EverFlex PRB35-06-100-120Recalls & reported problems
Ev3, Inc · STENT PRB35-06-100-120 PROTEGE EF V10 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of EverFlex (14)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00821684069226), received between Apr 28, 2017 and May 24, 2018 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (2 reports).
5 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K060057, P110023); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture2
- Difficult or Delayed Positioning1
- Premature Activation1
Patient problems
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- Patient Problem/Medical Problem1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 24, 2018Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Fracture; Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN INTENDED TO USE THE PROTÉGÉ EVERFLEX TO TREAT A SEVERELY CALCIFIED LESION WITH 99% STENOSIS IN THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY(SFA), AS PER IFU. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED WITH NO ISSUES IDENTIFIED. NO EMBOLIC PROTECTION WAS USED. THE DEVICE DID NOT PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. IT WAS REPORTED THE PHYSICIAN ENCOUNTERED DIFFICULTY CROSSING THE LESION, AFTER SEVERAL ATTEMPTS AND USING EXCESSIVE FORCE THE EVERFLEX CROSSED THE LESION. DURING DEPLOYMENT THE STENT BROKE, THE DISTAL 25MM OF THE STENT DEPLOYED AND REMAINS IN THE PATIENT. THE REMAINING PART OF THE STENT REMAINED INSIDE THE DELIVERY SYSTEM AND WAS REMOVED THROUGH THE SHEATH. AN ADDITIONAL 6X100 EVERFLEX STENT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque
MAUDE report 7539968 ↗InjuryDec 13, 2017Fracture; Fracture
A PROTEGE EVERFLEX SELF-EXPANDING STENT WAS IMPLANTED IN A CALCIFIED LESION IN THE RIGHT DISTAL SFA IN (B)(6) 2017. THE ARTERY HAD MODERATE TORTUOSITY. DURING A FOLLOW-UP APPOINTMENT, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE STENT HAD FRACTURED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT NO PART OF THE STENT HAD MIGRATED. ANOTHER STENT WAS PLACED INSIDE THE FRACTURED STENT FOLLOWING A PRE-DILATION WITH A 5X100 PRE-DILATION BALLOON. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Patient Problem/Medical Problem
MAUDE report 7114223 ↗MalfunctionApr 28, 2017Premature Activation; Premature Activation
PHYSICIAN WAS ATTEMPTING TO TREAT A MODERATELY CALCIFIED LESION IN THE LEFT ILIAC ARTERY USING PROTEGE STENTS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE STENTS FAILED TO CROSS THE LESION AND A DIFFERENT SHORTER STENT WAS USED IN TANDEM TO COMPLETE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO INJURY TO PATIENT. THE FIRST STENT USED HAD BECOME FRAYED ON THE EDGE SO A SECOND STENT WAS PULLED. THE SECOND STENT WOULD NOT PASS EITHER BUT THE STENT STRUTS DID NOT GET FRAYED LIKE THE FIRST STENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6529336 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K060057, P110023. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0623-2024 · Nov 20, 2023 · CompletedProtege GPS Self-Expanding Peripheral Stent System, product number SERB65-09-60-80, Sterile.
- Z-1644-2022 · Jul 14, 2022 · Open, ClassifiedEverFlex Self-Expanding Peripheral Stent with Entrust Delivery System
- Z-2048-2016 · May 23, 2016 · TerminatedEV3 EverFiex" Self-expanding Peripheral Stent System, Sterilized using Ethylene Oxide, Rx Only, PRB35-08-040-080. The Protege EverFiex" Self-expanding Peripheral Stent System is a
- Z-1598-2010 · Mar 31, 2010 · Terminatedev3 Protg EverFlex Self-Expanding Biliary Stent System, Sterile EO, (REF: PRB35-06-150-080, REF PRB35-06-120-120 and PRB35-06-150-120), 4.5 - 5.5mm, Expiration: 2011-10-01, Rx on
- Z-0478-2010 · Nov 6, 2009 · TerminatedProtg EverFlex" Self-Expanding Biliary Stent System (for United States distribution). 6 x 150mm, Model # PRB35-06-150-080. Sterile EO, ev3 Inc, 4600 Nathan lane North, Plymouth, M
Other Stents, drains and dilators for the biliary ducts devices
- Hurricane™ RX M00545900Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 death705 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171060470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC384 reports
- CRE™ PRO M00558710Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall284 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545920Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls211 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171070470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC265 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171050470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC212 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545940Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls109 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171100470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC203 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page