EverCross™ AB35W08060135 (UDI 00821684062081)Recalls & reported problems
Ev3, Inc · PTA AB35W08060135 EVERCROSS 035 V05 · Class 2
All models of EverCross (114)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00821684062081), received between Mar 8, 2019 and Mar 8, 2019 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K103322); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
Patient problems
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 8, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN WAS ATTEMPTING TO USE AN EVERCROSS BALLOON TO TREAT A LESION IN THE MID ILIAC ARTERY ¿ COMMON WITH MODERATE TORTUOSITY AND SEVERE CALCIFICATION 60% STENOSIS IN A PATIENT. NO DAMAGE NOTED TO PACKAGING, I.E. SHELF CARTON, HOOP/TRAY, NO ISSUES NOTED WHEN REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE HOOP/TRAY, DEVICE WAS PREPPED PER THE IFU WITH NO ISSUES NOTED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DEVICE OR COMPONENT DETACHED, CRACKED, OR FRACTURED DURING DELIVERY THROUGH THE VESSEL AT THE BALLOON. A DETACHED PORTIONED OF THE BALLOON REMAINED IN THE PATIENT WHICH WAS STENTED IN PLACE. THE DEVICE DID NOT PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY-DEPLOYED STENT, RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE DEVICE, EXCESSIVE FORCE WAS NOT USED. NO FURTHER PATIENT INJURY REPORTED FOR THIS EVENT
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque
MAUDE report 8403089 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K103322. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-1489-2014 · Apr 9, 2014 · Terminatedev3 EverCross 0.035" OTW PTA Dilatation Catheter, 6mm x 120mm x 135cm, REF: AB35W06120135. and ev3 EverCross 0.035" OTW PTA Dilatation Catheter, 6mm x 40mm x, 80cm REF: AB35W
Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices
- Coyote™ ES H74939135152010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal879 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135204010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal585 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135202010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal437 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135304010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal384 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135404010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal293 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939134152010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal279 reports
- Coyote™ H74939185202210Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal200 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135254010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal127 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page