Skip to content

PROPAQ MD 300-1011301-01Recalls & reported problems

Zoll Medical Corporation · Defibrillator ,MAIN ASSY, 12LD, SPO2, C02, NIBP, IBP, PROPAQ MD · Class 3

All models of PROPAQ MD (15)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This Zoll Propaq MD is a portable patient monitor with a built-in defibrillator. Many of its 190 reports describe self-test failures, the unit failing to power up or losing power, blank displays, and incorrect messages. Most reports say no patient was involved. There is 1 death report and no injuries. No recalls name this device.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
190
Deaths reported
1
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 190 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00847946017644), received between Mar 16, 2017 and Jan 15, 2026 — classified as 1 death, 189 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure of Device to Self-Test” (55 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure of Device to Self-Test55
  • Failure to Power Up22
  • Loss of Power20
  • No Display/Image16
  • Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem14
  • Device Displays Incorrect Message14
  • Pacing Problem14
  • Reset Problem13

Patient problems

  • No Patient Involvement136
  • No Information32
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient19
  • Death1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Premature Labor1

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 190 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 15, 2026Reset Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO TREAT A PATIENT (AGE & GENDER UNKNOWN), THE DEVICE WOULD RESTART DURING AN ATTEMPT TO DISCHARGE AND THE DEVICE PROMPTED A "FAULT LED" MESSAGE. COMPLAINANT DID NOT INDICATE THAT THERE WAS ANY ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24080385 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 7, 2023Grounding Malfunction; Grounding Malfunction

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE FAILED LEAKAGE CURRENT TEST. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16497407 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 19, 2020Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE FAILED SELF-TEST FOR DEFIB AND PACER FUNCTIONS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 10699330 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 8, 2020Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE FAILED SELF-TEST FOR DEFIB AND PACER FUNCTIONS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 10649057 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 5, 2020Unexpected Shutdown; Unexpected Shutdown

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO MONITOR A PATIENT (AGE & GENDER UNKNOWN), THE DEVICE INAPPROPRIATELY SHUT DOWN. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10627820 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 29, 2020No Display/Image; Unable to Obtain Readings; No Display/Image; Unable to Obtain Readings

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE'S DISPLAY BLANKED OUT AND DISPLAYED AN UNKNOWN "ECG" ERROR MESSAGE. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 10599155 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 15, 2020Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem; Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE WAS UNABLE TO DETECT THE ATTACHED MULTI FUNCTION CABLE. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 10535255 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 7, 2020Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING INCOMING TESTING, THE DEVICE FAILED SELF-TEST FOR DEFIB FUNCTION. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 10381943 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 3, 2020Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE FAILED SELF-TEST FOR DEFIB FUNCTION. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 10356248 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 20, 2020Unable to Obtain Readings; Unable to Obtain Readings

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING FUNCTIONAL TESTING, THE DEVICE WAS UNABLE TO DETECT THE ATTACHED ELECTRODE PADS. COMPLAINANT DID NOT INDICATE THAT THERE WAS ANY PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 10297618 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 20, 2020Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE FAILED SELF TEST. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 10295418 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 17, 2020No Display/Image; No Display/Image

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING FUNCTIONAL TESTING, THE DEVICE POWERED ON WITHOUT DISPLAY. COMPLAINANT DID NOT INDICATE THAT THERE WAS ANY PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 10289571 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 14, 2020Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE FAILED SELF-TEST FOR PACER FUNCTION. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 10270778 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 29, 2020No Display/Image; No Display/Image

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO TREAT A PATIENT (AGE & GENDER UNKNOWN), THE DEVICE POWERED ON WITHOUT DISPLAY. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10207349 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 26, 2020Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE FAILED SELF-TEST FOR DEFIB AND PACER FUNCTIONS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 10200650 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 4, 2020Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE FAILED SELF-TEST FOR DEFIB AND PACER FUNCTIONS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 10119627 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 29, 2020Energy Output Problem; Energy Output Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO PACE A (B)(6) YEAR-OLD MALE PATIENT, THE DEVICE'S PACER OUTPUT WAS OUT OF SPECIFICATION. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THE CLINICIAN OBTAINED ANOTHER DEVICE TO CONTINUE TREATING THE PATIENT. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10101959 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 18, 2020Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING BIOMED TESTING, THE DEVICE FAILED SELF-TEST FOR DEFIB AND PACER FUNCTIONS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 10066614 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 5, 2020Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE FAILED SELF-TEST FOR PACER FUNCTION. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 10025773 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 27, 2020Pacing Problem; Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem; Pacing Problem; Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE DISPLAYED A "PACE DEFIB DEVICE FAILURE" MESSAGE. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 10002595 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 16, 2020Failure to Power Up; Failure to Power Up

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING FUNCTIONAL TESTING, THE DEVICE WOULD NOT POWER UP. COMPLAINANT DID NOT INDICATE THAT THERE WAS ANY PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 9969202 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 1, 2020Unexpected Shutdown; Unexpected Shutdown

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO MONITOR A PATIENT (AGE & GENDER UNKNOWN), THE DEVICE INAPPROPRIATELY SHUT DOWN. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 9911726 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 19, 2020Pacing Problem; Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem; Pacing Problem; Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING FUNCTIONAL TESTING, THE DEVICE DISPLAYED A "DEFIB PACER DEVICE FAILURE" MESSAGE. COMPLAINANT DID NOT INDICATE THAT THERE WAS ANY PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 9856791 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 11, 2020Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE FAILED SELF-TEST FOR PACER FUNCTION. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 9819256 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 2, 2020Failure of Device to Self-Test; Unexpected Shutdown; Failure of Device to Self-Test; Unexpected Shutdown

    COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO MONITOR A MALE PATIENT (AGE UNKNOWN), THE DEVICE INAPPROPRIATELY SHUT DOWN. UPON RE-POWER UP OF THE DEVICE, THE DEVICE THEN FAILED SELF TEST. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THE CLINICIAN OBTAINED ANOTHER DEVICE TO CONTINUE TREATING THE PATIENT. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 9776284 ↗

Other Automated external defibrillators (non-wearable) devices

All Automated external defibrillators (non-wearable) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page