Innomed, Inc. 6890Recalls & reported problems
Innomed, Inc. · Namba Hip Slide for 22-40 mm Heads · Class 1
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00840277103925), received between Mar 31, 2016 and Feb 15, 2024 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break2
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 15, 2024Break; Break
WHILE SURGEON WAS USING SKID, THE TIP BROKE AND ALL PARTICLES REMOVED. SKID REMOVED AND REPLACED. BROKEN SKID SENT CPD.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18716579 ↗MalfunctionMar 31, 2016Break; Break
THE FOLLOWING DESCRIPTION WAS RECEIVED BY THE CDRH ON 02/17/2016, (B)(4). IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING A RIGHT TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY, POST-OPERATIVE RADIOGRAPHY VIEWED BY THE SURGEON WAS NOTED TO BE ABNORMAL. THE PATIENT WAS RETURNED BACK TO SURGERY AND THE SURGEON EXPLORED THE SIGHT FINDING A FOREIGN OBJECT WITHIN THE HIP. THE FOREIGN OBJECT WAS A CORNER OF THE NAMBA HIP SLIDE THAT HAD BROKEN OFF. APPROXIMATE LENGTH- 3.5 CM. APPROXIMATE DEPTH- 1.0 CM. DID REQUIRE REPLACEMENT OF NEW HARDWARE. RESPONSE: THE REPORT WAS RECEIVED ON 2/22/2016. THE INITIAL REPORTER WAS CONTACTED AND A REQUEST WAS MADE TO HAVE THE DEVICE RETURNED FOR AN EVALUATION. THE INITIAL REPORTER RELAYED THAT THE DEVICE COULD NOT BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION PURPOSES. IT WAS THEN ASKED OF THE INITIAL REPORTER IF PICTURES OF THE BROKEN ITEM COULD BE FORWARDED IN LIEU OF THE PHYSICAL ITEM. THE INITIAL REPORTER RESPONDED THAT THE PICTURES WOULD BE FORWARDED. A FOLLOW UP EMAIL WAS SENT TO THE INITIAL REPORTER ON 2/29/2016. IT WAS AGAIN REQUESTED TO FORWARD PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE BROKEN ITEM, AND IT WAS ALSO EXPLAINED THAT IT WOULD BE DIFFICULT TO PERFORM A SUITABLE EVALUATION WITHOUT EVIDENCE. ON 3/8/2016, THE INITIAL REPORTER WAS
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 5539717 ↗
Other Retractor devices
- Endo Paddle Retract 173046Covidien LP · RETRACTOR56 reports
- Omni-Tract® 4040Integra Lifesciences Corporation · RETRACTOR1 recall3 reports
- Omni-Tract® 11275Integra Lifesciences Corporation · RETRACTOR1 recall2 reports
- RadiaLux™ 50-101-1Medtronic Navigation, Inc. · RETRACTOR1 recall2 reports
- CHARNLEY 9620-04-000Depuy International Ltd · RETRACTOR1 recall2 reports
- NA 2176-10-000Depuy (Ireland) · RETRACTOR51 reports
- Fathom MR2-102050Seaspine Orthopedics Corporation · RETRACTOR1 recall1 report
- Omni-Tract® 11303RIntegra Lifesciences Corporation · RETRACTOR1 recall0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page