Skip to content

M SERIES BIPHASIC 40021711100124010Recalls & reported problems

Zoll Medical Corporation · Defibrillator ,MAIN,MANUAL-1,12 LEAD CCT,SPO2,ETCO2,NIBP,BIPHASIC,PACE,RCD,SMR,CDMK,AC,DMST · Class 3

All models of M SERIES BIPHASIC (59)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847946007072), received between Jun 9, 2017 and Jan 22, 2018 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Discharge” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Discharge3
  • Failure to Charge2
  • Output Problem1
  • Pacing Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Patient Involvement3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 22, 2018Failure to Discharge; Failure to Discharge

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE FAILED TO DISCHARGE. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 7210264 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 9, 2017Failure to Charge; Failure to Discharge; Output Problem; Failure to Charge; Failure to Discharge; Output Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE FAILED TO CHARGE/DISCHARGE VIA EXTERNAL PADDLES AND HAD NO PACER OUTPUT. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 6632028 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 9, 2017Failure to Charge; Failure to Discharge; Pacing Problem; Failure to Charge; Failure to Discharge; Pacing Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE FAILED TO CHARGE/DISCHARGE AND DID NOT HAVE PACER OUTPUT. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 6629797 ↗

Other Automated external defibrillators (non-wearable) devices

All Automated external defibrillators (non-wearable) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page