M6-C 6LLRecalls & reported problems
Spinal Kinetics, Inc. · Artificial Cervical Disc, 6LL (6mm H x 17mm W x 16mm D) · Class 3 · Implant
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Spinal Kinetics M6-C artificial cervical disc is an implant placed between neck vertebrae. Most of the 32 adverse event reports describe bone loss around the implant (osteolysis), mechanical problems such as the disc collapsing or "spinning" out and fraying, and continuing neck pain or swallowing difficulty — several patients needed the disc removed and the level fused with a different implant. No deaths were reported, and all 32 reports involved injuries. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 33
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 33
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 33 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00812388030049), received between Jun 21, 2022 and Sep 23, 2026 — classified as 33 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (22 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Insufficient Device Problem Information22
- Patient Device Interaction Problem5
- Collapse4
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Mechanical Problem3
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
- Compatibility Problem1
- Material Integrity Problem1
Patient problems
- Osteolysis13
- Insufficient Information10
- Pain6
- Dysphagia/ Odynophagia3
- Inadequate Pain Relief3
- Neck Pain3
- Fibrosis2
- Granuloma2
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 33 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 23, 2026Insufficient Device Problem Information
Patient problems: Osteolysis
MAUDE report 50875089 ↗InjuryFeb 11, 2026Mechanical Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED A 44 YEAR OLD FEMAL PATIENT HAD AN M6 CAGE REMOVED AS THEY HAD DEVELOPED OSTEOLYSIS.
Patient problems: Osteolysis
MAUDE report 24315572 ↗InjuryJun 4, 2025Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
ORTHOFIX RECEIVED A NOTIFICATION FROM THE FDA FOR REPORT MW5169519 THAT WAS RECEIVED THROUGH FDA MEDWATCH PROGRAM. THE REPORT DESCRIBES THE PROBLEM AS M6 FAILED IMPLANT. THE IMPLANT WAS "SPINNING" OUT. IMPLANT HAD TO BE SURGICALLY REMOVED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 22145554 ↗InjuryMay 20, 2025Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT C5/6 OSEOMYOLITIS SURGEON CHANGED OUT FOR CAGE AND PLATE TO ACHIEVE FUSION AT SITE. OSTEOMYOLITIS WAS NOTED AT SUPERIOR AND INFERIOR ENDPLATES. INFECTION WAS PRESENT - OBSERVATION OF OSTEOMYELITIS ON PRE OP MRI AND X-RAY (IDENTIFIED BY SURGEON BUT NOT SHARED TO ATTENDING REP, IMPLANT NOT AVAILABLE TO RETURN)).
Patient problems: Osteomyelitis
MAUDE report 22057093 ↗InjuryApr 11, 2025Collapse; Material Integrity Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Collapse; Material Integrity Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED DISC FAILURE UNDERWENT ADDITIONAL LEVEL FUSION. C5-6 M6C IN SITU, REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH CAGE AND NEW PLATE TO COVER C5-7 (C6-7 ALREADY FUSED).
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Osteolysis
MAUDE report 21829827 ↗InjuryJan 21, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DR EXPLANTED AN M6 AND CONVERTED IT TO A FUSION. PATIENT WAS ADMITTED FOR INFECTION OF THE DEVICE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE CORE WAS FRAYED. OSTEOLYSIS WAS NOTED ON THE FORM.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection; Osteolysis
MAUDE report 21200339 ↗InjuryNov 1, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A REMOVAL OF MC6 FROM PATIENT TODAY BY DR DUE TO PERSISTENT NECK PAIN. DR WAS ABLE TO REMOVE IMPLANT WHOLE WITH ONLY LIMITED DAMAGE TO INNER SHEATH DUE TO DRILL. DISC LOOKS IN GOOD CONDITION AND NO SIGNS OF OSTEOLYSIS
Patient problems: Neck Pain
MAUDE report 20592490 ↗InjuryNov 1, 2024Mechanical Problem; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Mechanical Problem; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
IT WAS REPORTED: OP: C4/5 TDR (PRO-DISC) + REPLACEMENT (REVISION) OF C5/6+C6/7 M6C - REPLACING WITH PRISM BOREALIS AUILIA ACDF IMPLANTS. OSTEOLYSIS DIAGNOSIS AND MECHANICAL FAILURE OF THE PROSTHESIS ON BOTH LEVELS C5/6+ C6/7 . IMPLANTATION TIME FRAME 1ST - (ESTIMATE YEAR- 2015) C6/7 - IMPLANTED IN WA 2ND - (ESTIMATE YEAR- 2017) C5/6 - IMPLANTED BY J. PAPACOSTAS - QLD . FINDINGS DURING REMOVAL -FOUND A BIG GRANULOMA IN FRONT OF C5/6. SAMPLE TAKEN AND SENT TO PATHOLOGY ( C5/6 GRANULATION TISSUE). REMOVED C6/7 FIRST (IN PARTS) FOLLOWED BY C 5/6. (INTACT IMPLANT)
Patient problems: Granuloma; Osteolysis
MAUDE report 20592434 ↗InjuryNov 1, 2024Mechanical Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Mechanical Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED: OP: C4/5 TDR (PRO-DISC) + REPLACEMENT (REVISION) OF C5/6+C6/7 M6C - REPLACING WITH PRISM BOREALIS AUILIA ACDF IMPLANTS. OSTEOLYSIS DIAGNOSIS AND MECHANICAL FAILURE OF THE PROSTHESIS ON BOTH LEVELS C5/6+ C6/7. IMPLANTATION TIME FRAME. 1ST - (ESTIMATE YEAR- 2015) C6/7 - IMPLANTED IN (B)(6). 2ND - (ESTIMATE YEAR- 2017) C5/6 - IMPLANTED BY (B)(6). FINDINGS DURING REMOVAL -FOUND A BIG GRANULOMA IN FRONT OF C5/6. SAMPLE TAKEN AND SENT TO PATHOLOGY (C5/6 GRANULATION TISSUE). REMOVED C6/7 FIRST (IN PARTS) FOLLOWED BY C 5/6 (INTACT IMPLANT).
Patient problems: Granuloma; Osteolysis
MAUDE report 20592263 ↗InjuryJun 11, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT DEVELOPED SEVERE OSTEOLYSIS. FIRST ATTEMPT TO REVISE AND RELIVE PRESSURE ON THE CORD WAS DONE BY LAMINOPLASTY AT C3/4/6 LEVEL EARLIER THIS YEAR. DATE TBA. DOCTOR MADE THE DECISION TO REMOVE THE FAILED DISC AND FUSE C4/6 LEVEL. C5/6 LEVEL STILL INTACT SO IT WAS NOT REVISED. PATIENT DEVELOPED PAIN AND WEAKNESS AND A CT REVEALED A FAILED M6-C DEVICE AND OSTEOLYSIS AT C3/4. IT WAS REVISED AND FUSED WITH A CAGE AND PLATE.
Patient problems: Osteolysis; Pain
MAUDE report 19513637 ↗InjuryJun 11, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED DISC AT 5/6 HAD SIGN OF RUPTURE BUT IT'S DIFFICULT TO TELL WHAT THE STATE OF THE DISC WAS IN IN-SITU AS SURGEON CAUSES FURTHER DAMAGE TO THE DISC TO GET IT OUT. PATIENT ASYMPTOMATIC BUT OSTEOLYSIS PICKED UP ON ROUTINE FOLLOW UP IMAGING THE NSI GROUP ALL DO HERE NOW. C5/6 AND C6/7 FOREIGN BODY OSTEOLYSIS. DOCTOR PERFORMED C5/6-C6/7 SUBTOTAL VERTEBRECTOMY AND R/O M6-C (X2). REDO C5/6 AND C6/7 DECOMPRESSION ILIAC CREST GRAFT RECONSTRUCTION. C5/6-C6/7 FIXATION. PER OP REPORT: BOTH IMPLANTS MOBILE AND EXPLANTED. RPH HISTOLOGY MULTIPLE SAMPLES OF TISSUE FROM OSTEOLYSIS CYST.
Patient problems: Osteolysis
MAUDE report 19512468 ↗InjuryJun 11, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED DISC AT 5/6 HAD SIGN OF RUPTURE BUT IT'S DIFFICULT TO TELL WHAT THE STATE OF THE DISC WAS IN IN-SITU AS SURGEON CAUSES FURTHER DAMAGE TO THE DISC TO GET IT OUT. PATIENT ASYMPTOMATIC BUT OSTEOLYSIS PICKED UP ON ROUTINE FOLLOW UP IMAGING THE NSI GROUP ALL DO HERE NOW. C5/6 AND C6/7 FOREIGN BODY OSTEOLYSIS. DOCTOR PERFORMED C5/6-C6/7 SUBTOTAL VERTEBRECTOMY AND R/O M6-C (X2). REDO C5/6 AND C6/7 DECOMPRESSION ILIAC CREST GRAFT RECONSTRUCTION. C5/6-C6/7 FIXATION. PER OP REPORT: BOTH IMPLANTS MOBILE AND EXPLANTED. RPH HISTOLOGY MULTIPLE SAMPLES OF TISSUE FROM OSTEOLYSIS CYST.
Patient problems: Osteolysis
MAUDE report 19512152 ↗InjuryJun 5, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THERE WAS A REMOVAL OF AN M6-C DEVICE AT C6/7. SURGEON ORIGIONALLY THOUGHT OSTEOLYSIS PRESENT BUT UPON COMMENCEMENT OF THE PROCEDURE HE NOW THINKS INFECTION WAS THE CAUSE. THERE WAS A LARGE COLLECTION OF PUS. PATIENT HAS A 2 LEVEL M6 IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2024 AT C5/6-C6/7 BUT ONLY THE LOWER LEVEL WAS REMOVED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 19469429 ↗InjuryMay 2, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
INFORMATION RECEIVED STATES: THE PATIENT IS A 64-YEAR-OLD FEMALE WHO PRESENTS WITH A HISTORY OF OSTEOLYSIS SURROUNDING C6/7 DISC PROSTHESIS. SHE ALSO HAS A DISC LESION AT C5/6. THERE IS EVIDENCE OF FIBROSIS, CHRONIC INFLAMMATION COMPRISING PREDOMINANTLY LYMPHOCYTES AS WELL AS NUMEROUS MACROPHAGES. THE MACROPHAGES CONTAIN METAL PARTICLES IN THE CYTOPLASM WHICH ARE NON REFRACTILE (METALLOSIS). THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF SUPPURATION AND NO EVIDENCE OF A NEOPLASTIC POPULATION. INFECTIVE ORGANISMS ARE NOT NOTED. THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF SEVERE HEADACHES, LEFT ARM PAIN AND AN INABILITY TO EXTEND HER NECK FOR ABOUT 18 MONTHS. HER SLEEP WAS AFFECTED BY THE PAIN. CLINICALLY THE PATIENT HAD MYELOPATHIC SIGNS WITH SEVERE WEAKNESS IN HER LEFT HAND. XRAYS AND CT SHOWED THAT THE CORE OF THE M6 DEVICE AT C6.7 HAD DISSOLVED AND THERE WAS EXTENSIVE OSTEOLYSIS IN THE SURROUNDING VERTEBRAE AT C6. AND C7. THE MRI SHOWED A DISC HERNIATION AT THE C5.6 LEVEL WITH SPINAL CORD COMPRESSION AND SIGNAL CHANGES IN THE SPINAL CORD. THE PATIENT HAD SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2024 AND THE M6 DEVICE WAS REMOVED AT C6.7, DISCECTOMY C5.6 AND C 6 CORPECTOMY PERFORMED WITH FUSION C5-7.
Patient problems: Fibrosis; Headache; Inflammation; Loss of Range of Motion; Osteolysis; Pain
MAUDE report 19231579 ↗InjuryMay 2, 2024Collapse; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Collapse; Insufficient Device Problem Information
INFORMATION RECEIVED STATES: THE PATIENT IS A 64-YEAR-OLD FEMALE WHO PRESENTS WITH A HISTORY OF OSTEOLYSIS SURROUNDING C6/7 DISC PROSTHESIS. SHE ALSO HAS A DISC LESION AT C5/6. THERE IS EVIDENCE OF FIBROSIS, CHRONIC INFLAMMATION COMPRISING PREDOMINANTLY LYMPHOCYTES AS WELL AS NUMEROUS MACROPHAGES. THE MACROPHAGES CONTAIN METAL PARTICLES IN THE CYTOPLASM WHICH ARE NON REFRACTILE (METALLOSIS). THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF SUPPURATION AND NO EVIDENCE OF A NEOPLASTIC POPULATION. INFECTIVE ORGANISMS ARE NOT NOTED. THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF SEVERE HEADACHES, LEFT ARM PAIN AND AN INABILITY TO EXTEND HER NECK FOR ABOUT 18 MONTHS. HER SLEEP WAS AFFECTED BY THE PAIN. CLINICALLY THE PATIENT HAD MYELOPATHIC SIGNS WITH SEVERE WEAKNESS IN HER LEFT HAND. XRAYS AND CT SHOWED THAT THE CORE OF THE M6 DEVICE AT C6.7 HAD DISSOLVED AND THERE WAS EXTENSIVE OSTEOLYSIS IN THE SURROUNDING VERTEBRAE AT C6. AND C7. THE MRI SHOWED A DISC HERNIATION AT THE C5.6 LEVEL WITH SPINAL CORD COMPRESSION AND SIGNAL CHANGES IN THE SPINAL CORD. THE PATIENT HAD SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2024 AND THE M6 DEVICE WAS REMOVED AT C6.7, DISCECTOMY C5.6 AND C 6 CORPECTOMY PERFORMED WITH FUSION C5-7.
Patient problems: Fibrosis; Headache; Inflammation; Loss of Range of Motion; Osteolysis; Pain
MAUDE report 19231385 ↗InjuryApr 3, 2024Collapse; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Collapse; Insufficient Device Problem Information
DEVICE WAS EXPLANTED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 19032975 ↗InjuryMar 8, 2024Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
DEVCIE WAS RETURNED FOR INVESTIGATION.
Patient problems: Dysphagia/ Odynophagia
MAUDE report 18870860 ↗InjuryMar 8, 2024Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR INVESTIGATION.
Patient problems: Dysphagia/ Odynophagia
MAUDE report 18870739 ↗InjuryJan 9, 2024Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
INFORMATION PROVIDED STATES THAT PATIENT HAD M6-C TDR IMPLANTED AT C4/5 IN (B)(6) 2020. PATIENT EXPERIENCED PAIN, WITH SUSPECTED OSTEOLYISIS. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE M6-C AND REPLACED WITH ACDF AT C4/5.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 18480981 ↗InjuryDec 2, 2023Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
INFORMATION PROVIDED STATES THAT PATIENT HAD M6-C IMPLANTED AT UNKNOWN LEVEL ON (B)(6), 2023. THE PROPER PROCEDURE FOR THIS PATIENT WAS TO BE AN ACDF AND A TDR (M6) HAS PROVEN TO BE INEFFECTIVE. NO OTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 18253295 ↗InjuryNov 29, 2023Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
INFORMATION PROVIDED STATES THAT PATIENT HAD M6-C IMPLANTED AT C4/5 IN (B)(6) 2019. THE DEVICE WAS EXPLANTED IN (B)(6) 2023 DUE TO SUSPECTED OSTEOLYSIS. SWELLING AND DYSPHASIA WAS NOTICED AT THE TIME OF DEVICE REMOVAL.
Patient problems: Osteolysis
MAUDE report 18235184 ↗InjuryNov 20, 2023Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
INFORMATION PROVIDED STATES THAT AN M6-C WAS IMPLANTED IN 2017 AT C5/6. THE DEVICE WAS EXPLANTED IN (B)(6) 2023 DUE TO PATIENT EXPERIENCED NECK PAIN, NUMBNESS IN LEFT ARM, TINGLING INTO FINGERS AND HEADACHES. X-RAYS REVEALED LYSIS AND SUBSIDENCE. THE VETREBRAL BODY ABOVE THE IMPLANT WAS SOFT AND UNABLE TO TAKE ACDF SCREW. STATUS OF PATIENT IS STANDARD POST-OP AND SOFT COLLAR.
Patient problems: Neck Pain; Numbness; Paresthesia
MAUDE report 18179386 ↗InjurySep 19, 2023Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
INFORMATION PROVIDED STATES THAT PATIENT HAD M6-C IMPLANTED AT C6/7 IN (B)(6) 2021. PATIENT BEGAN EXPERIENCING DIFFICULTY SWALLOWING DUE TO PREVERTEBRAL ABCESS AND PHLEGMONOUS MASS EXTENDING FROM C2 TO T7. THE ABCESS MEASURED 6 X 2.4 CM AT THE C7 LEVEL AFFECTING THE PHARYNX. THE M6-C DEVICE WAS REMOVED. PATIENT IS BEING TREATED POST-OPERATIVELY WITH SOFT CERVICAL COLLAR, ANTIBIOTICS, MUSCLE RELAXANTS AND POST OP PHYSICAL THERAPY.
Patient problems: Abscess
MAUDE report 17778344 ↗InjuryAug 22, 2023Collapse; Collapse
INFORMATION PROVIDED STATES THAT PATIENT HAD M6-C IMPLANTED AT C5/6 IN (B)(6) 2019. PATIENT EXPERIENCED A FALL IN MID 2022. THE IMAGES SHOWED SUBSIDENCE OF THE DEVICE INTO THE C6 VERTEBRA AND NON-UNION OF THE FUSION AT THE C6/7 LEVEL. PATIENT EXPERIENCED PAIN IN HIS RIGHT PARASCAPULAR AREA AND SHOULDER.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 17595270 ↗InjuryAug 22, 2023Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
INFORMATION PROVIDED STATES THAT TWO (2) M6-C DEVICES WERE EXPLANTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED AT THIS TIME.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 17595268 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Intervertebral Disc devices
- Prodisc C SK PDSM5Centinel Spine, LLC · Prosthesis, Intervertebral Disc2 recalls4 reports
- Simplify® Cervical Artificial DiscNuvasive, Inc. · Prosthesis, Intervertebral Disc1 recall12 reports
- Prodisc C 09.820.055SCentinel Spine, LLC · Prosthesis, Intervertebral Disc1 recall9 reports
- Simplify® Cervical Artificial DiscNuvasive, Inc. · Prosthesis, Intervertebral Disc1 recall4 reports
- Prodisc C SK PDSXL5Centinel Spine, LLC · Prosthesis, Intervertebral Disc1 recall3 reports
- Simplify® Cervical Artificial DiscNuvasive, Inc. · Prosthesis, Intervertebral Disc1 recall3 reports
- Simplify® Cervical Artificial DiscNuvasive, Inc. · Prosthesis, Intervertebral Disc1 recall3 reports
- Simplify® Cervical Artificial DiscNuvasive, Inc. · Prosthesis, Intervertebral Disc1 recall3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page