Skip to content

R SERIES 30001000001130013Recalls & reported problems

Zoll Medical Corporation · Defibrillator ,MAIN, MAN-1, BLS, 3/5 LD, STD ECG, AC PWR, W/PACE, CF/USB, DOMESTIC · Class 3

All models of R SERIES (94)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
20
Deaths reported
1
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 20 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847946017194), received between Jul 30, 2018 and Mar 30, 2026 — classified as 1 death, 1 injury, 18 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Unable to Obtain Readings” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Unable to Obtain Readings5
  • Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem3
  • Failure of Device to Self-Test3
  • Failure to Power Up3
  • Incorrect Interpretation of Signal3
  • Grounding Malfunction2
  • Unexpected Shutdown2
  • Failure to Deliver Shock/Stimulation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions10
  • No Patient Involvement6
  • Insufficient Information2
  • Necrosis1
  • No Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 20 most recent of 20 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 30, 2026Unable to Obtain Readings

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE DISPLAYED AN "ERROR FFFF" MESSAGE. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24728007 ↗
  • InjuryMar 3, 2025Incorrect Interpretation of Signal; Incorrect Interpretation of Signal

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO MONITOR A PATIENT (AGE & GENDER UNKNOWN), THE PATIENT DEVELOPED A PULSE AND THE DEVICE ISSUED A "SHOCK ADVISED" PROMPT FOR A HEART RHYTHM THEY BELIEVED WAS NON-SHOCKABLE. THE CLINICIAN SUBSEQUENTLY ADMINISTERED THE SHOCK TO THE PATIENT. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21503494 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 26, 2024Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE FAILED SELF TEST. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20067115 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 14, 2024Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem; Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING FUNCTIONAL TESTING, THE DEVICE DISPLAYED A "DEFIB FAULT 76" MESSAGE. COMPLAINANT DID NOT INDICATE THAT THERE WAS ANY PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18703402 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 21, 2023Incorrect Interpretation of Signal; Incorrect Interpretation of Signal

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO TREAT A PATIENT (AGE & GENDER UNKNOWN), THE DEVICE ISSUED A "SHOCK ADVISED" PROMPT FOR A HEART RHYTHM THEY BELIEVE WAS NON-SHOCKABLE. COMPLAINANT DID NOT INDICATE THAT THERE WAS ANY ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 16411171 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 28, 2022Unexpected Shutdown; Unexpected Shutdown

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE INAPPROPRIATELY SHUT DOWN. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16062505 ↗
  • DeathDec 16, 2022No Display/Image; Failure to Power Up; No Display/Image; Failure to Power Up

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO DEFIBRILLATE AN 81-YEAR-OLD MALE PATIENT, THE DEVICE POWERED ON WITHOUT DISPLAY. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THE CLINICIAN OBTAINED ANOTHER DEVICE TO CONTINUE TREATING THE PATIENT. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THE PATIENT SUBSEQUENTLY EXPIRED.

    Patient problems: Necrosis

    MAUDE report 15997508 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 14, 2022Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE FAILED SELF TEST. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15791114 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 18, 2022Unable to Obtain Readings; Unable to Obtain Readings

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE DISPLAYED A "CHECK PADS" MESSAGE. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14429341 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 17, 2021Incorrect Interpretation of Signal; Incorrect Interpretation of Signal

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO MONITOR A (B)(6) FEMALE PATIENT, THE DEVICE ISSUED A "SHOCK ADVISED" PROMPT FOR A HEART RHYTHM CLINICIANS BELIEVE WAS NON-SHOCKABLE. COMPLAINANT DID NOT INDICATE THAT THERE WAS ANY ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 13027078 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 22, 2021Failure to Power Up; Failure to Power Up

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE WOULD NOT POWER UP. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12683625 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 21, 2021Failure to Power Up; Failure to Power Up

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE WOULD NOT POWER UP. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12509207 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 1, 2021Pacing Problem; Unable to Obtain Readings; Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem; Pacing Problem; Unable to Obtain Readings; Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE DISPLAYED "ERROR FFFF," "PACER DISABLED" AND "DEFIB FAULT 95" MESSAGES. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12102273 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 6, 2020Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem; Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE DISPLAYED A "DEFIB FAULT 76" MESSAGE. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 10802701 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 23, 2020Grounding Malfunction; Grounding Malfunction

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE FAILED THE EARTH GROUND RESISTANCE TEST. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 10573052 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 1, 2020Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE FAILED SELF TEST. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 10478073 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 9, 2020Grounding Malfunction; Grounding Malfunction

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE FAILED LEAKAGE CURRENT TEST. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 9568886 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 12, 2018Unable to Obtain Readings; Unable to Obtain Readings

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING FUNCTIONAL TESTING, THE DEVICE DISPLAYED A "POOR PAD CONTACT" MESSAGE. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 8155250 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 29, 2018Unexpected Shutdown; Unexpected Shutdown

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING INCOMING INSPECTION, THE DEVICE INAPPROPRIATELY SHUT DOWN. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 8015617 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 30, 2018Failure to Deliver Shock/Stimulation; Unable to Obtain Readings; Failure to Deliver Shock/Stimulation; Unable to Obtain Readings

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO TREAT A PATIENT (AGE AND GENDER UNKNOWN) THE DEVICE FAILED TO DISCHARGE AND WAS UNABLE TO OBTAIN ECG SIGNAL VIA PADS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THE CLINICIAN OBTAINED ANOTHER DEVICE TO CONTINUE TREATING THE PATIENT. COMPLAINANT DID NOT INDICATE THAT THERE WAS ANY ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 7732621 ↗

Other Automated external defibrillators (non-wearable) devices

All Automated external defibrillators (non-wearable) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page