Skip to content

Ultraverse® 035 PTA Dilatation Catheter U3575104Recalls & reported problems

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · Ultraverse 035 PTA Dilatation Catheter 10.0mm x 40mm balloon, 75cm shaft · Class 2

All models of Ultraverse 035 PTA Dilatation Catheter (92)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
14
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 14 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741094583), received between Nov 16, 2016 and Jun 9, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 12 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (6 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Rupture6
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component4
  • Device-Device Incompatibility3
  • Difficult to Insert3
  • Difficult to Remove3
  • Retraction Problem2
  • Burst Container or Vessel1
  • Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions8
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • No Patient Involvement2
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 14 most recent of 14 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 9, 2025Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) PROCEDURE USING THE ULTRAVERSE 035 PTA BALLOON CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON WAS ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED AT 8 ATM. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22165366 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 2, 2025Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE ULTRAVERSE 035 PTA BALLOON WAS ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED AT 4 ATM. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21949179 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 10, 2024Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE PTA BALLOON ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19708107 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 10, 2023Burst Container or Vessel; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Burst Container or Vessel; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE CATHETER SHAFT ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17285058 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 6, 2022Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Remove; Device-Device Incompatibility; Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Remove; Device-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE IN THE RIGHT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY, THE PTA BALLOON ALLEGEDLY UNABLE TO BE ADVANCED AND DIFFICULT TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SHEATH. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED ALONG WITH THE SHEATH. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15550103 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 9, 2021Difficult to Remove; Material Separation; Device-Device Incompatibility; Difficult to Advance; Difficult to Remove; Material Separation; Device-Device Incompatibility; Difficult to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE PTA BALLOON ALLEGEDLY WOULD NOT FIT THROUGH A SHEATH. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12967141 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 8, 2021Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Remove; Device-Device Incompatibility; Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Remove; Device-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE IN THE COMMON ILIAC ARTERY VIA IPSILATERAL RETROGRADE APPROACH, THE PTA BALLOON WAS ALLEGEDLY UNABLE TO INSERT THROUGH THE SHEATH. THEREFORE NEGATIVE PRESSURE WAS APPLIED AND THE DEVICE WAS INSERTED SLOWLY . IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE WAS ALLEGEDLY STUCK INSIDE THE SHEATH AND THE BALLOON AND SHEATH WERE REMOVED AS ONE UNIT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12292196 ↗
  • InjuryAug 4, 2021Material Rupture; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Material Rupture; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT POST ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE TO TREAT A VERY TIGHT STENOSIS IN THE AXILLARY VEIN, THE BALLOON ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED AND TORE APART DURING REMOVAL OF DEVICE FROM THE PATIENT. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT EVEN AFTER MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS TO RECOVER THE TORN DEVICE, A SMALL PIECE OF THE BALLOON WAS LEFT BEHIND AND WAS UNRECOVERABLE. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE IN A STABLE CONDITION.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 12273440 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 24, 2021Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING STENOSIS IN THE CEPHALIC VEIN, THE PTA BALLOON ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED AT 5ATM. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT ANOTHER BALLOON WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11559263 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 19, 2017Retraction Problem; Retraction Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE THE PTA BALLOON ALLEGEDLY GOT STUCK INSIDE THE 6FR SHEATH UPON REMOVAL FROM THE PATIENT. THE HEALTH CARE PROVIDER REMOVED THE SHEATH AND BALLOON TOGETHER AS ONE UNIT AND USED A NEW SHEATH AND BALLOON TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE ASYMPTOMATIC AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 6652558 ↗
  • InjuryMay 4, 2017Retraction Problem; Material Rupture; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Retraction Problem; Material Rupture; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING POST-DILATATION OF A BARE METAL STENT PLACED IN THE CEPHALIC ARCH, THE PTA BALLOON ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED (ATM UNKNOWN) DURING THE FIRST INFLATION. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT A MAJORITY OF THE BALLOON DETACHED AND REMAINED WITHIN THE STENT AND THE BALLOON CATHETER WAS DIFFICULT TO RETRACT THROUGH THE STENT AND THE SHEATH. REPORTEDLY, A STENT GRAFT WAS DEPLOYED TO APPOSE THE DETACHED BALLOON SEGMENT AGAINST THE STENT AND VESSEL WALL. ANOTHER BALLOON CATHETER WAS EXCHANGED OVER THE GUIDEWIRE AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6546071 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 4, 2017Difficult to Insert; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Difficult to Insert; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE PTA BALLOON WAS ALLEGEDLY DIFFICULT TO INSERT THROUGH THE INTRODUCER SHEATH. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT AN ALLEGED KINK WAS IDENTIFIED. THE PTA BALLOON WAS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 6378664 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 9, 2017Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PREPARATION FOR AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE THE STERILE PACKAGING ALLEGEDLY CONTAINED A PARTICLE INSIDE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT CONTACT.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 6314084 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 16, 2016Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE PTA BALLOON ALLEGEDLY DETACHED AT THE STRAIN RELIEF. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 6107669 ↗

Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices

All Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page