Skip to content

Zvu® HRIM-201Recalls & reported problems

Diversatek Healthcare, Inc. · Zvu® HRiM Probe · Class 2

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00816734022689), received between Jan 6, 2025 and Jan 6, 2025 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Split, Cut or Torn” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1
  • No Apparent Adverse Event1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 6, 2025No Apparent Adverse Event; Material Split, Cut or Torn; No Apparent Adverse Event; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    DESCRIPTION FROM MW5162137 VOLUNTARY USER REPORT: PRIOR TO PATIENT: PROBE WAS TESTED UNDER THE CALIBRATION PROCESS AND APPEARED TO BE IN WORKING ORDER. ALL SENSORS WERE GREEN WHICH INDICATED ALL SENSORS WERE WORKING PROPERLY. PROBE INSERTED INTO NARE WITHOUT DIFFICULTY. DATA REFLECTED ON SCREEN SHOWED THAT PROBE NEEDED INSERTED MORE AND THAT THERE WAS POSSIBLE COILING. PULLED PROBE OUT APPROXIMATELY 6 CM (IN ORDER TO FIX POSSIBLE COILING) AND THEN ADVANCED PROBE. PATIENT TOLERATED WELL. STILL DID NOT SEE ACCURATE DATA ON THE MONITOR (NEEDED ADVANCED MORE TO SEE THE OUTFLOW PORTION OF THE SWALLOW). SAT PATIENT UP TO ATTEMPT BETTER PLACEMENT AGAIN. PULLED PROBE OUT APPROXIMATELY HALFWAY AND PATIENT POINTED TO MOUTH (PROBE WAS NOW COILED IN HER MOUTH AFTER SOME MILD COUGHING/GAGGING). IT WAS DECIDED TO COMPLETELY REMOVE THE PROBE IN ORDER TO TRY A SECOND ATTEMPT. ONCE PROBE WAS REMOVED IT WAS IMMEDIATELY NOTICED THAT IT WAS BROKEN. PATIENT TOLERATED WELL. NO VISIBLE BLEEDING FROM MOUTH/NARES. SMALL AMOUNT OF BLOOD WAS NOTED ON PROBE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21084847 ↗

Other System, Gastrointestinal Motility (Electrical) devices

All System, Gastrointestinal Motility (Electrical) devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.