Skip to content

MAGNUM MN1820Recalls & reported problems

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · MAGNUM® Disposable Core Tissue Biopsy Needle, 18g x 20cm · Class 2

All models of MAGNUM (19)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Quick summary

This Bard Magnum biopsy needle is a disposable core tissue biopsy needle used to take tissue samples, including prostate biopsies. The 38 reports mostly describe broken, bent or twisted needles, needles that were hard to remove, and packaging or contamination concerns; 19 reports describe injuries and none describe a death. Reports rose from 4 in the earlier 12-month period to 17 in the most recent one. One open recall, started in August 2024, concerns packaging dents and cuts from manufacturing that may compromise the sterile barrier.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
37
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
19
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 37 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741084355), received between Jun 14, 2018 and May 11, 2026 — classified as 19 injuries, 18 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (7 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 2 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 15 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports20242025202615
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Aug 2, 2024Open, Classified

    Due to possible packaging damage (indentations/cuts) cause by manufacturing process. As a result of the packaging damage, may cause the sterile barrier to be compromised.

    Z-3206-2024 · Root cause: Packaging change control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem18
  • Break7
  • Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material5
  • Difficult to Remove4
  • Material Twisted/Bent4
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1
  • Packaging Problem1

Patient problems

  • Sepsis15
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions12
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient5
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available2
  • Needle Stick/Puncture1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • No Patient Involvement1

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 37 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 11, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BIOPSY PROCEDURE USING THE MAGNUM NEEDLES FOR TRANSPERINEAL PROSTATE BIOPSIES CONDUCTED IN THE OPERATING ROOM. POST PROCEDURE THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED UROSEPSIS. THE PHYSICIAN CONCLUDED THAT THE UROSEPSIS MAY BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF MAGNUM NEEDLES, NOTING THAT THE BIOPSY GUN WAS STERILIZED AFTER EACH PROCEDURE AND THAT NEEDLES FROM DIFFERENT BATCHES WERE USED. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Sepsis

    MAUDE report 25134353 ↗
  • InjuryMay 11, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BIOPSY PROCEDURE USING THE MAGNUM NEEDLES FOR TRANSPERINEAL PROSTATE BIOPSIES CONDUCTED IN THE OPERATING ROOM. POST PROCEDURE THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED UROSEPSIS. THE PHYSICIAN CONCLUDED THAT THE UROSEPSIS MAY BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF MAGNUM NEEDLES, NOTING THAT THE BIOPSY GUN WAS STERILIZED AFTER EACH PROCEDURE AND THAT NEEDLES FROM DIFFERENT BATCHES WERE USED. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Sepsis

    MAUDE report 25134352 ↗
  • InjuryMay 11, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BIOPSY PROCEDURE USING THE MAGNUM NEEDLES FOR TRANSPERINEAL PROSTATE BIOPSIES CONDUCTED IN THE OPERATING ROOM. POST PROCEDURE THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED UROSEPSIS. THE PHYSICIAN CONCLUDED THAT THE UROSEPSIS MAY BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF MAGNUM NEEDLES, NOTING THAT THE BIOPSY GUN WAS STERILIZED AFTER EACH PROCEDURE AND THAT NEEDLES FROM DIFFERENT BATCHES WERE USED. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Sepsis

    MAUDE report 25134350 ↗
  • InjuryMay 11, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BIOPSY PROCEDURE USING THE MAGNUM NEEDLES FOR TRANSPERINEAL PROSTATE BIOPSIES CONDUCTED IN THE OPERATING ROOM. POST PROCEDURE THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED UROSEPSIS. THE PHYSICIAN CONCLUDED THAT THE UROSEPSIS MAY BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF MAGNUM NEEDLES, NOTING THAT THE BIOPSY GUN WAS STERILIZED AFTER EACH PROCEDURE AND THAT NEEDLES FROM DIFFERENT BATCHES WERE USED. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Sepsis

    MAUDE report 25134347 ↗
  • InjuryMay 11, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BIOPSY PROCEDURE USING THE MAGNUM NEEDLES FOR TRANSPERINEAL PROSTATE BIOPSIES CONDUCTED IN THE OPERATING ROOM. POST PROCEDURE THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED UROSEPSIS. THE PHYSICIAN CONCLUDED THAT THE UROSEPSIS MAY BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF MAGNUM NEEDLES, NOTING THAT THE BIOPSY GUN WAS STERILIZED AFTER EACH PROCEDURE AND THAT NEEDLES FROM DIFFERENT BATCHES WERE USED. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Sepsis

    MAUDE report 25134346 ↗
  • InjuryMay 11, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BIOPSY PROCEDURE USING THE MAGNUM NEEDLES FOR TRANSPERINEAL PROSTATE BIOPSIES CONDUCTED IN THE OPERATING ROOM. POST PROCEDURE THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED UROSEPSIS. THE PHYSICIAN CONCLUDED THAT THE UROSEPSIS MAY BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF MAGNUM NEEDLES, NOTING THAT THE BIOPSY GUN WAS STERILIZED AFTER EACH PROCEDURE AND THAT NEEDLES FROM DIFFERENT BATCHES WERE USED. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Sepsis

    MAUDE report 25134345 ↗
  • InjuryMay 11, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BIOPSY PROCEDURE USING THE MAGNUM NEEDLES FOR TRANSPERINEAL PROSTATE BIOPSIES CONDUCTED IN THE OPERATING ROOM. POST PROCEDURE THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED UROSEPSIS. THE PHYSICIAN CONCLUDED THAT THE UROSEPSIS MAY BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF MAGNUM NEEDLES, NOTING THAT THE BIOPSY GUN WAS STERILIZED AFTER EACH PROCEDURE AND THAT NEEDLES FROM DIFFERENT BATCHES WERE USED. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Sepsis

    MAUDE report 25134344 ↗
  • InjuryMay 11, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BIOPSY PROCEDURE USING THE MAGNUM NEEDLES FOR TRANSPERINEAL PROSTATE BIOPSIES CONDUCTED IN THE OPERATING ROOM. POST PROCEDURE THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED UROSEPSIS. THE PHYSICIAN CONCLUDED THAT THE UROSEPSIS MAY BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF MAGNUM NEEDLES, NOTING THAT THE BIOPSY GUN WAS STERILIZED AFTER EACH PROCEDURE AND THAT NEEDLES FROM DIFFERENT BATCHES WERE USED. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Sepsis

    MAUDE report 25134343 ↗
  • InjuryMay 11, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BIOPSY PROCEDURE USING THE MAGNUM NEEDLES FOR TRANSPERINEAL PROSTATE BIOPSIES CONDUCTED IN THE OPERATING ROOM. POST PROCEDURE THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED UROSEPSIS. THE PHYSICIAN CONCLUDED THAT THE UROSEPSIS MAY BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF MAGNUM NEEDLES, NOTING THAT THE BIOPSY GUN WAS STERILIZED AFTER EACH PROCEDURE AND THAT NEEDLES FROM DIFFERENT BATCHES WERE USED. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Sepsis

    MAUDE report 25134342 ↗
  • InjuryMay 11, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BIOPSY PROCEDURE USING THE MAGNUM NEEDLES FOR TRANSPERINEAL PROSTATE BIOPSIES CONDUCTED IN THE OPERATING ROOM. POST PROCEDURE THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED UROSEPSIS. THE PHYSICIAN CONCLUDED THAT THE UROSEPSIS MAY BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF MAGNUM NEEDLES, NOTING THAT THE BIOPSY GUN WAS STERILIZED AFTER EACH PROCEDURE AND THAT NEEDLES FROM DIFFERENT BATCHES WERE USED. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Sepsis

    MAUDE report 25134341 ↗
  • InjuryMay 11, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BIOPSY PROCEDURE USING THE MAGNUM NEEDLES FOR TRANSPERINEAL PROSTATE BIOPSIES CONDUCTED IN THE OPERATING ROOM. POST PROCEDURE THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED UROSEPSIS. THE PHYSICIAN CONCLUDED THAT THE UROSEPSIS MAY BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF MAGNUM NEEDLES, NOTING THAT THE BIOPSY GUN WAS STERILIZED AFTER EACH PROCEDURE AND THAT NEEDLES FROM DIFFERENT BATCHES WERE USED. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Sepsis

    MAUDE report 25134340 ↗
  • InjuryMay 11, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BIOPSY PROCEDURE USING THE MAGNUM NEEDLES FOR TRANSPERINEAL PROSTATE BIOPSIES CONDUCTED IN THE OPERATING ROOM. POST PROCEDURE THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED UROSEPSIS. THE PHYSICIAN CONCLUDED THAT THE UROSEPSIS MAY BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF MAGNUM NEEDLES, NOTING THAT THE BIOPSY GUN WAS STERILIZED AFTER EACH PROCEDURE AND THAT NEEDLES FROM DIFFERENT BATCHES WERE USED. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Sepsis

    MAUDE report 25134339 ↗
  • InjuryMay 11, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BIOPSY PROCEDURE USING THE MAGNUM NEEDLES FOR TRANSPERINEAL PROSTATE BIOPSIES CONDUCTED IN THE OPERATING ROOM. POST PROCEDURE THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED UROSEPSIS. THE PHYSICIAN CONCLUDED THAT THE UROSEPSIS MAY BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF MAGNUM NEEDLES, NOTING THAT THE BIOPSY GUN WAS STERILIZED AFTER EACH PROCEDURE AND THAT NEEDLES FROM DIFFERENT BATCHES WERE USED. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Sepsis

    MAUDE report 25134337 ↗
  • InjuryMay 11, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BIOPSY PROCEDURE USING THE MAGNUM NEEDLES FOR TRANSPERINEAL PROSTATE BIOPSIES CONDUCTED IN THE OPERATING ROOM. POST PROCEDURE THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED UROSEPSIS. THE PHYSICIAN CONCLUDED THAT THE UROSEPSIS MAY BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF MAGNUM NEEDLES, NOTING THAT THE BIOPSY GUN WAS STERILIZED AFTER EACH PROCEDURE AND THAT NEEDLES FROM DIFFERENT BATCHES WERE USED. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Sepsis

    MAUDE report 25134335 ↗
  • InjuryMay 11, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BIOPSY PROCEDURE USING THE MAGNUM NEEDLES FOR TRANSPERINEAL PROSTATE BIOPSIES CONDUCTED IN THE OPERATING ROOM. POST PROCEDURE THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED UROSEPSIS. THE PHYSICIAN CONCLUDED THAT THE UROSEPSIS MAY BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF MAGNUM NEEDLES, NOTING THAT THE BIOPSY GUN WAS STERILIZED AFTER EACH PROCEDURE AND THAT NEEDLES FROM DIFFERENT BATCHES WERE USED. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Sepsis

    MAUDE report 25134334 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 7, 2026Break

    A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BIOPSY PROCEDURE USING MAGNUM DEVICE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE ALLEGEDLY BROKEN. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24797870 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 8, 2025Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material

    ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT PREPARED FOR A BIOPSY PROCEDURE USING THE MAGNUM NEEDLE. PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS SMALL AMOUNT OF DIRT DISCOVERED IN THE NEEDLE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23241963 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 4, 2025Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A BIOPSY PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE ALLEGEDLY BROKEN. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21771019 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 4, 2025Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A BIOPSY PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE ALLEGEDLY BROKEN. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21771016 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 26, 2024Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING BIOPSY PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE ALLEGEDLY BROKEN. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21016702 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 16, 2024Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROSTATE BIOPSY PROCEDURE, THE FOURTH NEEDLE ALLEGEDLY BEING TAKEN OUT WHILE THE DEVICE STOPPED WORKING. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT WHEN THE NEEDLE WAS REMOVED, THE PINK PART WAS ALLEGEDLY DAMAGED. FURTHERMORE, THE STYLET ALLEGEDLY DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20468128 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 2, 2024Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO AN ULTRASOUND GUIDED LIVER BIOPSY PROCEDURE THROUGH NORMAL DENSITY TISSUE, THE DEVICE WAS ALLEGEDLY CONTAMINATED WITH FOREIGN BODIES IN THE PACKAGE. NO COAXIAL WAS USED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19657009 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 24, 2023Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ULTRASOUND GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY PROCEDURE, A FOREIGN MATERIAL WAS ALLEGEDLY FOUND ON THE NEEDLE NOTCH OF THE DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17377042 ↗
  • InjuryMay 16, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROSTATE BIOPSY PROCEDURE THROUGH NORMAL DENSITY TISSUE, THE PATIENT ALLEGEDLY EXPERIENCED BLEEDING. A COAXIAL WAS NOT USED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. RIGHT AFTER THE BIOPSY, A RECTORRHAGIA OCCURRED THAT DID NOT SUBSIDE AND REQUIRED THE PERFORMANCE OF A RECTOSCOPY, IN WHICH A HEMOSTATIC INJECTION OF SIX CC OF ADRENALINE WAS GIVEN AND FOUR CLIPS WERE PLACED TO CONTROL THE BLEEDING. THE PATIENT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY DISCHARGED AFTER TWENTY-FOUR HOURS OF OBSERVATION.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 16939203 ↗
  • InjuryMay 16, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROSTATE BIOPSY PROCEDURE THROUGH NORMAL DENSITY TISSUE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED BLEEDING. A COAXIAL NEEDLE WAS NOT USED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. DURING THE BIOPSY, A PROFUSE RECTORRHAGIA WAS UNABLE TO BE CONTROLLED WITH A FEW MINUTES OF COMPRESSION OF THE PROSTATE WITH THE TRANSDUCER, INTERRUPTING THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT IN STABLE CONDITION BUT WITH ACTIVE BLEEDING IN THE ANAL AREA. URGENT RECTOSCOPY WAS PERFORMED IN WHICH SEVERAL PUNCTATE LESIONS WERE VISUALIZED CORRESPONDING TO THE PUNCTURE SITES, ONE WITH A CLOT. TWO CLIPS WERE PLACED THERE. THE PATIENT WAS KEPT UNDER OBSERVATION IN STABLE CONDITION. NO NEW RECTAL BLEEDING APPEARED THUS THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED AFTER 24 HOURS.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 16939198 ↗

Other Biopsy needle devices

All Biopsy needle devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page