Skip to content

R SERIES 30001006201330012Recalls & reported problems

Zoll Medical Corporation · Defibrillator ,MAIN, R SERIES, ALS, 3/5 LD, STD ECG, AC PWR, NELLCOR, PACE, NIBP, CF/STD, DMST · Class 3

All models of R SERIES (94)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847946017590), received between Aug 1, 2018 and Jul 16, 2020 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure of Device to Self-Test” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure of Device to Self-Test1
  • Failure to Power Up1
  • Unintended Electrical Shock1

Patient problems

  • No Patient Involvement2
  • No Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 16, 2020Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE FAILED SELF TEST. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 10285597 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 22, 2019Failure to Power Up; Failure to Power Up

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE WOULD NOT POWER UP. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 9364642 ↗
  • InjuryAug 1, 2018Unintended Electrical Shock; Unintended Electrical Shock

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO TREAT A PATIENT (AGE & GENDER UNKNOWN) DURING TRANSPORT, THE CLINICIAN RECEIVED AN UNINTENDED DELIVERY OF ENERGY. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT AND THE CLINICIAN EXPERIENCED NUMBNESS IN HER ARM FOR ABOUT AN HOUR DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 7740523 ↗

Other Automated external defibrillators (non-wearable) devices

All Automated external defibrillators (non-wearable) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page