15795644 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 20, 2021Break; Leak/Splash; Break; Leak/Splash

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE THROUGH SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY VIA CFA/POPLITEAL, THE BALLOON ALLEGEDLY HAD LEAKAGE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12662812 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 8, 2018Break; Leak/Splash; Break; Leak/Splash

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING TREATMENT FOR A SHUNT, THE PTA BALLOON ALLEGEDLY LEAKED ON THE FIRST INFLATION. REPORTEDLY, THERE WAS NO ISSUE RETRACTING THE BALLOON THROUGH THE SHEATH. ANOTHER BALLOON WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7325629 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 18, 2017Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE FOR STENOSIS NEAR AN ANASTOMOTIC SITE, THE HEALTH CARE PROVIDER INFLATED THE BALLOON TO 20 ATM WITH AN INFLATION DEVICE AND TRIED TO KEEP THE BALLOON INFLATED AT THAT PRESSURE FOR 3 MINUTES. REPORTEDLY, AFTER KEEPING THE PRESSURE AT 20 ATM FOR 5 SECONDS THE INFLATION HUB ALLEGEDLY CAME OFF THE CATHETER AND THE CONTRAST MEDIUM SPATTERED. ANOTHER BALLOON CATHETER WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 6873013 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 20, 2017Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE FIRST INFLATION, THE PTA BALLOON CATHETER ALLEGEDLY WOULD NOT HOLD PRESSURE BEYOND 24 ATM. THE BALLOON CATHETER WAS EXCHANGED OVER THE GUIDEWIRE FOR ANOTHER AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. UPON REMOVAL OF THE BALLOON CATHETER, THE HEALTH CARE PROVIDER ALLEGEDLY IDENTIFIED A BREAK AT THE BALLOON-CATHETER BUTT JOINT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 6655754 ↗

Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices

All Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page