Skip to content

M SERIES 40010211000103010Recalls & reported problems

Zoll Medical Corporation · Defibrillator ,MAIN,BSC-4/SP02/AC/PC/EL/RC/SM/CDM/ENG · Class 3

All models of M SERIES (21)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847946003197), received between Nov 5, 2018 and May 22, 2020 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem1
  • Failure of Device to Self-Test1
  • Unintended Electrical Shock1

Patient problems

  • No Patient Involvement3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 22, 2020Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem; Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE DISPLAYED A "DEFIB FAULT 72" MESSAGE. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 10082815 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 12, 2019Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE FAILED SELF TEST. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 8884782 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 5, 2018Unintended Electrical Shock; Unintended Electrical Shock

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE CLINICIAN RECEIVED AN UNINTENDED DELIVERY OF ENERGY. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE CLINICIAN DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 8037240 ↗

Other Automated external defibrillators (non-wearable) devices

All Automated external defibrillators (non-wearable) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page