MISSION 1810MSKRecalls & reported problems
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · Mission Disposable Core Biopsy Instrument Kit - 18Gx10cm · Class 2
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 11
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741097058), received between Oct 23, 2017 and Jan 2, 2026 — classified as 11 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (4 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Nov 8, 2023Open, Classified
The internal diameter of the coaxial cannula may be smaller or larger than the external diameter of the biopsy needle, and the length of the cannula may exceed the stated length on the label. As a result, the biopsy needle may not fit properly into the coaxial cannula, preventing access to the target tissue, which could lead to tissue injury, longer and repeat procedures.
Z-0643-2024 · Root cause: Process control · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component4
- Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material2
- Device Markings/Labelling Problem2
- Unsealed Device Packaging2
- Bent1
- Break1
- Defective Component1
- Material Twisted/Bent1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions10
- Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1
Recent adverse event reports
The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 2, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY GUIDED LUNG BIOPSY PROCEDURE THROUGH NORMAL TISSUE DENSITY BY USING MISSION KIT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE THE BLUNT TROCAR ALLEGEDLY SEPARATED FROM THE NEEDLE HUB. THE COAXIAL NEEDLE WAS USED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23942574 ↗MalfunctionSep 2, 2025Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BIOPSY PROCEDURE, USING THE MISSION NEEDLE KIT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE COAXIAL HUB IN THE KIT WAS BROKEN. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22935667 ↗MalfunctionDec 27, 2024Unsealed Device Packaging; Unsealed Device Packaging
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO A BIOPSY PROCEDURE, THE SEAL WAS ALLEGEDLY OPEN AT THE ONE SIDE/ BOTTOM SIDE OF NEEDLE PACK. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21025794 ↗MalfunctionNov 1, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO AN ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BIOPSY PROCEDURE, THE TROCAR NEEDLE WAS ALLEGEDLY LOOSE FROM THE PLASTIC HUB. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE TROCAR NEEDLE WAS ALLEGEDLY BROKEN OFF FROM PLASTIC AFTER UNPACK. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20586500 ↗MalfunctionOct 7, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A BIOPSY PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE ALLEGEDLY DETACHED FROM THE HUB RENDERING IT UNUSABLE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20382374 ↗MalfunctionJun 9, 2023Unsealed Device Packaging; Unsealed Device Packaging
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PREPARATION FOR A BIOPSY PROCEDURE, THE PACKAGE WAS ALLEGEDLY FOUND TO BE OPENED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17097077 ↗MalfunctionApr 8, 2021Device Markings/Labelling Problem; Device Markings/Labelling Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A BIOPSY PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE NEEDLE WAS ALLEGEDLY BLUNT. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE NEEDLE WAS ALLEGEDLY LONGER THAN THE ACTUAL NEEDLE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11638281 ↗MalfunctionApr 8, 2021Device Markings/Labelling Problem; Device Markings/Labelling Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO A BIOPSY PROCEDURE, THE PACKAGE CAME WITH A BLUNT TIP STYLET THAT WAS MUCH LONGER THAN THE INTRODUCER AND NEEDLE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11637878 ↗MalfunctionMar 25, 2021Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A BIOPSY PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE ALLEGEDLY FOUND FOREIGN MATERIAL. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT CONTACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11567014 ↗MalfunctionNov 26, 2020Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Material Twisted/Bent; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Material Twisted/Bent
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BIOPSY, THROUGH SOFT TISSUE, THE DEVICE NEEDLE ALLEGEDLY BENT. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT DURING EVALUATION FOREIGN MATERIAL WAS FOUND IN THE NEEDLE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10911114 ↗MalfunctionOct 23, 2017Bent; Defective Component
DURING CT GUIDED LIVER BIOPSY THE BARD BIOPSY NEEDLE WAS INSIDE THE PATIENT AND BENT WHILE IN THE COAXIAL INTRODUCER. NEEDLE WAS REMOVED AND NEW BARD BIOPSY NEEDLE WAS USED WITHOUT INCIDENT. THE PROVIDER INSISTS THERE WAS NO EXCESSIVE FORCE WITH NEEDLE WAS BEING USED, AND THAT THIS WAS A DEFECTIVE PRODUCT. THE RESULT OF PREVIOUS BENT NEEDLE REQUIRED THE PATIENT'S LIVER HAD TO BE RE-BIOPSIED CREATING A HIGHER POTENTIAL RISK FOR BLEEDING POST LIVER BIOPSY PROCEDURE. MANUFACTURER RESPONSE FOR INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY, BARD® MISSION® (PER SITE REPORTER): CR BARD REP WAS GIVEN THE BENT NEEDLE.
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding
MAUDE report 6968080 ↗
Other INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY devices
- MAX-CORE MC1616Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY1 recall4,258 reports
- ENCOR® ECP017GSenorx, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY1 recall4,186 reports
- MAX-CORE MC1820Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY1 recall2,404 reports
- MAX-CORE MC1816Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY1 recall1 death848 reports
- MAX-CORE MC1410Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY1 recall399 reports
- MAX-CORE MC1610Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY1 recall394 reports
- ENCOR® ECP0110GVSenorx, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY392 reports
- ENCOR® ECP0110GSenorx, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY390 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.