Skip to content

E SERIES 50001730020164013Recalls & reported problems

Zoll Medical Corporation · Defibrillator ,MAIN, AED-1, 12 LEAD, SPO2/ETCO2/NIBP, BT/GPS, PACE, AC, LI-ION, NO RAILS, DMST · Class 3

All models of E SERIES (160)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
15
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 15 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847946009717), received between Mar 22, 2017 and Dec 2, 2019 — classified as 15 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Power Up” (9 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Power Up9
  • Device Displays Incorrect Message2
  • Energy Output Problem1
  • Failure of Device to Self-Test1
  • Improper Alarm1
  • Incorrect Interpretation of Signal1
  • No Display/Image1
  • Output Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Patient Involvement13
  • No Information2

Recent adverse event reports

The 15 most recent of 15 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 2, 2019Energy Output Problem; Output Problem; Energy Output Problem; Output Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE'S DEFIB OUTPUT WAS OUT OF SPECIFICATION AND INTERNALLY DUMPED THE ENERGY AFTER CHARGING UP. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 9397603 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 19, 2018Failure to Power Up; Failure to Power Up

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE WOULD NOT POWER UP. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 7986160 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 25, 2018No Display/Image; No Display/Image

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE POWERED ON WITHOUT DISPLAY. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 7543953 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 18, 2018Device Displays Incorrect Message; Device Displays Incorrect Message

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE DISPLAYED A "PACER FAULT 117" MESSAGE. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 7440503 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 5, 2018Failure to Power Up; Failure to Power Up

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING FUNCTIONAL TESTING, THE DEVICE WOULD NOT POWER UP. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 7170001 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 5, 2017Failure to Power Up; Failure to Power Up

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE WOULD NOT POWER UP. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 7084390 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 19, 2017Device Displays Incorrect Message; Failure of Device to Self-Test; Device Displays Incorrect Message; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE DISPLAYED A "DEFIB PAD SHORT" MESSAGE AND FAILED SELF TEST. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 6875275 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 31, 2017Failure to Power Up; Failure to Power Up

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE WAS INTERMITTENTLY UNABLE TO POWER ON. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 6836002 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 7, 2017Failure to Power Up; Failure to Power Up

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE WOULD NOT POWER UP. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 6770692 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 27, 2017Failure to Power Up; Failure to Power Up

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE WOULD NOT POWER UP. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 6747879 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 27, 2017Failure to Power Up; Failure to Power Up

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO TREAT A PATIENT (AGE & GENDER UNKNOWN), THE DEVICE WOULD NOT POWER UP. COMPLAINANT DID NOT INDICATE THAT THERE WAS ANY ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 6670805 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 27, 2017Failure to Power Up; Failure to Power Up

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT THE DEVICE WOULD NOT POWER UP. COMPLAINANT DID NOT INDICATE THAT THERE WAS ANY PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 6670537 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 9, 2017Improper Alarm; Improper Alarm

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE DISPLAYED A "DEFIB PAD SHORT" MESSAGE. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 6632016 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 6, 2017Failure to Power Up; Failure to Power Up

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE WAS UNABLE TO POWER ON. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 6464937 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 22, 2017Incorrect Interpretation of Signal; Incorrect Interpretation of Signal

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ANALYZING THE HEART RHYTHM OF A PATIENT (AGE AND GENDER UNKNOWN) THE DEVICE RETURNED A "NO SHOCK ADVISED" DETERMINATION FOR WHAT APPEARED TO BE A SHOCKABLE HEART RHYTHM. THE CLINICIAN SWITCHED THE DEVICE INTO MANUAL MODE AND DEFIBRILLATED THE PATIENT. COMPLAINANT DID NOT INDICATE THAT THERE WAS ANY ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 6425310 ↗

Other Automated external defibrillators (non-wearable) devices

All Automated external defibrillators (non-wearable) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page