Ultraxx G30365Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · Ultraxx Nephrostomy Balloon Set · Class U
All models of Ultraxx (9)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002303652), received between Apr 17, 2018 and Apr 15, 2024 — classified as 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Rupture2
- Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping1
- Device Operates Differently Than Expected1
- Material Separation1
- Material Twisted/Bent1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
- No Code Available1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 15, 2024Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping; Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping
NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19112842 ↗MalfunctionMar 31, 2022Material Rupture; Material Twisted/Bent; Material Rupture; Material Twisted/Bent
AS REPORTED, AN ULTRAXX NEPHROSTOMY BALLOON AND SET RUPTURED AT AN UNKNOWN PRESSURE. THE DEVICE WAS USED FOR ACCESS DURING A PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY. THE BALLOON WAS "EXTREMELY DIFFICULT" TO INFLATE AND THE KNOB WAS HARD TO TURN. AFTER THE RUPTURE, THE SHEATH WAS PLACED OVER THE BALLOON AND BENT IN TWO PLACES (IT IS UNKNOWN WHICH DEVICE BENT). A NEW DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE SUCCESSFULLY. NO UNINTENDED SECTION OF THE DEVICE REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THE OCCURRENCE. THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13971384 ↗MalfunctionNov 15, 2019Material Separation; Material Separation
IT IS REPORTED DURING THE REMOVAL OF A LEFT STAGHORN CALCULUS IN AN ADULT MALE PATIENT USING A ULTRAXX NEPHROSTOMY BALLOON AND SET, WHEN ATTEMPTING TO DILATE A RETRACTOR, THE BALLOON BROKE INSIDE THE PATIENT AND THE FLUID DRAINED OUT. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING THE BALLOON INFLATION. THE BALLOON WAS WITHDRAWN AND A SECOND BALLOON WAS USED WITHOUT COMPLICATION TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE EFFECTS TO THE PATIENT AS A RESULT OF THIS OCCURRENCE. NO SECTION OF THE DEVICE REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT'S BODY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9329633 ↗MalfunctionJun 12, 2019Material Rupture; Material Rupture
NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8692144 ↗MalfunctionApr 17, 2018Device Operates Differently Than Expected; Device Operates Differently Than Expected
IT WAS REPORTED AN ULTRAXX NEPHROSTOMY BALLOON SET WAS DILATED IN A PCNL TO ESTABLISH A NEPHROSTOMY TRACT INTO THE KIDNEY FOR STONE MANIPULATION, HOWEVER, THE SHEATH WOULD NOT ADVANCE. A SECOND ATTEMPT WAS MADE AT AN ALTERNATIVE PUNCTURE SITE WHERE THE SHEATH WOULD NOT ADVANCE AGAIN. THE PHYSICIAN STATED THERE WAS SIGNIFICANT SPACE BETWEEN THE OUTER DIAMETER OF THE BALLOON AND THE INNER DIAMETER OF THE SHEATH DESPITE COMPLETE INFLATION OF THE BALLOON. THE CASE WAS ABORTED AND THE PATIENT¿S STONES REMAIN WITHIN THE KIDNEY. THE PHYSICIAN HAS REFERRED THE PATIENT TO ANOTHER FACILITY FOR A PROBABLE PCNL AS FURTHER TREATMENT. TO DATE, NO KNOWN ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT RESULTED FROM THIS INCIDENT.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 7438557 ↗
Other CATHETER, NEPHROSTOMY devices
- Cook G09501Cook Incorporated · CATHETER, NEPHROSTOMY280 reports
- Dawson Mueller G09705Cook Incorporated · CATHETER, NEPHROSTOMY2 deaths215 reports
- Cook G09497Cook Incorporated · CATHETER, NEPHROSTOMY129 reports
- Dawson Mueller G11020Cook Incorporated · CATHETER, NEPHROSTOMY100 reports
- Cook G09502Cook Incorporated · CATHETER, NEPHROSTOMY86 reports
- NephroMax Kit M0062101180Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, NEPHROSTOMY1 recall25 reports
- NephroMax Kit M0062101600Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, NEPHROSTOMY1 recall11 reports
- Dawson Mueller G13768Cook Incorporated · CATHETER, NEPHROSTOMY59 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page