Conquest® 40 CQF75108Recalls & reported problems
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · Conquest® 40 PTA Dilatation Catheter 10 mm x 80 mm, 75 cm catheter · Class 2
All models of Conquest 40 (25)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741060649), received between Jan 22, 2018 and Sep 28, 2026 — classified as 9 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Deformation” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Deformation4
- Material Rupture4
- Difficult to Remove3
- Inflation Problem2
- Break1
- Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material1
- Entrapment of Device1
- Material Frayed1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 28, 2026Material Rupture
On (b)(6) 2026, a patient underwent an angioplasty procedure using a Conquest 40 PTA balloon. During the procedure, the balloon was successfully inflated to dilate a stent. After deflation and withdrawal for repositioning to another treatment site, the physician attempted to reinflate the balloon but observed that it would not maintain pressure. There was no reported patient injury.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50911163 ↗MalfunctionOct 8, 2025Difficult to Remove; Material Deformation; Difficult to Remove; Material Deformation
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE USING THE CONQUEST 40 PTA BALLOON. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON ALLEGEDLY INVERTED ALONG THE PROXIMAL SEGMENT. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT IT COULD NOT BE REMOVED FROM THE SHEATH. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23244009 ↗MalfunctionJul 8, 2025Difficult to Remove; Material Deformation; Difficult to Remove; Material Deformation
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) PROCEDURE USING THE CONQUEST 40 PTA BALLOON CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON MUSHROOMED ON THE DISTAL END AND WAS DIFFICULT TO REMOVE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT MANEUVERED THE BALLOON SEVERAL WAYS IN ORDER TO EVENTUALLY REMOVE IT AND RESULTED IN CASE BEING DELAYED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22434867 ↗MalfunctionJun 10, 2025Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) PROCEDURE USING THE CONQUEST 40 PTA BALLOON CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN PULLING BACK THE BALLOON RESISTANCE WAS FELT SO IT WAS PULLED WITH MORE FORCE AND BALLOON WAS UNSHEATHED AND STUCK AT THE END OF THE G-TUBE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT G-TUBE AND BALLOON REMOVED FROM PATIENT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22174889 ↗MalfunctionJul 9, 2021Inflation Problem; Material Rupture; Material Deformation; Inflation Problem; Material Rupture; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED DURING A TREATMENT OF STENOSIS IN THE SUPERIOR VENA CAVA JUST BEYOND THE CEPHALIC ARCH, THE BALLOON ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED AT 20 ATM. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12142599 ↗MalfunctionJul 9, 2021Material Rupture; Material Deformation; Material Rupture; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TREATMENT OF STENOSIS IN THE SUPERIOR VENA CAVA JUST BEYOND THE CEPHALIC ARCH, THE BALLOON ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON ALLEGEDLY DEFORMED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12142595 ↗MalfunctionJul 24, 2019Entrapment of Device; Inflation Problem; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Entrapment of Device; Inflation Problem; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material
THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES ONE MALFUNCTION. A REVIEW OF THE REPORTED INFORMATION INDICATED THAT MODEL CQF75108 PTA DILATATION CATHETER ALLEGEDLY EXPERIENCED ENTRAPMENT OF THE DEVICE, INFLATION ISSUES, RETRACTION PROBLEMS, MATERIAL RUPTURE, FAILURE TO ADVANCE AND FOREIGN MATERIAL. THIS INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM ONE SOURCE. ONE PATIENT WAS INVOLVED WITH NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES. THE PATIENT WAS A 71-YEAR-OLD FEMALE WHO WEIGHED 166 POUNDS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8823498 ↗MalfunctionJul 16, 2019Break; Material Puncture/Hole; Retraction Problem; Break; Material Puncture/Hole; Retraction Problem
THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES ONE MALFUNCTION. A REVIEW OF THE REPORTED INFORMATION INDICATED THAT MODEL CQF75108 PTA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER ALLEGEDLY EXPERIENCED A BREAK, MATERIAL PUNCTURE, AND A RETRACTION PROBLEM. THIS INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A SINGLE SOURCE. THE MALFUNCTION INVOLVED A PATIENT WITH NO REPORTED CONSEQUENCE. THE PATIENT¿S AGE, WEIGHT, AND SEX WERE NOT PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8796346 ↗MalfunctionJan 22, 2018Material Frayed; Material Rupture; Material Frayed; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE PTA BALLOON ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED AT 20 ATM. THE PTA BALLOON WAS EXCHANGED OVER THE GUIDEWIRE FOR ANOTHER THAT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7211383 ↗
Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices
- Coyote™ ES H74939135152010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal879 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135204010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal585 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135202010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal437 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135304010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal384 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135404010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal293 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939134152010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal279 reports
- Coyote™ H74939185202210Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal200 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135254010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal127 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page