RapidCross™ A14BX020080170 (UDI 00821684067246)Recalls & reported problems
Covidien LP · PTA A14BX020080170 RAPIDCROSS V03 · Class 2
All models of RapidCross (26)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00821684067246), received between May 24, 2018 and Apr 20, 2020 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Deflation Problem” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Deflation Problem1
- Fracture1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 20, 2020Deflation Problem; Deflation Problem
PHYSICIAN INTENDED TO USE A RAPIDCROSS PTA BALLOON DURING PATIENT TREATMENT. NO DAMAGE WAS NOTED TO THE PACKAGING PRIOR TO USE. NO ISSUES WERE NOTED WHEN REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE PACKAGING. IFU WAS FOLLOWED AND THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED WITHOUT ISSUE. AN INFLATION DEVICE WAS USED FOR BALLOON INFLATION. IT IS REPORTED BALLOON DEFLATION DIFFICULTIES WERE NOTED AND THE DEVICE WOULD NOT DEFLATE AT THE LESION SITE. IT IS UNKNOWN HOW THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9976691 ↗MalfunctionMay 24, 2018Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN INTENDED TO USE A RAPIDCROSS DEVICE TO TREAT A NON-TORTUOUS LESION WITH LITTLE CALCIFICATION IN THE MID RIGHT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED AS PER IFU WITH NO ISSUES IDENTIFIED. NO EMBOLIC PROTECTION WAS USED. THE DEVICE DID NOT PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. IT WAS REPORTED RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED ADVANCING THE DEVICE TO THE LESION. THE DEVICE WAS REPORTED TO HAVE FRACTURED. THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED OVER THE WIRE, ALL COMPONENTS OF THE DEVICE WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT WITHOUT A NEED FOR INTERVENTION. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A NANOCROSS DEVICE, WITH NO COMPLICATIONS REPORTED. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7540037 ↗
Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices
- Coyote™ ES H74939135152010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal879 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135204010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal585 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135202010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal437 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135304010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal384 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135404010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal293 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939134152010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal279 reports
- Coyote™ H74939185202210Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal200 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135254010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal127 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page