Skip to content

TRUE FLOW TF0223512Recalls & reported problems

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · TRUE™ FLOW Valvuloplasty Perfusion Catheter, 22 mm x 3.5 cm, 110 cm catheter · Class 2

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741097669), received between Feb 9, 2017 and Apr 22, 2025 — classified as 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Peeled/Delaminated” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Peeled/Delaminated2
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Difficult to Insert1
  • Flushing Problem1
  • Inflation Problem1
  • Leak/Splash1
  • Material Deformation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • No Patient Involvement2

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 22, 2025Leak/Splash; Leak/Splash

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING TO A VALVULOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE PTA BALLOON ALLEGEDLY DID NOT INFLATE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE CONTRAST COMING THROUGH THE SHAFT BUT DID NOT GO THROUGH THE BACK OF THE BALLOON SHAFT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21884727 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 1, 2021Flushing Problem; Inflation Problem; Material Puncture/Hole; Flushing Problem; Inflation Problem; Material Puncture/Hole

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO THE TREATMENT THE CATHETER ALLEGEDLY HAD A HOLE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON ALLEGEDLY FAILED TO FLUSH. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11600654 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 15, 2019Difficult to Insert; Peeled/Delaminated; Difficult to Insert; Peeled/Delaminated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A BALLOON AORTIC VALVULOPLASTY, THE BALLOON ALLEGEDLY HAD DIFFICULTY BEING INSERTED THROUGH THE SHEATH. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO PERFORM THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 8249445 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 28, 2018Material Deformation; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT UPON REMOVAL FROM THE PACKAGING, A KINK WAS OBSERVED ON THE CATHETER OF THE PTV BALLOON. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO PERFORM THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 8113502 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 9, 2018Peeled/Delaminated; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Unintended Movement; Peeled/Delaminated; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Unintended Movement

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TAVR PROCEDURE THE OUTER FIBER SHELL OF THE BALLOON ALLEGEDLY BEGAN TO PARTIALLY PEEL OFF DURING RETRACTION THROUGH THE SHEATH. THE BALLOON WAS ABLE TO BE SUCCESSFULLY RETRACTED THROUGH THE SHEATH. ANOTHER BALLOON WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7409963 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 9, 2017Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN AORTIC VALVULOPLASTY, THE X-RAY MARKERS ON THE BALLOON WERE ALLEGEDLY NOT VISIBLE WHILE ATTEMPTING TO POSITION THE BALLOON. REPORTEDLY, THE BALLOON WAS SUCCESSFULLY RETRACTED OUT OF THE PATIENT AND THE HEALTH CARE PROVIDER CHECKED FOR MARKERS BUT NO MARKERS WERE VISIBLE. ANOTHER BALLOON WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 6314082 ↗

Other Balloon aortic valvuloplasty devices

All Balloon aortic valvuloplasty devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.