Oasis G21739Recalls & reported problems
Cook Ireland Ltd · Oasis, One Action Stent Introduction System · Class 2
All models of Oasis (15)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002217393), received between Jun 27, 2018 and Oct 29, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method3
- Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 29, 2025Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method
AS REPORTED VIA EMAIL: "PLASTIC LUER LOCK FITTING DISCONNECTED FROM GUIDING CATHETER DURING STENT DEPLOYMENT." 1. WILL THE FACILITY BE REPORTING THIS TO A GOVERNMENT AGENCY (FDA, COMPETENT AUTHORITY, ETC.) NO 2. WHAT TYPE OF PROCEDURE WAS BEING PERFORMED? ERCP 3. WHAT WAS THE TARGET LOCATION FOR THE STENT? CBD 4. PLEASE DESCRIBE THE STORAGE CONDITIONS OF THE DEVICE PRIOR TO USE ESPECIALLY THOSE PERTAINING TO TEMPERATURE AND LIGHT EXPOSURE. STORED IN CLIMATE CONTROLLED ROOM, IN A CABINET. 5. WHAT IS THE REORDER NUMBER, DIAMETER AND LENGTH OF THE WIRE GUIDE THAT WAS USED WITH THIS DEVICE IN THIS PROCEDURE?* .025 OLYMPUS VISIGLIDE 6. WAS THE WIRE GUIDE LUBRICATED PRIOR TO USE? YES 7. WAS THE WIRE GUIDE INSPECTED FOR DAMAGE PRIOR TO USE? YES 8. WAS THE DEVICE AT THE CENTRE OF THE COMPLAINT INSPECTED FOR DAMAGE PRIOR TO USE? YES 9. WERE PREVIOUS PROCEDURES I.E., SPHINCTEROTOMY ETC. CARRIED OUT PRIOR TO PLACING THE COMPLAINT DEVICE? 1. (IF YES, PLEASE INDICATE THE PROCEDURE PERFORMED.) YES 10. DID THE PATIENT INVOLVED EXHIBIT ALTERED ANATOMY OR TORTUOUS ANATOMY? NO 11. WERE ANY OTHER DEFECTS OBSERVED ON THE DEVICE PRIOR TO RETURN (OTHER THAN THE REPORTED COMPLAINT ISSUE? NO 1. (IF YES, P
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23413092 ↗MalfunctionAug 21, 2025Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method
THE STENT COULD NOT BE DEPLOYED USING THE OA-10, THE PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT FELT IT COULD NOT BE PULLED BACK. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 31-JULY-2025 1. WHAT WAS THE TARGET LOCATION FOR THE STENT? BILIARY DUCT, 2. PLEASE DESCRIBE THE STORAGE CONDITIONS OF THE DEVICE PRIOR TO USE ESPECIALLY THOSE PERTAINING TO TEMPERATURE AND LIGHT EXPOSURE. AS PER STANDARD PROTOCOL OF AN ISO CERTIFIED HOSPITAL. 3. WHAT IS THE REORDER NUMBER, DIAMETER AND LENGTH OF THE WIRE GUIDE THAT WAS USED WITH THIS DEVICE IN THIS PROCEDURE? VIZIGLIDE ¿ 0.025 INCH X 450 CM 4. WAS THE WIRE GUIDE LUBRICATED PRIOR TO USE? N/A, YES, 5. WAS THE WIRE GUIDE INSPECTED FOR DAMAGE PRIOR TO USE?* YES 6. WAS THE DEVICE AT THE CENTRE OF THE COMPLAINT INSPECTED FOR DAMAGE PRIOR TO USE? N/A, 7. WERE PREVIOUS PROCEDURES I.E. SPHINCTEROTOMY ETC. CARRIED OUT PRIOR TO PLACING THE COMPLAINT DEVICE? NO 8. IF YES PLEASE INDICATE THE TYPE OF PROCEDURE PERFORMED. 9. DID THE PATIENT INVOLVED EXHIBIT ALTERED ANATOMY OR TORTUOUS ANATOMY? NO 10. IF NOT WITH THE DEVICE IN QUESTION, HOW WAS THE PROCEDURE FINISHED?* WITH ANOTHER OA-10 11. WERE ANY OTHER DEFECTS OBSERVED ON THE DEVICE PRIOR TO RETURN (OTHER THAN THE REPORTED COMPLAINT ISS
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22860046 ↗InjuryNov 30, 2018Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem
THIS FILE IS DEALING WITH THE OA-10 MALFUNCTIONING, AN ADDITIONAL FILE HAS BEEN OPENED TO CAPTURE CLSO-10-7. HALF WAY DEPLOYING THE CLSO-10-7, THE OA-10 GOT STUCK, CANNOT PUSH FURTHER, SO WE HAD TO REMOVE THE OA-10 & GUIDEWIRE. BECAUSE HALF OF THE STENT IS IN THE COMMON BILE DUCT, THE OTHER HALF OUTSIDE PAPILA, WE HAD TO USE A BIOPSY FORCEP TO PUSH IT INTO THE DUCT. FEW HOURS LATER, DOCTOR HAD TO REMOVE THE STENT BECAUSE XRAY SHOWS THAT IT WAS IN THE WRONG TRACK.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8118905 ↗MalfunctionJun 27, 2018Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method
REPORTING DUE TO MODERATE RISK. WHEN PLACING A 10 CM PLASTIC STENT (TTSO-10-10), THE PUSHER KINKED IN THE DUODENUM SO THEY HAD TO REPLACE IT IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7641668 ↗
Other CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- Hurricane™ RX M00545900Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 death705 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171060470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC384 reports
- CRE™ PRO M00558710Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall284 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545920Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls211 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171070470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC265 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171050470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC212 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545940Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls109 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171100470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC203 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page