Skip to content

Conquest® 40 CQF5074Recalls & reported problems

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · Conquest® 40 PTA Dilatation Catheter 7 mm x 40 mm, 50 cm catheter · Class 2

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741060205), received between Oct 12, 2023 and Jul 4, 2025 — classified as 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (6 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 2 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Rupture6
  • Difficult to Remove5
  • Device-Device Incompatibility1
  • Difficult to Open or Remove Packaging Material1
  • Failure to Advance1
  • Inflation Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions7

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 4, 2025Difficult to Remove; Failure to Advance; Device-Device Incompatibility; Difficult to Remove; Failure to Advance; Device-Device Incompatibility

    ON (B)(6) 2025, A 60-YEAR-OLD MALE PATIENT UNDERWENT A PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) PROCEDURE USING THE CONQUEST 40 PTA BALLOON CATHETER FOR CEPHALIC VEIN FISTULA. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON CATHETER ALLEGEDLY CANNOT REWIRE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A DIFFICULTY IN RETRACTING THE BALLOON THRU THE SHEATH. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22402853 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 10, 2025Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE PTA BALLOON WAS ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED AT 8 ATM. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21121858 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 26, 2024Inflation Problem; Difficult to Remove; Material Rupture; Difficult to Open or Remove Packaging Material; Inflation Problem; Difficult to Remove; Material Rupture; Difficult to Open or Remove Packaging Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE PTA BALLOON ALLEGEDLY HAD SOME RESISTANCE TO REMOVE THE BALLOON PROTECTOR. REPORTEDLY, THE PTA BALLOON RUPTURED AT 8 ATM. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21016831 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 20, 2023Difficult to Remove; Material Rupture; Difficult to Remove; Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE PTA BALLOON ALLEGEDLY LEAKED LIQUID DURING THE INFLATION. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON WAS ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED. FURTHERMORE, IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THERE WAS AN ALLEGED RESISTANCE FELT WHEN RETRACTING THE BALLOON THROUGH THE INTRODUCER SHEATH FOLLOWING THE BALLOON RUPTURE AND WERE RETRIEVED AS ONE UNIT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18167854 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 20, 2023Difficult to Remove; Material Rupture; Difficult to Remove; Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE PTA BALLOON ALLEGEDLY LEAKED LIQUID DURING THE INFLATION. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON WAS ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED. FURTHERMORE, IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THERE WAS AN ALLEGED RESISTANCE FELT WHEN RETRACTING THE BALLOON THROUGH THE INTRODUCER SHEATH FOLLOWING THE BALLOON RUPTURE BUT WERE RETRIEVED AS ONE UNIT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18167822 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 18, 2023Difficult to Remove; Material Rupture; Difficult to Remove; Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE PTA BALLOON ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED DURING DILATION. FURTHER IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON FELT RESISTANCE WHEN RETRIEVING THROUGH THE SHEATH BUT WAS REMOVED AS ONE UNIT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER BALLOON. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17954834 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 12, 2023Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE PTA BALLOON WAS ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17920923 ↗

Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices

All Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page