Skip to content

ONESTEP CPR AA 8900-0225-01Recalls & reported problems

Zoll Medical Corporation · ELECTRODES, ONESTEP CPR AA, SINGLE · Class 3

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This Zoll OneStep CPR electrode pad appears in 89 adverse event reports, with 3 deaths and 6 injuries. Reports often describe failed defibrillator self-tests, pads not being detected, and sparking. Some patient problems listed include burns. There was 1 report in the past 12 months, down from 7 in the year before. No recalls name this device.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
89
Deaths reported
3
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 89 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847946016289), received between Mar 17, 2017 and Dec 1, 2025 — classified as 3 deaths, 6 injuries, 80 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure of Device to Self-Test” (27 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 2 reportsFeb 2024: 2 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 3 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 2 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520263
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure of Device to Self-Test27
  • Unable to Obtain Readings24
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem11
  • Failure to Deliver Shock/Stimulation7
  • Sparking6
  • Device Operational Issue3
  • Arcing of Electrodes2
  • Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions48
  • No Patient Involvement21
  • Burn(s)5
  • Insufficient Information5
  • No Information4
  • Necrosis2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • Death1

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 89 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 1, 2025Unable to Obtain Readings; Unable to Obtain Readings

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE ASSOCIATED DEVICE FAILED THE SELF-TEST USING THESE ONESTEP PADS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23680187 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 17, 2025Unable to Obtain Readings; Unable to Obtain Readings

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE ASSOCIATED DEFIBRILLATOR WAS UNABLE TO DETECT THESE ATTACHED ELECTRODES. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22231617 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 19, 2025Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO TREAT A PATIENT (AGE & GENDER UNKNOWN), WHEN APPLYING THESE ELECTRODE PADS TO THE PATIENT, ONE OF THE PAD'S ADHESIVE WAS STUCK TO THE COVER. COMPLAINANT DID NOT INDICATE THAT THERE WAS ANY ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 22046405 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 7, 2025Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE FAILED SELF TEST. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21976789 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 25, 2025Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE ELECTRODE PADS FAILED SELF TEST. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21909205 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 26, 2025Unable to Obtain Readings; Unable to Obtain Readings

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, ASSOCIATED DEFIBRILLATOR WAS UNABLE TO DETECT THE ATTACHED ELECTRODE PADS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21468547 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 23, 2025Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE ASSOCIATED DEFIBRILLATOR FAILED THE SELF TEST USING THESE ELECTRODE PADS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21219599 ↗
  • InjuryDec 5, 2024Sparking; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Sparking; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO DEFIBRILLATE A 50-YEAR-OLD MALE PATIENT, SPARKS WERE EMITTED FROM THE ELECTRODES, AFTER REMOVING THE ELECTRODE PADS, BURNS WERE FOUND ON THE PATIENT'S SKIN. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THE CLINICIAN OBTAINED ANOTHER DEVICE TO CONTINUE TREATING THE PATIENT. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THE PATIENT SUFFERED BURNS. NO INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE ON THE DEGREE OF BURNS.

    Patient problems: Burn(s); Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension

    MAUDE report 20854879 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 3, 2024Unable to Obtain Readings; Unable to Obtain Readings

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE ASSOCIATED DEFIBRILLATOR WAS UNABLE TO DETECT THE ATTACHED ELECTRODE PADS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20126308 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 18, 2024Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING FUNCTIONAL TESTING, THESE ELECTRODE PADS DID NOT WORK AS EXPECTED. THERE IS NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE MALFUNCTION AT THIS TIME. COMPLAINANT DID NOT INDICATE THAT THERE WAS ANY PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19559991 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 14, 2024

    CHECKED ZOLL DEFIBRILLATOR FOR ROUTINE CHECK AND DEFIBRILLATOR READING "CHECK PADS". CONNECTED ANOTHER SET OF DEFIBRILLATOR PADS AND WAS ABLE TO COMPLETE ZOLL CHECK. REMOVED PADS FROM INVENTORY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19536385 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 3, 2024Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE ASSOCIATED DEFIBRILLATOR FAILED THE SELF TEST USING THESE ELECTRODE PADS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19448394 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 17, 2024Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO MONITOR A 65-YEAR-OLD MALE PATIENT, THE ELECTRODE PADS WOULD NOT ADHERE TO THE PATIENT'S SKIN. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THE CLINICIAN OBTAINED ANOTHER SET OF PADS TO CONTINUE TREATING THE PATIENT. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19124794 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 12, 2024Failure to Deliver Shock/Stimulation; Failure to Deliver Shock/Stimulation

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE ASSOCIATED DEVICE FAILED TO DISCHARGE USING THESE ELECTRODE PADS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18685495 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 9, 2024Failure to Deliver Shock/Stimulation; Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure to Deliver Shock/Stimulation; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE ASSOCIATED DEVICE FAILED SELF-TEST USING THESE ELECTRODE PADS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18677116 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 24, 2024Sparking; Sparking

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO DEFIBRILLATE A PATIENT (AGE & GENDER UNKNOWN), A SPARK WAS SEEN FROM THE ELECTRODE PADS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18570874 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 4, 2024Unable to Obtain Readings; Unable to Obtain Readings

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE ASSOCIATED DEFIBRILLATOR WAS UNABLE TO DETECT THE ATTACHED ELECTRODE PADS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18443070 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 8, 2023Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE ASSOCIATED DEVICE FAILED SELF TEST USING THESE ELECTRODE PADS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18091144 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 5, 2023Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE ASSOCIATED DEFIBRILLATOR FAILED THE SELF TEST WITH THESE ELECTRODE PADS ATTACHED. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17877037 ↗
  • InjurySep 8, 2023Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO PACE A 77-YEAR-OLD FEMALE PATIENT, AFTER REMOVING THE ELECTRODE PADS, BURNS WERE FOUND ON THE PATIENT'S SKIN. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THE PATIENT SUBSEQUENTLY SUSTAINED A BURN. THE CUSTOMER WAS UNABLE TO PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE DEGREE OF THE BURN.

    Patient problems: Burn(s)

    MAUDE report 17714959 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 30, 2023Unable to Obtain Readings; Unable to Obtain Readings

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE ASSOCIATED DEFIBRILLATOR DISPLAYED A "POOR PAD CONTACT" MESSAGE USING THESE ATTACHED ELECTRODE PADS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17240566 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 24, 2023Failure to Deliver Shock/Stimulation; Failure to Deliver Shock/Stimulation

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE ASSOCIATED DEFIBRILLATOR FAILED TO DISCHARGE USING THESE ATTACHED ELECTRODE PADS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16994736 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 20, 2023Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO TREAT A PATIENT (AGE & GENDER UNKNOWN), THE ELECTRODES WOULD NOT ADHERE TO THE PATIENT'S SKIN. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION. PLEASE REFERENCE MEDWATCH REPORT 1218058-2023-00082 FOR A SIMILAR EVENT REPORTED FROM THE SAME CUSTOMER.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16778080 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 20, 2023Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO TREAT A PATIENT (AGE & GENDER UNKNOWN), THE ELECTRODES WOULD NOT ADHERE TO THE PATIENT'S SKIN. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION. PLEASE REFERENCE MEDWATCH REPORT 1218058-2023-00081 FOR A SIMILAR EVENT REPORTED FROM THE SAME CUSTOMER.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16778040 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 11, 2023Unable to Obtain Readings; Unable to Obtain Readings

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE ASSOCIATED DEFIBRILLATOR WAS UNABLE TO DETECT THESE ELECTRODE PADS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16713544 ↗

Other Automated external defibrillators (non-wearable) devices

All Automated external defibrillators (non-wearable) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page