Skip to content

Geenen G21803Recalls & reported problems

Cook Ireland Ltd · Geenen, Pancreatic Stent Set · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002218031), received between Mar 31, 2026 and Jul 20, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 1 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
  • Migration1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 20, 2026Migration

    THE DOCTOR WAS UNABLE TO FIT THE PROSTHESIS INTO THE CANAL. IT DETACHED AND FELL INTO THE DIGESTIVE TRACT, UNFORTUNATELY NOT RECOVERABLE. THE PRACTITIONER DEPLOYED THE STENT IN BAD POSITION AND LOST THE STENT IN THE DUODENUM. THE DOCTOR DID NOT SUCCEED IN PROPERLY INSERTING THE STENT INTO THE CANAL. IT DETACHED AND FELL INTO THE DIGESTIVE TRACT; UNFORTUNATELY, IT CANNOT BE RETRIEVED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 25881373 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 31, 2026Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method

    DURING AN INITIAL EXAMINATION, THE PROSTHESIS COVER BECAME LODGED IN THE ENDOSCOPE (NOT DETECTED AT THE TIME OF THE EXAMINATION). DESPITE CAREFUL HANDLING IN THE ENDOSCOPE PROCESSING AREA, THE AGENTS DID NOT DETECT ITS PRESENCE IN THE ENDOSCOPE (SWABBING DONE NORMALLY, PASSING THROUGH THE MACHINE WITHOUT ERROR). DURING THE NEXT EXAMINATION, THE STENT PROTECTOR WAS RELEASED INTO THE PATIENT'S BODY; THE ENDOSCOPY NURSES NOTICED IT IMMEDIATELY AND IT WAS ABLE TO BE REMOVED. DESCRIBE THE OBJECT AND HOW IT WAS RETRIEVED = NOT REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT BUT FROM THE ENDOSCOPE. 1. PLEASE DESCRIBE THE STORAGE CONDITIONS OF THE DEVICE PRIOR TO USE ESPECIALLY THOSE PERTAINING TO TEMPERATURE AND LIGHT EXPOSURE. ANS. STORED AWAY FROM LIGHT, AT ROOM TEMPERATURE IN A ROOM DESIGNATED FOR MEDICAL DEVICES. 2. WHAT IS THE REORDER NUMBER, DIAMETER AND LENGTH OF THE WIRE GUIDE THAT WAS USED WITH THIS DEVICE IN THIS PROCEDURE? ANS. OLYMPUS WIRE 0.25 AND 450 CM. 3. WAS THE WIRE GUIDE LUBRICATED PRIOR TO USE? ANS. YES WITH PHY SERUM. 4. WAS THE WIRE GUIDE INSPECTED FOR DAMAGE PRIOR TO USE? ANS. YES INSPECTED, NO DAMAGE. 5. WAS THE DEVICE AT THE CENTRE OF THE COMPLAINT INSPECTED FOR DAMAGE PRIOR TO USE? ANS

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24743366 ↗

Other CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices

All CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page