Skip to content

Cotton-Leung G21979Recalls & reported problems

Cook Ireland Ltd · Cotton-Leung Biliary Stent · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Cotton-Leung (21)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002219793), received between May 16, 2017 and Aug 12, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
  • Migration or Expulsion of Device1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Code Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 12, 2025Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method

    WHEN THE DOCTOR INSERTED STENT INTO CBD, STENT WAS NOT INSERTED. PLEASE DESCRIBE THE STORAGE CONDITIONS OF THE DEVICE PRIOR TO USE ESPECIALLY THOSE PERTAINING TO TEMPERATURE AND LIGHT EXPOSURE. ERCP PRODUCT CABINET (SHADED AREA) *WHAT IS THE REORDER NUMBER, DIAMETER AND LENGTH OF THE WIRE GUIDE THAT WAS USED WITH THIS DEVICE IN THIS PROCEDURE? OLYMPUS VISIGLIDE2 0.025¿ 450CM. WAS THE WIRE GUIDE LUBRICATED PRIOR TO USE? YES. WAS THE WIRE GUIDE INSPECTED FOR DAMAGE PRIOR TO USE? YES. WAS THE DEVICE AT THE CENTER OF THE COMPLAINT INSPECTED FOR DAMAGE PRIOR TO USE? YES. WERE PREVIOUS PROCEDURES I.E., SPHINCTEROTOMY ETC. CARRIED OUT PRIOR TO PLACING THE COMPLAINT DEVICE? HE DID SPHINCTEROTOMY. DID THE PATIENT INVOLVED EXHIBIT ALTERED ANATOMY OR TORTUOUS ANATOMY? NO. WAS THE SECONDARY INTERVENTION PERFORMED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE AS THE DEVICE FAILURE OR WAS IT SCHEDULED FOR ANOTHER DAY? SAME PROCEDURE. WHAT IS THE ENDOSCOPE MANUFACTURER, THE MODEL NUMBER AND WORKING CHANNEL SIZE THAT WAS USED FOR THE PROCEDURE? OLYMPUS TJF-260V 4.2MM. DOES YOUR MEDICAL FACILITY HAVE A SERVICE/MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE ASSOCIATED WITH ITS ENDOSCOPES? NO. *WAS RESISTANCE ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE INTRO

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22781451 ↗
  • InjuryMay 16, 2017Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration or Expulsion of Device

    THEY USED TO PLACE STENT AFTER AT THE DISTAL OF THE COMMON BILE DUCT STRICTURE SITE. THEY WERE ABLE TO CONFIRM THE STENT MIGRATION IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLACEMENT OF THE STENT. SO THEY REMOVED MIGRATION STENT.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 6568451 ↗

Other CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices

All CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page