Skip to content

Leung G21523Recalls & reported problems

Cook Ireland Ltd · Leung, Nasal Biliary Drainage Set · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00827002215238), received between Sep 9, 2025 and Sep 9, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 9, 2025Break; Break

    NASAL BILIARY DRAINAGE TUBE WAS PLACED ONE DAY BEFORE THE PATIENT'S OT SESSION. AFTER OT, THE SURGEON REMOVES THE NASAL BILIARY TUBE AND FOUND OUT THE TUBE WAS DAMAGED. SURGEON WOULD LIKE TO SEND BACK THE DAMAGED TUBE TO US FOR INVESTIGATION ON WHETHER THE TUBE'S MATERIAL HAVE ANY DEFECTED. PIECES OF THE CATHETER BROKE INSIDE THE PATIENTS BODY AND REQUIRED REMOVAL. 1. WAS THE DEVICE FLUSHED BEFORE USE? YES. 2. WHAT WAS FLUSHED THROUGH THE DEVICE (WATER, SALINE, CONTRAST, ETC.)? NORMAL SALINE. 3. IF NOT WITH THE DEVICE IN QUESTION, HOW WAS THE PROCEDURE FINISHED? SEARCH FOR ANY SIMILAR PRODUCT TO SUBSTITUTE IN THE MARKET. 4. DETAILS OF THE WIRE GUIDE USED (DIAMETER, TYPE, MAKE)? BOSTON SCIENTIFIC HYDRA JAGWIRE 0.035IN X 450CM. 5. PLEASE ADVISE THE ANATOMICAL LOCATION OF THE INTENDED TARGET SITE. BILIARY SYSTEM. 6. WAS THE PATIENT¿S ANATOMY TORTUOUS? NO. 7. WHAT WAS THE PATIENT¿S PRE-EXISTING CONDITION(S)? 8. WAS THE DEVICE STRAIGHTENED WITH THE PIGTAIL STRAIGHTENER (IF APPLICABLE)? N/A. 9. WAS THE ISSUE OBSERVED DURING DEVICE PREP, DURING ADVANCEMENT OR ON REMOVAL OF THE DEVICE FROM THE PATIENT? 10. WERE ANY ADDITIONAL DEFECTS OR ISSUES, OTHER THAN THE COMPLAINT ISSUE, OBSERVED ON T

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23003513 ↗

Other CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices

All CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page