Ultraverse® 035 PTA Dilatation Catheter U35130515Recalls & reported problems
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · Ultraverse 035 PTA Dilatation Catheter 5.0mm x 150mm balloon, 130cm shaft · Class 2
All models of Ultraverse 035 PTA Dilatation Catheter (92)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741092725), received between Apr 15, 2019 and Jan 28, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device-Device Incompatibility” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device-Device Incompatibility2
- Difficult to Remove2
- Material Rupture2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Difficult to Insert1
- Packaging Problem1
- Stretched1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- No Patient Involvement1
- Vascular Dissection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJan 28, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE RESULTS OF THE CLINICAL TRIAL OF A NON-COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE DEVICE, BD LOW PROFILE VASCULAR COVERED STENT (LPVCS). THE SUBJECT UNDERWENT TARGET LESION INTERVENTION ON THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY IN THE LEFT LIMB USING A COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE ULTRAVERSE BALLOON WHEN AN ADVERSE EVENT OF VESSEL DISSECTION OCCURRED. THE SEVERITY AND ADVERSE EVENT RELATIVITY WITH THE DEVICE OR PROCEDURE WERE NOT REPORTED. THE LESION WAS STENTED.
Patient problems: Vascular Dissection
MAUDE report 24197606 ↗MalfunctionApr 10, 2025Difficult to Remove; Stretched; Device-Device Incompatibility; Difficult to Remove; Stretched; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE PTA BALLOON WAS ALLEGEDLY DIFFICULT TO REMOVE OVER THE WIRE AND THEN THROUGH THE SHEATH. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT IT WAS INFLATED AND THEN DEFLATED COMPLETELY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21812149 ↗MalfunctionDec 12, 2024Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON WAS ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED DURING THE FIRST EXPANSION. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20911649 ↗MalfunctionOct 18, 2022Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Remove; Device-Device Incompatibility; Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Remove; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY IN THE DISTAL SFA, THE BALLOON ALLEGEDLY HAD DIFFICULTY IN INTRODUCING TO THE SHEATH . IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE WAS DIFFICULT TO REMOVE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15621955 ↗MalfunctionOct 21, 2020Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE PTA BALLOON WAS ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10712010 ↗MalfunctionApr 15, 2019Packaging Problem; Packaging Problem
THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES ONE MALFUNCTION. A REVIEW OF THE REPORTED INFORMATION INDICATED THAT MODEL U5130515 PTA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER ALLEGEDLY HAD A PACKAGING ISSUE. THIS REPORT WAS RECEIVED FROM ONE SOURCE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT CONTACT WITH THE DEVICE AND PATIENT INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 8516616 ↗
Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices
- Coyote™ ES H74939135152010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal879 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135204010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal585 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135202010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal437 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135304010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal384 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135404010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal293 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939134152010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal279 reports
- Coyote™ H74939185202210Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal200 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135254010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal127 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page