Ultraverse® 035 PTA Dilatation Catheter U3575610Recalls & reported problems
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · Ultraverse 035 PTA Dilatation Catheter 6.0mm x 100mm balloon, 75cm shaft · Class 2
All models of Ultraverse 035 PTA Dilatation Catheter (92)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741092985), received between Jun 12, 2018 and Jul 15, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Rupture4
- Deflation Problem1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Device-Device Incompatibility1
- Difficult to Insert1
- Difficult to Remove1
- Failure to Advance1
- Material Deformation1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient4
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Injury1
- Needle Stick/Puncture1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 15, 2024Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE PTA BALLOON ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED AT 6 ATM. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19747139 ↗MalfunctionJul 2, 2021Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Remove; Device-Device Incompatibility; Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Remove; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE PTA BALLOON WAS ALLEGEDLY HAD DIFFICULTY IN RETRACTING THE BALLOON THROUGH THE INTRODUCER SHEATH. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12105734 ↗MalfunctionJul 21, 2020Material Rupture; Material Rupture
THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES ONE MALFUNCTION. A REVIEW OF THE REPORTED INFORMATION INDICATED THAT THE MODEL U3575610 PTA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED. THIS INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM ONE SOURCE. THE MALFUNCTION INVOLVED PATIENT WITH NO KNOWN IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT WAS A FEMALE; HOWEVER, THE AGE AND WEIGHT WAS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10306188 ↗MalfunctionApr 20, 2020Material Rupture; Material Rupture
THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES ONE MALFUNCTION. A REVIEW OF THE REPORTED INFORMATION INDICATED THAT MODEL U3575610 PTA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER ALLEGEDLY EXPERIENCED MATERIAL RUPTURE THIS INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM ONE SOURCE. THIS MALFUNCTION INVOLVED ONE PATIENT WITH NO CONSEQUENCES. THE WEIGHT OF (B)(6) MALE PATIENT IS (B)(6).
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9977603 ↗InjuryAug 29, 2019Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE IN THE LEFT POPLITEAL ARTERY, THE PTA BALLOON WAS ALLEGEDLY UNABLE TO CROSS THE LESION. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED AND AN ATHERECTOMY WAS PERFORMED TO REMOVE THE CALCIFICATION.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 8946550 ↗InjuryDec 13, 2018Deflation Problem; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Deflation Problem; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE IN THE LEFT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, THE PTA BALLOON ALLEGEDLY HAD ISSUES DEFLATING. A NEEDLE STICK WAS USED TO PUNCTURE AND DEFLATION THE DEVICE. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: Needle Stick/Puncture; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8162737 ↗MalfunctionJun 12, 2018Retraction Problem; Material Rupture; Material Deformation; Retraction Problem; Material Rupture; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE PTA BALLOON ALLEGEDLY HAD DIFFICULTY BEING RETRACTED THROUGH THE SHEATH. THE MALFUNCTIONED DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH THE USE OF ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7592347 ↗
Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices
- Coyote™ ES H74939135152010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal879 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135204010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal585 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135202010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal437 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135304010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal384 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135404010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal293 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939134152010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal279 reports
- Coyote™ H74939185202210Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal200 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135254010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal127 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page