Skip to content

OPTIFIX 0113315Recalls & reported problems

Davol Inc. · OptiFix AT Absorbable Fixation System with Articulating Technology, 37 cm length, 5 mm diameter, 15 Fasteners · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741136559), received between Oct 29, 2020 and Mar 5, 2025 — classified as 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Form Staple” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Form Staple3
  • Break1
  • Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material1
  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 5, 2025Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    AS REPORTED, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC VENTRAL HERNIA REPAIR, OPTIFIX AT FIXATION DEVICE WHICH HAD A LABELED EXPIRATION DATE OF 28-NOV-2024 WAS IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT ON (B)(6) 2025. IT WAS REPORTED THAT NO MALFUNCTION OF THE DEVICE OTHER THAN IT WAS EXPIRED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY, CHANGE IN COURSE OF TREATMENT, OR ANY MEDICAL/SURGICAL INTERVENTION DUE TO THE ISSUE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21525792 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 20, 2022Break; Failure to Form Staple; Break; Failure to Form Staple

    AS REPORTED, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022, THE BARD/DAVOL OPTIFIX AT WAS USED TO FIXATE A BARD MESH INTO THE SOFT TISSUE REGION IN THE STRAIGHT POSITION. AS REPORTED, THE FIRST FASTENER DID NOT FIXATE THE MESH AND THE SECOND FASTENER BROKE. AS REPORTED, THE PROUD/LOOSE FASTENERS WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT BODY AND THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14462316 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 5, 2022Failure to Form Staple; Failure to Form Staple

    AS REPORTED, DURING A PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022, THE BARD/DAVOL OPTIFIX AT FIXATION DEVICE (DEVICE #1) MISFIRED SEVERAL TIMES AND FASTENERS WERE RELEASED SPORADICALLY. AS REPORTED, THE DEVICE WAS NOT USED AND A SECOND OPTIFIX AT (DEVICE #2) WAS OPENED, AND THE SAME ISSUE RECURRED. AS REPORTED, ALL FASTENERS WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT'S BODY AND THERE WAS A PROCEDURAL DELAY IN COMPLETING THE CASE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. NOTE, THIS FILE REPRESENTS DEVICE #1.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14015048 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 1, 2022Failure to Form Staple; Failure to Form Staple

    AS REPORTED, DURING A PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022, THE BARD/DAVOL OPTIFIX AT FIXATION DEVICE (DEVICE #1) MISFIRED SEVERAL TIMES AND FASTENERS WERE RELEASED SPORADICALLY. AS REPORTED, THE DEVICE WAS NOT USED AND A SECOND OPTIFIX AT (DEVICE #2) WAS OPENED, AND THE SAME ISSUE RECURRED. AS REPORTED, ALL FASTENERS WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT'S BODY AND THERE WAS A PROCEDURAL DELAY IN COMPLETING THE CASE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. NOTE, THIS FILE REPRESENTS DEVICE #2.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13977710 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 29, 2020Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material

    AS REPORTED ON (B)(6) 2020, WHEN THE SURGEON OPENED THE PACKAGE OF AN OPTIFIX AT THERE WAS A "HAIR-LIKE" MATERIAL NOTED INSIDE THE STERILE PACKAGE WHICH LOOKED LIKE AN EYELASH PRIOR TO USE ON A PATIENT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY BUT A SHORT DELAY OF FEW MINUTES WHILE RETRIEVING THE NEW DEVICE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10753926 ↗

Other Staple, implantable devices

All Staple, implantable devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.